this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
224 points (95.9% liked)

politics

26425 readers
2569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Governor Gavin Newsom holds an early edge over Vice President JD Vance among young male voters for the 2028 presidency, according to new polling from a Republican-affiliated firm.

The latest League of American Workers/TIPP survey, conducted October 22-28, shows that among young men, 38 percent would vote for Newsom compared to 33 percent for Vance.

The findings suggest that Newsom—a prominent Democratic voice—continues to outperform expectations with a demographic that has trended toward the GOP in recent years. The results come amid renewed debate within both parties over how to win back young men, a group increasingly seen as pivotal to future national elections.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 115 points 2 weeks ago (37 children)

Don’t run Newsom. Run AOC

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It'll be Harris all over again. JD sucks but in no way would I be enthusiastic about voting for Newsom.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 43 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Anyone but Newsom. Please.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago

I'd prefer him over Harris I think, but wouldn't be very happy with either

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So far I think he’s better than Hillary Clinton. I also don’t really know what he stands for.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

He stands for corporations as far as I can tell. Occasionally he is on the right side of things, seemingly on accident.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone responding "at least he isn't as bad as that other corporate Democrat" is just sad.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I think there’s no way in hell Harris would win a democratic nomination. The stink left on her from losing to Trump will be very hard to overcome.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Democratic primary is going to be INTERESTING. God I hope we don’t fuck this up.

While I would love AOC, she would be the youngest by quite a bit. Plus, she probably needs to win something more than a house seat. It is great having a party leader that is so young.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

The problem with the party leadership route is that party insiders are the only ones who get to vote on it, and when that's the electorate she can't even beat Gerry Nadler. If she can run in a race with real people voting on it I think she could beat anyone.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Copy and pasting from my other comment

Her highest accomplishment is being a House of Representatives member. This is incredibly rare. Most people that become president have been elected in a statewide election, or had military, or were a part of the office in some way already (VP, secretary, etc).

To go from being a House of Representatives member to being president is a massive uphill battle.

I hope she runs and joins other democrats on the debate stage. It would raise her profile in a big way. She would have my vote for sure. But I would not get my hopes up simply cause of her experience level.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Vance is the lowest possible bar you could compare him to...

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

That’s good, Gavin needs a low bar or else he won’t clear it…

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Why do young men have such bad taste in politicians? Jfc

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Young people tend to have less experience and education. The younger you are, the less of both you have.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

IDK about that man, even when i was an inexperienced idiot (necessity for past tense arguable) I knew not to vote for obviously shitty people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck Newsome. More of the same bullshit Dems that lost to Trump…

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't wait for angry liberals to blame leftists for another historic loss after they choose to run Newsom against all reason.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All the more reason to start making sure people know they can vote in D primaries without any obligations in the general.

The only way Newsom gets the nomination, is if billionaires convince people not to vote in the Dem primary. And they've already started their propaganda.

So we absolutely need to make sure Dem primary turnout is as high as possible.

The neoliberal voters will show up in the primary, we can't just let them have it.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't think I have voted for the eventual winner in the Democratic primary since Obama in 2008. But the current primary process is broken, and only exists to rubber-stamp the establishment candidate. And remember that in 2008, Obama was not the establishment candidate, his win was not expected. If anything, the party has made the primary process even more of a game since then.

Having said that, though, if Newsom is the primary winner I will hold my nose and vote for him, because he will still be better than any Republican. (And if Trump is still alive by then, we will know that whoever gets the nomination will be in his pocket, anyway).

I would fix the Democratic Party primary process by doing it all in one month. Four weeks in May or June, 12 to 13 states per week, rotating by region. Fuck all these states who think they are special by having "first in the nation" primaries or caucuses, where the one Podunk town with 13 registered voters gets to be in the news every 4 years. Every state is important.

Oh, and do it on Saturday. Let the media cover it like it's fucking March Madness.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If Newsom wins the nomination, he'll probably win the general...

But that means he'd get to appoint a neoliberal as DNC chair, and they're sure as shit not going to let a progressive get the nom in 2032, Newsom would run again. Then he'd be out or name a new DNC chair again...

And 2036 we won't get a fair primary either.

We can't afford to go back

I don't care if you're a lifetime green party voter, anyone that considers themselves left of the Dem party still needs to vote in Dem primaries to drag the party left.

There aren't even Green primaries. You lose nothing voting in the Dem primary, and are not obligated to anything in the general.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Americans are so brainwashed that they think Newsom is some kind of hard core left winger as opposed to the truth that he’s only slightly less social conservative than Hillary Clinton.

He’s also very much a fiscal conservative. I don’t think the Prop 13 limited budgets in California really allow anyone to do anything major without years of congressional battles.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He’s basically Hillary, but California, yes.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, he is only as socially liberal as his ambitions allow. He was in favor of same sex marriage ahead of the DNC when he was mayor of San Francisco. Now he’s in favor of platforming bigots to increase his popularity.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It needs to be someone not buried in donor class money. Period.

This is a class war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

we need a leftist to run ffs

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, Gavin is a way better conservative than the couch fucker, but that ain't saying much.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gavin will run on a blue ticket on a 2016 maga platform, mark my words.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Oh look it’s the same pattern that’s been happening my entire life.

Gross.

Can we stop supporting establishment candidates? The fall in line crowd isn't falling in line and we would all benefit from having a progressive in office.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is it even a comparison? Who the hell would vote for couch fucker?

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 week ago

Newsom is very conservative and fucks over the poor rather than couches

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I used to think Newsome was possibly a psychopath, and I still do, and I thought it might hurt him in a national contest, compared to a “home town boy” like JD, on account of relatability, but now I think it might be the opposite, or at least also true that JD is too relatable for his own good…We know a little too well who he is…

He’s the bosses dickhead kid. You know, the one that would get drunk and tear around in his dad’s boat like an asshole with his other rich dick friends, got in trouble for that awful wreck in high school but nobody ever heard what came of it? Damn shame about that guy and his daughter. Yeah, he’s one that turned a wrench in the shop for a couple weeks but it wasn’t for him, the oil and solvents and whatnot, too hard on his hands. He went off to college for a few years, came back and took over the manager job his dad’s been promising you for a few years. Now he’s your boss, and he just cut your hours. Happy Thanksgiving.

That’s fuckin’ JD Vance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 6 points 1 week ago

Stop trying to make Newsom happen.

/this isn't directed at you OP, you're just the messenger

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

From the comments, it looks like a lot of people are willing to repeat the mistakes that got us Trump.

We’re so fucked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Vance is just leading them to the local furniture store.

load more comments
view more: next ›