this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
49 points (88.9% liked)

PC Gaming

12758 readers
1174 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Has a lot to do with the size of the developer and popularity of the game.

Ironic how OP's avatar is taken from Deus Ex. One of the few games that lets you kill children. Most people don't try, but I'm pretty sure everyone still finds a creative way to kill Louis Pan (he's a boy in the Hong Kong map who goes around extorting businesses, and releasing rats when they won't pay. He works for one of the triads, and though you do quests for them, they do not care if you kill him, though I think they remark on it).

Worse, in Deus Ex all the children are male (due to resource limitation). In the sequel, all the children are female and you can still kill them. There's a whole school of them and you can basically do a school shooting. The game isn't meant for that, but you can totally do it. Sold on Steam. Both of them are. Frequently on sale.

One of my favourite game series. I'm not knocking it. But it does show that Valve is willing to relax the rules for some.

Oh yeah. In Fallout 3, you can straight up sell a 5 or 6 year old girl into sex slavery. And there's a reward for doing so (an item you can only obtain in this way). You have to follow a few unlikely steps to get it, but it's also not hard. There's a slaver faction, and they won't shoot you on sight. You want to get in there for a Bobblehead (permanent skill increase, in this case Barter, which helps your buy/sell prices and speech checks), so you enslave one person, or kill them. Another quest has one slaver target sniping you, and experienced players circle round and kill him first, so that gets you into Paradise Falls (the slaver settlement). If you complete all the slaver contracts (enslave three other people by making them put a bomb collar on their neck and give them marching orders), the slaver leader tells you he has a client with certain tastes, and he wants you to go find the youngest girl you can. There's a settlement (cave) full of children, and you must pass through to complete the game. There's one girl, Bumble, who is explicitly declared as the youngest, little more than a baby, barely able to fend for herself. And you can speech-check her to follow you outside to hand her over to the slavers. Slaver, it's actually just one. And, fun fact, a lot of veteran players do this, because there's a bug where you can "reverse pickpocket" weapons and armour onto NPCs to equip them better. Including kids. So what we do is, we take Bumble out, then we reverse pickpocket good armour and a flame thrower on her. These increase her internal/hidden confidence stat, so when the slaver threatens her, instead of running and getting caught, she attacks. And she wins. And then proudly walks back in her armour. It's funny.

A lot of older games had stuff like that in it, either references or outright stated. I've never heard of Valve going after them.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 6 hours ago

In Pathologic 1, there is a quest line where the player is given the option to kill a child. The player is encouraged to kill the child as looting gives the player much needed resources.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In Fallout 3, you can straight up sell a 5 or 6 year old girl into sex slavery.

There's nothing in the game that implies it's sex slavery. That's coming from you.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Tell me you skip through the dialogue without reading it without telling me you skip through the dialogue.

Eulogy is the name of the slaver leader, IIRC. It's been ages since I've played it. So the guard out front gives you the four targets, tells you to get one and you can come in. I think the first four targets, even after the first one and you've gained access, are through this guard. I think Eulogy or whatever his name is just talks to you in his penthouse, which is where the aforementioned Bobblehead is. Once you're in, you can do a couple other quests. But once you've done the four slave acquisitions, the leader tells you about a discerning client who wants young females. He doesn't spell it out for you but you can pretty much guess.

Why would you think some rich bastard would hire slavers to acquire small girls? They aren't old enough to breed, and older children of either gender would be better suited to manual labor (or, you know, adults). Children require emotional and financial support. Why would he want a bunch of random small girls around? Do you actually have a theory or are you just defending pedophiles with FUD?

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Small hands to put watches together. Work in the coal mines to squeeze into small spaces.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works -4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Do you actually have a theory

I don't need a theory. I'm taking the game at face value, not projecting my own purient interests onto it.

are you just defending pedophiles with FUD?

I haven't defended you

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Easy block.

On Reddit you can treat people like that, there are millions more, but by going around projecting your perversions onto others, you'll quickly find yourself blocked by the more helpful people here. If this is you during the holidays, imagine how you are the rest of the year, but I'll leave that to others.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 6 points 1 day ago

That's in terms of games.

If you look at the content on Steam, there is lots of pro-russian genocidal imperialism messaging (even in charity DLC releases), Nazi stuff and annoying fake anti-woke posturing.

They don't do anything about it because of their alleged committment to "free speech". I find that unconvincing, they simply can't be bothered.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Without playing/seeing what Horses is like, it's difficult to evaluate Valve's decision.

