this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
512 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26257 readers
3718 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President backs Cuomo in election eve Truth Social post as Mamdani hits back at Trump’s ‘threat – it is not the law’

On the eve of New York’s well-watched mayoral election, Donald Trump issued a threat to its voters: stop Zohran Mamdani or pay.

“If Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the Election for Mayor of New York City, it is highly unlikely that I will be contributing Federal Funds, other than the very minimum as required, to my beloved first home,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “I don’t want to send, as President, good money after bad.”

Trump’s comments echo those broadcast on Sunday during his appearance on CBS’s 60 minutes, in which he said: “It’s gonna be hard for me as the president to give a lot of money to New York, because if you have a communist running New York, all you’re doing is wasting the money you’re sending there.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quexotic 9 points 12 hours ago

Go ahead TACO.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Hilarious watching these idiots call literally everything they don't like "communism".

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Communist, socialist, anarchist, antifa, woke, leftist. Which ones am I missing that ain’t slurs?

[–] jtj4135@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

It's their catch all term for any policy that helps average Americans. After all, licking billionaire's butts is just too irrestible for these class traitors.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago

Communism, pedophiles, terrorists. Take your pick.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 13 hours ago

Your move, orange boy.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure it's perfectly legal to interfere with a free and fair election.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago

what is anyone going to do about it? I think it's clear that dumpy is immune to laws.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is impeachable ... par fot the course with Trump and MAGA. So sick of injustice.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

how many times do you think any other president would have been successfully impeached for trump's roll of crime? 50? 100 times?

to me, the confidential docs debacle and j6 are the worst of the worst; the docs one stings especially because I know what it takes to obtain and maintain a security clearance and wonder how much he put at risk - both human assets and strategic plans - in his fucking bathroom - knowing that similar behavior in the military would get you a nice stretch at leavenworth federal correctional facility and you might see freedom in a few decades. maybe.

dems should enumerate the list and use it any time someone talks about presidential fitness. "Oh you're worried about a woman president, but this fuck did treason after treason and that's fine?"

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The billionaires don’t want you to know this but you pay taxes to the states your business is located in. You don’t just “leave” because taxes. The businesses these billionaires own in New York are still subject to taxes.

What’s crazy is the right has “donated” more money to supporting cuomo than Mamdani would have even taxed them.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Businesses already set up headquarters in Delaware for tax reasons. They're not going to leave New York City, one of biggest markets on Earth. This argument from conservatives was always stupid.

[–] whatalute@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

My Trump-addled father is now declaring that Wall St is going to relocate to Texas because of Mamdani's victory. 😐

Yeah but there is no quid pro quo with Mamdani. As far as I know...

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago

Communism vs the dictator l

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Trump has a lot of property in New York.

Sure would be a shame if he finally saw some consequences and lost a few dozen of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frankiehollywood@lemmy.zip 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

djt wouldn't be able to name the communist countries in the world to save his life. It is a very anti-American behavior to label half of Americans as enemies. The US totally includes an opposition party. Idiot still doesn't understand what a democracy is and how to stay in his lane.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

China and Cuba, that's the only places they ever mention if they do.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 5 points 19 hours ago

No way, he'd way over estimate

Sweden The UK Venezuela Colombia New Zealand France Etc

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Whenever these fucks try and paint Americans as terrorists and threaten to cut off anything they create monsters they can't control. Anyone he attacks becomes wildly popular and almost assures them victory. Especially if he has his thugs come rough them up.

Fuck you cancer. You take far too many good people while skipping this piece of shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Idk man, I see a lot of red caps at a certain party's rallies

red = obvious communist symbolism

I think those caps even say "make america great again" which obviously sounds like a communist slogan

I'd say we arrest these filthy communists 😏

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

sounds like a communist slogan

I've always been amused by the fact that "gung ho" (which in Mandarin means "pull together", as in pulling on a rope in unison) started out as a slogan of the Chinese Communist Party under Mao and then migrated to the US during WWII because of an openly-communist Marine. Its real meaning is more like "be a team player" but it was somehow transformed into "eagerly shoot brown people".

Also, the Marines' "ooh rah" chant sounds exactly like the Soviet Red Army's chant. More weird shit.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

“gung ho” (which in Mandarin means “pull together”, as in pulling on a rope in unison)

I'm a native Mandarin speaker and I'm so confused what ur talking about lolz.

You mean like 共和? "together in unison/harmony" aka: "republicanism"?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gung_ho

The wikipedia article doesn't mention the "pull together" (as in rope pulling) interpretation. That was from a book about Mao that I read a long time ago, I can't remember what it was. The book had a bit about Evans Carlson traveling with Mao's army and meeting him. I am certainly not a Chinese speaker so I'm happy to have my inaccuracies corrected.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

Sounds like a borrowed term from a random word converted into English. I wasn't aware there were any nationwide propaganda slogan related to it, looks like just some random slogan from a state-owned organization.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I may be wrong, but isn't NYC more of a money generator than it's a receiver? If that's so, I don't see how NYC would suffer, but it would widen the divide between such areas and poor dotational ones, making their people possible maga recruits.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most blue areas produce money, most red areas (excluding Texas I think) are leeches.

[–] Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

T*xas very much does too, despite how much they like to act big and bad and independent.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

Florida and Texas are the two notable red states that aren't mostly empty.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

So that would mean that New York could stop paying federal taxes, no? I'm sure it contributes more than it receives

I always find it hilarious how red states and their leaders are all about cutting off funds to the blue states that fund their miserable existence. "We will secede from the US!" Ok Boomer, good luck with funding yourself as all of you are so mismanaged that you would fail to feed your own population within the year.

lol NY doesn’t need “his” funds. Trump needs NY funds though.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 94 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Other states should protest by withholding taxes, as well. United, yes?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

That's not really how it works - there's no one big sack of cash that gets handed over by the state, individual businesses (and people) pay their taxes to the IRS directly, and then separately to the state tax agencies (obvs leaving out some of the draconian nuance here). States don't have a practical method of withholding taxes short of going to every business and demanding they stop paying the feds. While hypothetically possible at some point, it's not in the short term feasible.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There is a big sack of cash that gets handed over by the state: the federal payroll taxes for all the state government employees.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 98 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good thing it is legal for Trump and only Trump to meddle in elections. Yay.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

This is what’s happening. We all get riled up saying NY contributes more to the federal government than it receives so Trump needs NY more than it needs Trump. Which may be true, but the reality is that Trump is trying to dissuade voters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lilmookieesquire@lemmy.today 39 points 1 day ago

I really can’t think of higher praise.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 113 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I'd love to see NYC set up a voluntary escrow account for federal taxes.

You don't have to pay shit till taxes are due, have NYC sit on their withholdings and trump won't be able to build any ballrooms.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How the fuck...

When the ever loving fuck are people going to wake up and remember their government/civics lessons??

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›