this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
619 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

76730 readers
1338 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Regicide.

A feline queen reigns over my apartment complex. It's a fair regime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Rest in peace kitkat

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago (6 children)

There is probably an elevated risk of killing cats in any electric vehicle because there are fewer signs that the car is "on" and about to drive.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Let cats use them as litter boxes. Cats' revenge.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 10 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Highlighting individual cases like this is a good way to capture human emotions but the focus should be on the big picture. The moment a self driving car is statistically safer than a human driver it becomes the objectively better alternative. The fact that accidents will still keep happening nevertheless isn't a reason to revert back to human drivers.

This same "trick" is used in charity advertisements: starving kid will capture the attention of people but a starving village will not despite the fact that it contains that same kid.

[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 days ago

Good call out of the identifiable victim effect and the affect heuristic, where decisions are driven by emotional responses rather than objective analysis of risks or benefits.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Unpopular opinion: cats are an invasive species in most places, like dogs, and shouldn’t be subject to different regulations than dogs.

Keep them on a leash if you care about them.

Is this a bellwether for how the car will handle a kid? Perhaps. Worth thinking about.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

How many cars driven by humans run over cats each day? Do these outraged people think robotaxis are somehow worse than human drivers? If the humans in the car didn't see the cat, then it doesn't matter if it was a robot or a human driving at the time.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 5 days ago

A friendly reminder that cars are still highly destructive, whether powered by petrol, battery, or hydrogen, and whether driven by a human or automation. The only real environmentally, economically, and socially responsible solution is to drastically reduce the amount of trips made by car, by introducing road diets and modal filters, by having mixed-use medium or higher density zoning, by building high quality safe separated bike paths, and good quality, frequent, affordable public transport.

Also, keep your pets on your property. If there's no way to keep them from leaving your yard, keep them inside. It's better for them (they live longer on average, even if you control for the increased likelihood of getting run over) and for the environment.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Some days ago:

Waymo's co-CEO has made a bold assertion that society is prepared to accept a death caused by one of the company's autonomous vehicles.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Yeah, of a person, but this was a cat. We will not stand for this!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›