this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
820 points (97.3% liked)

Today I Learned

25766 readers
572 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I run a condo building and there’s about half a dozen apartments in the building that have been sitting vacant for as long as I’ve been here for about 5 years now. The owners don’t even live in the country. Just apartments sitting there unused for years

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

they are an investment.

here in boston, chinese people buy up apartments for their children to go to college, years ahead of time. several vacant buildings near my own place. even if their kid doesn't go to school here, it's still an asset that appreciates. chinese landlord that lives half a globe away doesn't care about renting it out either. it's just a place to park their money.

load more comments (16 replies)

it's it a solution or more that they're are abandoned areas with empty houses in places with no jobs or investments which aren't for for a community?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I don't know why homeless people don't break into every unused house and squat in it, especially in the winter.

Eventually, that's what's going to happen, as our society switches from a Trickle Down Economy to a Robin Hood Economy (take from the Rich, give to the poor). If the MAGAs and Dems don't want that, then they better get busy establishing a Trickle UP Economy.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yeah they do that in my city and neighborhood, unfortunately they often set the homes or apartment buildings on fire, using coffee cans full of gasoline as heat/light, or straight up cooking meth.

I wish homelessness were a problem so simple as "give them a home" but it's not. The original cause of their homelessness must be addressed for it to work. Strong safety nets must be in place, a strong welfare state, mental healthcare, training, substance abuse treatment.

Of course we could pay for that as a country but we're instead focused on multiplying the unimaginable fortunes of the ultra rich instead.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Housing first is just the most effective strategy. It doesn't solve everything, but it helps the most people fastest and is very cost effective

We have to fix a lot of things, but people focus on this because it's low hanging fruit

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Most of these houses are not in downtowns of big cities but in rural towns that are far away from everything. Not to mention, just because a unit is vacant that doesn't mean it's not being used.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago (23 children)

Its make believe, now everyone loose your minds!

Why: Baltimore has 10,000 vacant homes. You'll die or get seriously injured sleeping im about 90% of those. We sometimes call them bandominiums here.

See for yourself: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/baltimore-has-more-than-16000-vacant-houses-why-cant-the-homeless-move-in/2015/05/12/3fd6b068-f7ed-11e4-9030-b4732caefe81_story.html

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] notaviking@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The housing market crash, I believe was a lost opportunity. When the US government had to bail out banks, why did it not ask for those houses that went belly up. Could have started a social housing aid, here it could sell luxury homes to buy low cost housing to give to its most vulnerable citizens. It paid for those houses using people's tax dollars, why not use it for the benefit of the people

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

I have an idea. Why don't the empty houses just eat the smaller number of homeless people?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›