this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
511 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

10148 readers
1489 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

I would have a hard time describing my political affiliation. I would guess "leaning libertarian-socialist", but I don't fully subscribe to all so IDK in which category I fit in.

  • I like the idea of workers owning the means of production, but don't like production for use (that never works). Simply remove the C-suite leeches and distribute their paycheck and parts of the profit among workers that actually produced them.
  • States and governments can stay and should mainly act as a developmental/economic guide. Taxes are okay, but they have to be spent in a way that benefits the public, not bailouts for banks or corporations. They should pay for social security, roads, healthcare, schools and universities, imports/exports, stuff like that.
  • I'm not foolish enough to believe that humans can behave themselves, so there needs to be a way to hold perpetrators accountable in front of a court of peers. But as long as somebody doesn't harm or endanger someone else (or the environment because that affects everyone), they should be able to do whatever they damn please, including owning things.
  • There needs to be a wealth cap. Period.
  • Exceptions need to be made for goods and property that are required by everyone, like food, water and housing. Buying houses and apartments as assets is morally deplorable because all you do is enrich yourself on other's basic needs.
  • Why are private equity firms legal again?

So what am I?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Well I’m a lot more conservative but usually call myself progressive. I don’t blame corps or ceos, nor do I think large scale workers owning the means of production can work. It’s all a failure to regulate the markets, and a failure of tax policy

It wouldn’t take many changes to

  • restore a progressive tax ladder
  • reduce income inequality
  • add worker protections
  • mandate healthcare one away or another

Capitalism can be a useful function if the market is regulated for the good of the people. Power dynamics can be ok if there are protections against abuses. Wealth inequality can be a good force to drive capitalism if the excesses are moderated. But things like education and healthcare should be a right afforded to all citizens

You need an Elon musk to make Tesla happen, but that would still be true if he were limited to say ten times the income of his lowest paid employee, rather than 1,000,000 times whatever he’s at now.

You need a responsible government to guide the market toward long terms good that capitalism can’t handle.

You need a strong enough government to protect employees and consumers from corporate exploitation, and to prevent corporate ownership

And somehow we need to restore the effectiveness’s of the balance of powers we believed in for the last two centuries

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

A rational and compassionate human being.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It means “I don’t want to hear your politics, I don’t want you to criticize my politics, I just want to keep acting like my support of shitty things isn’t my responsibility.”

[–] Karjalan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Yeah... When I was on the dating apps I pretty much treated "centrist" as "conservative" for a filter

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That is a sign natural selection has selected them for the male loneliness epidemic

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Ahhh, poor Democrats. (30% of voters)

How do they ever win an election?

The Republicans (30% of voters) have a secret right-wing army of Independents (40% of voters), that's hmmm 30% Rs plus 40% Is, why, that's like 70%! That's crazy

Fortunately, the Ds are super smart. That's how they win even when outnumbered by over 2 to 1 , clever observations like this prove it (taps temple).

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

As an independent voter I take offense to this.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I guess no one here has ever lived in a red state

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I've lived in two and spoke towards progressive politics all the time. 90% of the time people are receptive if they're a smart and genuine person. Obviously I'm not approaching or hanging around someone with the maga hat with Trump flags and punisher stickers.

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Well, than ~90% of people I know are idiots.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Does the punisher symbol alone associate a person with maga?? Damn.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

It's a red flag for "approves of police brutality against those people" at the very least, but context is important. Single Punisher skull on their Dodge Ram? MAGA gun fetishist. If there's at least one other comic reference the odds are way better of them being fine actually.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

So, nobody here actually used online dating? Here in the deep red South, "not political" means liberal and don't talk your MAGA shit at me.

[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

For the uninformed, what happens if you put liberal?

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Not on any dating apps, but people I know who describe themselves as non-political are just so sick of it they can't bear to talk about it anymore, which I totally get. Especially since any good discussion always ends up ruined by someone who's very "political" but only gets their news from Facebook or something worse.

[–] awfulawful@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I've never met someone who says they're not political who is actually not political. They just prefer to think about the things they care about as "above politics" or don't want the heat for their opinions.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

I'm not political, I just think you should work your whole life for rich people and get a small fraction of that in return.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago

I say not political because I haven't studied our politics and I know basically nothing about it. Otherwise I'd get "What's your opinion on what [name I never heard of] posted on their Facebook profile yesterday morning?"
Perhaps not so specific, but I don't know the people and what's going on.

It's a lot of history, specific events, constantly something new, and I have to study other things too.

[–] PurpleFanatic@quokk.au 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This puzzles me especially when it’s a trans or enby person on a dating app… I’m like: girl wtf

That's called lateral violence

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 40 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Mental exercise:

There is a serial arsonist going around

A house is on fire

You meet a stranger who says they don't like to discuss whether the fire should be put out or not, nor whether the arsonist should be stopped.

