this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
297 points (96.0% liked)

Science Memes

17369 readers
1300 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Has anyone ever seen Liz Holmes and Mark Zuckerburg in the same room together? πŸ€”

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

gotdang shapeshifters man

[–] Dingleberrydipndots@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

Elizabeth Holmes, the former CEO of Theranos. She was sentenced to prison for defrauding investors. She started making claims that she could do exactly what the headline says. She claimed that current blood panels (which usually require a vial of blood for each test) were insufficient and outdated, and that her company could predict or diagnose a ton of diseases and disorders with only a pinprick of blood. She said that her company was already in the final stages of the research, and used those claims to entice investors. She said that her company was going to be on the forefront of a medical revolution, and investors were clambering to get in before they hit the market.

It turns out she was full of shit, was lying through her teeth, the technology didn’t exist, and they couldn’t diagnose anything with the tiny amount of blood she claimed. Medical professionals had been screaming about the fraud for a long time, but techbros and billionaires were happy to continue jumping on the bandwagon because she kept promising results in the near future. When the fraud finally came to light, Theranos’ valuation went from ~$9B to $0 basically overnight. It was a massive β€œshe stole from billionaires, so we’re making an example of her and actually prosecuting the white collar crime that never gets prosecuted” court case that started way back in the mid 2010’s. It only recently wrapped up a few years ago (I think in late 2022 or early 2023?) and she’s still serving time.

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

CEO of Theranos, currently spending time in jail for fraudulently saying they could do this.

[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 hours ago

They said they could do it. They charged people money to do this, when in fact they could not do this.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

She took millions of investment to make a company that sells "do it at home" blood tests. She never could actually do the tests work, but was trying to sell them anyway, and taking more money by telling investors they worked.

[–] OhShitSon@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 hours ago

and talking more money by telling investors they worked.

So that's why she's in jail, because she fucked the investors, not for selling a fraudulent product.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 3 hours ago

The one and only female Steve Jobs of course. Elizabeth Holmes.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 22 points 6 hours ago

Faking it until they_found_out_and_put_your_sorry_ass_in_jail VS Making it.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago

What they aren't saying is that you need a mass spectrometer to be able to analyse the pinprick of blood.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 93 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Every scientific article with β€œcould” in it is bullshit.

I could have a twelve in cock in my pants.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

No need to brag that your girlfriend could be wearing your pants

[–] Sidhean@piefed.social 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Woah, you got a 12?! I only scored a 4 on my cock exam :(

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

It might only be a 4 today but it COULD be a 16 tomorrow. Hallelujah!

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 30 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Don't shove numbers up your cock.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

I have the square root of negative one in my butt as we speak

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 2 points 43 minutes ago

I don't believe you, that sounds irrational!

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Caleful with that, I hear tell those cause sinusoidals.

[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 7 hours ago

Not sure about that tbh. Seems only tangential related

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of. More likely if you read the publication it is about something else, but that doesn't drive clicks. Maybe you have a 12 inch cock in your ass?

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

I could but I won’t provide proof just like these lying science fiction articles.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 16 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

What is so uncanny about her hair? It's like a wig, but dry and damaged.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 hours ago

Its bleached and straightened. The bellend shape implies it would be curly if she didn't cook it every morning with a flat iron.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Probably bleached too much? She always strikes me as uncanny because she comes across as the female Zuckerberg to me.

[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The uncanny, isnt limited to her wig. She looks like a Simpsons character made a wish on a Zoltar machine to be real person.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

uniqueinsults.com

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 89 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

There were plenty of articles claiming similar for her dogshit. Where's the peer reviewed studies?

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 59 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

You think news headlines are concerned with inconvenient shit like evidence?

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago

Of course not. Just pointing out that it's probably bullshit just like previous similar claims. The exact thing its making fun of.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, they really should be. Imagine how much better everything were if news outlets could be hold responsible for spreading lies.

[–] stray@pawb.social 11 points 8 hours ago

I recently watched an educational video for young students where they said something like "Journalists are usually sources you can trust because if a journalist lies they will lose credibility and their job," and I don't think we're living in the same reality. Just because a particular news source doesn't publish blatant falsehoods doesn't mean they don't lie by omission or use manipulative wording, and that's not even getting into the ones that make money expressly off lying. I think maybe they don't want to teach people to question state propaganda.

[–] stray@pawb.social 12 points 9 hours ago

The article doesn't seem to be selling any particular technology, but rather sharing information on the fact that the research is currently in progress.

https://archive.ph/Yv7GN

The concept of identifying risk factors via blood sample has always been a good one. I'm not a scientist or medical professional, so I just assume the reason we're not sequencing everyone's genome is that it's not currently a good use of medical resources. I can't recall the name of this woman or her product, but my recollection is that she was claiming something currently impossible, not theoretically impossible.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Her thing was supposed to work basically instantly, in a small box without a lab. This doesnt say anything about how that blood sample is actually tested.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Came in here for this.

Being able to do this at all is challenging, but building something the size of a bread machine that can be operated by anyone and maintains sterility on its own is something else.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] stray@pawb.social 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I think the study they reference is the UK Biobank itself, which is ongoing.

More info: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4380465/

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 33 points 10 hours ago

"Could" is doing about as much lifting in this article as Atlas lifting the world.

I'm holding my reservations until something actually comes along

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Can it detect puberty 10 years early too?

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 35 points 11 hours ago

I "could" get out of bed and get to work early.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Another scam?

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

What's Fem!Jobs doing these days?

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

She’s going to be pardoned by the foreign asset dictator and replace RFK jr after his brain worm is finished eating. I think her lawyers put in the pardon request a few weeks ago.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 6 points 9 hours ago

Given that her crime is essentially scamming rich people, I don’t think so. Rich people get special treatment after all.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 10 points 11 hours ago

Prison time last i heard, but not sure tbh

[–] ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Hard labour in a bright orange jumpsuit I believe.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 hours ago

Minimum security camp chilling with her hubby