this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
114 points (97.5% liked)

World News

51665 readers
3235 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 60 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe make life suck less so they have time and energy to be horny rather than make life suck more:

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 25 points 4 days ago

Not the Chinese way. They’ll be forcing opposite sex marriage or jail pretty soon.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

'Condom Tax' is sensationalist BS.

Previously under the 1-child policy, Condoms had a specific exemption from tax, that's been removed and now they fall under the same taxes as other goods.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

So they’re adding tax onto condom sales?

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Did anything else get removed? If condoms are the only thing that got the tax on them reinstated how is calling it a condom tax, a tax on condoms, not correct?

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, good luck with that. Still gonna be cheaper to pay that tax than to have a kid, never mind the lack of time for said kids due to their infamous 996 work week. They're trying to manipulate people instead of addressing the real problems keeping them from wanting to have kids. Typical authoritarian mindset.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Typical authoritarian mindset

Like banning abortions?

Yep - that, too.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

And that always worked like a charm, yes.

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe be a country that doesn’t suck and see if that helps.

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 days ago

These days I'd take living in China instead of living in the US, especially if I'm thinking of having kids.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

Aww does the meat grinder want more meat?? That’s so sad.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Chinese people pay a 13% sales tax on contraceptives from 1 January

I seriously doubt that that's going to have a major impact.

Observers appear divided on the aim of the tax overhaul. The idea that a tax hike on condoms will impact birth rates is "overthinking it", says demographer Yi Fuxian from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

He believes Beijing is keen to collect taxes "wherever it can" as it battles a housing market slump and growing national debt.

Consumption taxes are regressive, but sometimes they can be more politically-viable if they can be presented as fighting social ills.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sin_tax

A sin tax (also known as a sumptuary tax, or vice tax) is an excise tax specifically levied on certain goods deemed harmful to society and individuals, such as alcohol, tobacco, drugs, soft drinks, sugar, fast foods, fat, meat, gambling, vaping, cannabis (wherever legal for recreational use) and pornography.[1]

In contrast to Pigouvian taxes, which are to pay for the damage to society caused by these goods, sin taxes increase the price in an effort to decrease the use of these goods. Increasing a sin tax is often more popular than increasing other taxes. However, these taxes have often been criticized for burdening the poor and disproportionately taxing the physically and mentally dependent.[2]

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It's gonna escalate to bans pretty soon when they realize taxing it alone doesn't work.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Pff, condoms. Get that pullout game straight boy

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The pull out method doesn’t work.

I know this because I have a friend who swears by it. He has four ooops-babies.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 7 points 4 days ago

He might be really bad at it though.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

More reliable than the pill if you can't trust the person taking it.

Source: one oops-baby from "yes I'm on the pill". None from pulling out.

I'm convinced most people who have babies with the pull out method didn't actually pull out in time. There is of course extra risk if you ejaculate and then go for another round without clearing the pipes first.

Don't rely on any of this though. I know people who do it with strangers too. I've only ever really done it in relationships where if there's a baby eventually, it's not the end of the world.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 4 points 3 days ago

I got my partner pregnant from penetration without ejaculation. We would fuck a bit then put on a condom to finish. Turns out that doesn't work reliably (not a huge problem for us, since we were planning on having a kid a few months later anyway).