If this person isn't the arsonist, their actions (or lack there of) benefit only the arsonist. They are, at least, an arsonist supporter.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Most people I talk to like this, in the analogy, used to be firefighters, but realized for every fire they put out, some literal idiot lights 3 more, and to them, they end up feeling like they're the only one who cares. Pun intended, but they're literally burnt out.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

What if they are fed up with how many people support the arsonist in their area while personally feeling the arsonist should be publicly executed, avoiding discussion on the fire is their way to avoid getting overly angry with every single person they talk to who keeps insisting on talking about their support for the arsonist.

Or everyone keeps on talking about pro-anti arsonist, and they are one of the few that think dealing with the fire first might be a good idea instead.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Complacence is compliance.

If everyone in your town was pro-dog rape, would you prefer to never speak up? Would you prefer to stay silent while your dog lives every day at risk?

If I'm angry at someone I just say swear words at them. I don't hide it and I don't try to avoid getting angry.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

meh, i'm a registered independent who votes democrat. I'll never join the dnc, but i won't vote for republicans. I don't particularly like talking politics with people either. I don't relish circle jerking over hating politicians, I just get fucking angry.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 12 hours ago

I mainly dislike the increasing authoritarian push we are seeing from all sides in the UK. I don't give a shit about your left or right politics if I am not even allowed to look at a fucking meme without verifying my ID. After that the next priority would probably be environmental, only then followed by anything to do with the economy.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 15 hours ago

"Not political" in 2025+ America means they have the mental capacity of the average Idiocracy civilian.

Like, I'm sure they just rewatch people getting hit in the balls all day, every day.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 15 points 15 hours ago

"not political" means they are okay enough with the way things are that they don't need to engage with it. It's conservative. Not necessarily far right reactionary that wants to change things for the worse, but they don't care about other people. (Or, rarely, don't recognize or care about their own suffering)

It's an idiot or monster's stance.

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Real talk, it's what I used to put in my profile maybe 2 years ago.

I didn't watch the news much, I had always stayed out of the discourse and I had refused to apply a 1-dimensional label to my beliefs.

Put plainly, I was privileged enough that politics rarely affected me directly, and I think until recently there were a lot of people like that.

One day in 2023, I took a political alignment test and found out I was a democratic socialist and it just so happened I was living in one (UK). Hence why I never felt the need to mess with things.

Of course, no country is perfect, and as I met more people, especially trans and disabled people, I discovered that there was a lot of terrible shit going on in my country and that's where I finally got my awakening. I also started watching more political YouTube.

Since then, I've veered slightly further left I'm involved in advocacy and I'm proud to wear the "Left" label as someone who cares for others and believes we can all do better.

I still believe that left and right are a bit reductive, but I understand now that it's more like the more of the things you believe in, the further on that axis you go. For example, the UK's Green Party is bringing together some conservative environmentalists with leftist progressives in their interests to keep our green spaces and maintain traditional trades and crafts.

Anyway, the point is some "non-political" people are just sheltered. That said, you have to be extremely sheltered in the US to not experience the upheaval currently happening.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

I took the test and I’m not particularly surprised at my result.

I’m strongly of the opinion that a lot of people simply do not have the bandwidth to be deeply involved in politics, even if it is in their best interests. We have so many people in the US drowning in debt, stress, unresolved mental health crises, and uncertainty about how they can afford the next big repair on their house/appliances/car/body that they do not have the luxury of spending time and energy advocating for the changes that would improve their lives.

I think of it like the airplane oxygen masks - you need to secure your own before you help others. It’s hard to expect people to organize and push for monumental change when they are a paycheck or two away from homelessness. I don’t see an easy way forward unless a lot of people are willing to sacrifice.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 14 hours ago

Aware enough to feel ashamed.

Selfish enough to still vote for it.

[–] MrStankov@lemmy.world 62 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

"I don't want to think about politics, but when I have to I lean heavily right."

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 42 points 21 hours ago

Trump rallies and conservatives in a nutshell

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 23 points 21 hours ago

Undercover Trumper. You shouldn't talk politics, but announcing it is a red flag.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

You can't have no stance on social constructs you've been introduced to. The moment it's existence has been made aware to you by other people, you now have a stance, even if that's to dissociate from it. "Not political" doesn't clearly say anything, but I'm inclined to think they don't like hearing the stance of other's—what political discourse is—implying they may actually have a very strong and unwavering stance but they don't recognise it.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

It could also mean they'd rather talk about pretty much anything else.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

You can ignore politics, but politics will not ignore you.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 11 points 15 hours ago

If politics make life shit for everyone except a special little group of people which benefits from this human created catastrophe, who do you think announces they are 'nonpolitical' or 'doesn't want to talk about politics'? Certainly not those who are being crushed by the political decisions, but rather the benefactors, don't you think?

Because if they talk about politics they dig their tombs