That being said there is tons of weird and fucked up NSFW stuff on Steam.

Banning a transgressive game seemingly without any explicit content seems excessive.

From my perspective, this is another reason it's a bad idea to have an American company (even a somewhat user-focused one like Valve) be a steward of modern digital services. Local culture puts too much emphasis on the theatrical elements of morality. Not to mention the challenges faced by the locals in areas such as corruption and rule of law (Valve trying to cheat on refunds, adding mandatory arbitration clauses, Soviet-style kangaroo courts essentially, and operating unlicensed gambling schemes).

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

The trailer includes a girl riding a naked man with a horse mask and footage from a horse humping another.

This would not be the hill I choose to die upon to make a point about bad American companies - criticizing Steam for removing a horror game involving explicit nudity with borderline traces of pedophilia and bestiality in the very trailer.

[–] Sas@piefed.blahaj.zone 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It was rejected because in the build they submitted for review a minor was riding a naked person with a horse mask and valve saw that as sexual which i find fair considering ponyplay being a thing. I understand valve wanting to distance themselves from anything involving a minor that could be seen as sexual

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The issue with the child was fixed in a later build. A build that Valve doesn’t want to review.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

You are really giving off "it's not pedophilia, it's hebephilia" vibes here...

Yes, technically, they fixed an issue, that doesn't fix how it was able to become an issue in the first place. The developers are either going for "very, very thinly disguised fetish" or completely absentminded outrage farming in a very bad way.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't think bumping the child's age to a twenty something old women counts as hebephilia. But hey, you're the fucking expert here.

We have since changed the character in the scene to be a twenty-something woman, both to avoid the juxtaposition and more importantly because the dialogue delivered in that scene, which deals with the societal structure in the world of HORSES, works much better when delivered by an older character.

https://www.horses.wtf/BannedFromSteam/

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Nope, now you are giving it off more.

nervously laughs while moving away

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 16 points 1 day ago

If that's the case I can't really fault Valve here.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

From my perspective, this is another reason it’s a bad idea to have an American company (even a somewhat user-focused one like Valve) be a steward of modern digital services. Local culture puts too much emphasis on the theatrical elements of morality.

Yeah, I hear you. It should be based in a sane country like Australia or the United Kingdom or China or Japan.

Point is, making this an 'America bad' problem is just ignoring that it could be so much worse if it was based elsewhere.

[–] alessandro@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

The problem is "based anywhere": no party based on a single nation should have censorship control on the global market of a technology (high-end gaming on PC in this case). The problem is not "America bad", but the presence of America in control of many modern technologies (social network, AI, advertisement, media etc.) makes U.S. a recurring target for bigotry that mess with the overall market (this don't mean that U.S. have a global-wise issue with bigotry, things could be worse is so many key market were in the hands of any religious zealot country (being Muslim, Christian, Hebrew etc.).

We're are losing a world that was heading to technological decentralization (emails, websites, interconnected communities (such as forums, irc, bulletin boards), cryptocurrencies etc: this is going to screw with everyone, U.S. citizen themselves also.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

The issue is the power, not who wields it.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

You're welcome to perceive what I am saying as a reflexive "America bad" outburst driven by current developments.

And I will take the liberty of saying that it is possible that there is significant nuance to my arguement.

Not to mention that I've lived for several years across multiple countries in North America, Europe and Asia and visited another 25 countries.

Btw, I am not only flexing with the "I have travelled the world!!!" comments. :)

I am also pointing out that it would be difficult for me to enjoy living/travelling in other countries if I reflexively said things like "This place sucks! What a shithole!".

[–] Malix@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They do have a website up - https://www.horses.wtf/

by their own description:

CONTENT WARNING: This game contains scenes of physical violence, psychological abuse, gory imagery (mutilation, blood), depictions of slavery, physical and psychological torture, domestic abuse, sexual assault, suicide, and misogyny.

The game looks like it's about keeping people on a ranch, with horse masks on.

I guess the banhammer was swung because of sexual violence and mutilation of subjugated slaves?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 20 points 1 day ago

From another article posted about this earlier, the version of the game sent to Valve for review had a minor as the main protagonist.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 9 points 1 day ago

There was a quite a bit of discussion about that on another post: https://lemmy.world/post/39297021

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago

Based on the trailer seems like a game version of a gore/torture/faux-snuff horror movie.