this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
269 points (96.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

27386 readers
1675 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flipflop97@discuss.tchncs.de 66 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] southernwolf@pawb.social 23 points 1 week ago

Lol, this both shows how bad most models are... But also how damn good the two big OSS models are, DeepSeek and Kimi.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What an acid trip of a site. It updated while I was scrolling and legit thought I was having a flashback.

[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I ran into the same thing - they seem to change (potentially to other outputs from the same model?) when you click on the Question mark and go back.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Question mark says they are updated every minute, even gives you a prompt.

Watching for several minutes, none of then was good except Kimi K2. Sure, not every time, but solid third of them was actually working, while the others scored a perfect 0.

Also, as a Kimi K2 user (because Kagi), I approve. I don't use Kimi K2 for coding, though, because JetBrains doesn't offer that, but I use it in Kagi Assistant.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

deepseek v3.1 had an (almost) perfect clock once for me.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did it show the correct time? Did it tick correctly? From my observations, even clocks that looked okay had like wrong second speed, swapped hour and minute, or was rotated altogether.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah it was showing the correct time and right tick speed. But it was only one of the clocks on that model. The rest were wrong.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah it was showing the correct time and right tick speed. But it was only one of the clocks on that model. The rest were wrong.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

You know, it looks like clocks drawn by dementia patients

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Oh my god. I love that so much.

Now I need to do that but randomize which one is displayed ….

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That really is more logical. (Except that the initial element generally goes in the top slot of the clock. Note that 12 is the first hour both of AM and of PM.)

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A strictly logical clock for a 24-hour day would have 0 at the top with 1 on the right and 23 on the left. And it would be only ever set to UTC.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

UTC has leap seconds. We can do better. PTP/TAI for lyfe.

A perfectly logical clock would use a radio broadcast to count off seconds since a predefined epoch. Put a few of them way up high, so more people can see it, and make them so astonishingly precise that you could tell where you are just by listening.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

They should put atomic clocks in the GPS satellites for exactly this purpose.

[–] Deebster 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Look away, I don't want you to see me cry

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, if we're saving DB space, why not just use the generate_series function (assuming you're running PostgreSQL...)?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey man, shoulda coulda woulda, was it in the spec?

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's a little scope creep between friends?

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why limit it to friends? In my company, we do scope creep for everyone!

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

There's something to be said for consistency!

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait until you learn how months are numbered in some programming languages.

The clever documentation calls it "months since January".

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

JavaScript: Hold my Date!

new Date().getYear() == 125

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

JavaScript is in that set of "some" languages. Most of it ties back to C's struct tm which zero-indexes months (0-11), weekdays (0-6), and the rarely used day of year (0-365), as well as offsetting years by 1900.

The odd man out, so to speak, is the date (or "mday" as it's called there), which is in the range 1-31. One (Perl) book I own suggests that the zero-based ones are used to index arrays of strings and implies this one is different because it generally isn't used that way.

But anyway, these are decisions made 50 years ago that still haunt us.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This clock starts at both one and at zero!

img

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Content not viewable in your region

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Imgur have blocked the uk because they don't want to have to deal with ID shit our government pushed through without properly thinking it through

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, I must have forgotten to turn my VPN back on

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

That's odd. Here is the URL - https://i.imgur.com/YAGpXPd.png - it's just straight-up an imgur image. This is literally the first time I am hearing that this can happen to imgur images.:-(

The image is the speechless stick figure meme. Here, I found another source:

img

That seems not very welcoming to exclude people from viewing such images!

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And then you added 1, right?

...right?

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Not very future proof, what if the "numbers" eventually no longer become numbers?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

Undecimal supremacy!

[–] coreray00@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago

Everything’s an entity if you really think about it 😔