this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
559 points (99.6% liked)

News

33724 readers
2929 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archivists have saved and uploaded copies of the 60 Minutes episode new CBS editor-in-chief Bari Weiss ordered be shelved as a torrent and multiple file sharing sites after an international distributor aired the episode.

The moves show how difficult it may be for CBS to stop the episode, which focused on the experience of Venezuelans deported to El Salvadorian mega prison CECOT, from spreading across the internet. Bari Weiss stopped the episode from being released Sunday even after the episode was reviewed and checked multiple times by the news outlet, according to an email CBS correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi sent to her colleagues.

Archive: http://archive.today/ete4M

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] who@feddit.org 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Posted to YouTube a few hours ago, by the office of New Jersey senator Cory Booker:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiehEMlNiCI

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 164 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The Streisand Effect sends its regards.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yes, but also... this is a kinda unique variation in that it wasn't already public when they tried to kill it.

... and, I'm not sure who "archivists" might refer to but I suspect that whoever they are may have undertaken significant risk.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article says it was released online and if you were in Canada you could watch it. Also it doesn't say it here but another news source said the week prior it was advertised through commercials, ads, and online that it would be airing on so and so date and time.

Once I saw who stopped it, I kept thinking back to John Oliver's episode on her a few months ago and thought wow that didnt take long.

If it was posted ~~in Canada~~ anywhere it was posted everywhere. Thus is the nature of the internet.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sounds like an "international distributor" aired the episode, so it was already public, at least in whatever country it aired in. The only risk they took is perhaps getting their "international distribution" contract cancelled.

If it aired publicly, and nobody involved in the distribution is involved in the "archiving", there may be very little that can be done about it, short of sending the USS Trump to carpetbomb their country.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Valid point, but maybe a little less unique than it seems, at least if you look at the original Barbra Streisand situation. The photo of her house was originally so obscure and hidden that realistically essentially nobody had ever seen it, until she sued the photographer to have it removed. While it was technically "publicly available" before that it was in such an obscure dataset of coastal erosion examples that it had only been downloaded 6 times, which in terms of being "public on the internet", effectively rounds down to zero.

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

And those 6 times it were said to be her lawyer who viewed them.

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe the archivists are data hoarders aka pirates.

And so they're outside the USA.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago

Actually since my comment it's become clear that the show was aired in canada.

When I posted that comment it sounded like the show had been canned but someone on the production team had leaked it.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago

I don't watch 60 Minutes but I watched this episode.

[–] Snowcano@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

“Tell Bari Weiss. I want her to know it was me.”

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

This is the best advertizing they can get to spread it wide and far.

[–] Trabic@lemmy.today 84 points 1 day ago

If you'd like a 🧲:

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:r26oym3csssgcjov7tfnlxls6m6c6ckn&dn=60minutes-cecotsegment&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt1.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce

[–] who@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seems like a perfect video for Peertube.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That'll ensure nobody sees it.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It will be more than how many people will see it by being just a torrent.

If it's on peertube, you can just send a link to people and it'll stream right on the browser (granted it has enough peers which I'm pretty sure it will).

[–] Wigglesworth@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 day ago

Nah, nah, someone does.

...surely. Someone does, anybody?

They always need more content. This would be a great addition.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Bari Weiss Killed

damn i gotta stop reading headlines right to left

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 42 points 1 day ago

“Goverment silence is a statement, not a VETO. Their refusal to be interviewed is a tactical maneuver designed to kill the story,”…

Couldn’t have said it better myself.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Get fucked Bari!

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If she gets more people to watch 60 minutes, has she not done her job? 😂

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're not watching 60 minutes. They're watching a story elsewhere that 60 Minutes didn't want to air. So basically 60 Minutes did all the work and gets none of the rewards here. They don't get the ratings they don't get the eyes and they don't get the advertising dollars.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Advertising and ratings are toxic metrics to bind journalism to.

The proper way to proceed is to build systems and infrastructure that replace these vacuous incentives.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

But that's what pays for the content in our current system. Publicly funded journalism is my preference but the problem is some governments bend those to their will and we don't get true reporting. I agree with you that advertisers metrics are bullshit and we should do better but I just don't see where we can go.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Bwahaha. Love it. More of this!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Make it famous!

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where can I find it? They put so much effort into hiding it. Gotta watch it