this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
149 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

77925 readers
2430 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Opinion piece

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 18 points 17 hours ago

Narrator: "They didn't."

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 39 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

No.

When the AI bubble bursts, those with money will invest and hoover up wealth and assets at a 90% discount. The vast majority will continue to scrape whatever life they can together and try to survive, and the government will enforce ever more draconian austerity policies.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago

Don’t forget the part where taxpayers bail out the billionaires!

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yes. This will hurt mostly small investors, wage workers in everything less essential than factory jobs, service sphere, such people.

Humans that will take back control already have much of that control, the difference mostly lies in slavery being formally illegal.

But the biggest effect will be similar to that of the dotcom bubble, I think.

Ah, whatever. I'm just bored of this stage of development, let them be done with it and show the results. I want to see what happens after. It must be something interesting. There must be some movement in the opposite direction, if temporary, like the Web in the 00s for some time had this emotional flavor of a rainy Tokyo street at spring, and peer-to-peer networks had lots of popularity.

I think with all the doom and gloom we should remember that the next stage is always interesting if it doesn't involve more murder and torture.

Say, when this bubble bursts, conversational LLM-based user interfaces will, instead of the solution for every problem solving none, become just another thing. That might be good, it might make typical UX sane again.

Also it's almost logical that communication with another person is also how you'd want to communicate with a service. EDIT: So that they'll exist is good.

Then after that we might see less of those very bloat and omnipresent telemetry that nobody likes. They will be less of "the new digital oil" and more of bother that doesn't buy that much.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

When the AI bubble bursts, those with money will invest and hoover up wealth and assets at a 90% discount.

The GPUs will go fast, but not the data centers that nobody wants for any other purpose. So much for the capital assets.

The intangibles and "intellectual property" will be reset to a value much closer to zero. And if this cuts a few billionaires down to centimillionaires, so much the better. Fuck 'em.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

This checks out

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no, not me, I never lost control.

[–] hamFoilHat@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Am I face to face with the man who sold the world?

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Lol. Lmao even.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

LOL, like we took control after the DotCom crash or The Great Recession, or the pandemic.

We can only hope to gain control by organizing and exercizing our labour power. Economically and by extension in AI. Until then, the political class would keep serving whoever holds capital at the moment, bail them out with our surplus and pretend to regulate them.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’re talking about humans. Those are mammals with value.

You and I are the working class. We are not humans.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I forgot my place.

[–] WatchfulConsole@sh.itjust.works 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Nope. Once the bubble bursts the squeeze-out of the middle class will be truly begun as pensions fail and governments on the edge of default are forced to squeeze them to repay their debts to the wealthy.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=pUKaB4P5Qns

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago

More likely, it'll shave a percent or two off GDP for a year or so, and that'll be it.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 18 points 1 day ago

You'll lose your job through cascading cuts and pay more in cost of living, giving the rich another massive opportunity to harvest up assets within a 30-year period.

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Barely the same agents with most of the resources will rush into capitalise it, "control" from a few is a perpetual war...

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago

This article is just a ploy to get people to lose more money upwards.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Humans being in control is what got us in this mess in the first place though.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm curious to see how it will go with Albania. They have Diella Ai system in place. It's an Ai government.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

https://eadaily.com/en/news/2025/12/05/the-worlds-first-ai-minister-got-caught-on-bribes

(Ok, the above article is mostly not true, the story was made up by an Onion-style satirical portal.)

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 12 hours ago

Ow well, I'm not surprised haha. And then they claim:

She's not corrupt, she's just hyperadaptive

😆

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t think I would call the (tech) elite running the show today “human beings”

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

Oh, they're human all right. The worst kind of human.