this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
666 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

17384 readers
1719 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 63 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's level, not flat. Measuring flat-ness is a whole different complexity and ball game.

[–] chefdano3@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

You mean a whole different disc game.

[–] LiarAmongAll@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Yep, we use laser trackers at work to define flatness. I'm sure that much isn't required, but it's down to .003in, so pretty flat and it's fast. But that's a literal laser instrument designed to do such things and costs 250k. I guess you could with a faro arm or romer arm, but again, those are still 10s of thousands of dollars. CMM? Those can get reeeaaallly pricy

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's flat all across the globe

[–] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago
[–] credo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And level! It must be at the center.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No, you are at the top. If you were at the center you wouldn't need a level to tell you.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago

Some ancient Greek nerd calculating the earth's circumference by measuring shadows: Am I a joke to you?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

The haversine formula is more accurate than a straight line in measuring distances around the size of cities or zip codes. Geodesics are even more accurate because they take into account the stretching around the equator, both require curved earths to calculate more accurate distances than flat calculations. But obviously math, especially addition, is a conspiracy to cover the truth of the Time Cube™. /s

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Great illustration of the issue underlying flat-earthism. 👍

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Can it find my level? I lost it 🥺

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If water finds it's level, why is the bubble finding the level? Open your eyes!

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You actually proved the exact opposite.

That dry, dusty ground proves that water can't always find the level.

Find the level. Yeah, I'll show myself out.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

OP found a manifold, and stampeded straight towards the wrong large-scale interpretation.
Like an Earth-measuring version of charly kirk on the gun issue, and look at him now, where that got him.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago

I'm going to stop saying it's level

Now: it's correctly tangential to the Earth