this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
324 points (99.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

66151 readers
104 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Avenging5@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

just host it on tor?

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 195 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 9 points 6 days ago

And half of them are blocked by German ISPs because of a coalition of people that decide what is and isn't allowed without any government supervision.

[–] tty84@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] trk@aussie.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

Telegram is very diligent with deleting piracy channels, I'd say it's so unreliable as not to be worth the effort of setting up.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 114 points 1 week ago (2 children)

DEFINITELY due to the Spotify breach.

Honestly I'm surprised they kept their org domain this long

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Nah. AA themselves say they don't think it is due to Spotify. And it would be too quick, they say they were kicked based on a legal request, hardly something you expect to be carried out in, what, two weeks at most?

Book publishers are unlikely to be any less ruthless than Spotify. Remember how they wanted to fuck over Internet Archive (and partly succeeded). This is more likely to be their doing.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given how things work, they should have created another "brand" just for the spotify breach (e.g. Audio Hub). Annas Archive was just going so well...

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 9 points 6 days ago

Anna's Audio was right there, man.

[–] vpol@feddit.uk 83 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Other people invade other countries and not get punished, but people caring to make knowledge more available (especially to not rich people) get punished.

I know that's the system working as expected, but ughh

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you need a quick heuristic "courts are the bad guys from Saturday morning cartoons". They are straight up the enemy of all things good.

Its not 100% correct, but you'll think about it 99% less and be right 98% as often

[–] qwestjest78@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't get why they did the Spotify thing. It was obviously going to put a massive target on their back

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 1 week ago

It was very much complementary to their already existing archival goals.

I think they felt they had good enough opsec and went for it, which is really based IMO

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They already had a big target on their back. Sure, scraping Spotify made that larger, but given that their aims are explicitly political, I think there's a lot of value in not being overly cautious and using takedowns as a way to bolster the resiliency of your service.

Domain takedowns are inevitable, even if they'd just continued with their existing archival efforts. That's why, when I found I wasn't able to access the .org domain over the weekend, I just went to https://annas-archive.se/ instead.

Edit: wrote one of the old domains (.gs) because I just use what's bookmarked and got mixed up. It was .se that I used

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

.gs is not one of the currently listed domains. Are you sure that's a real one?

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

That's the old one they temporarily switched to that got taken down; the current options are annas-archive.li, annas-archive.se, annas-archive.pm, and annas-archive.in.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

You're right, it was the .se one I used and I misremembered when writing my comment. Though this mistake highlights why adding sites like this to your bookmarks is important. Opportunistic scams are always common when a big domain goes down, and mistakes are easy to make

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 week ago

same, like they could've just used a different pseudonym?

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 49 points 1 week ago

Do they have an onion address?

[–] Dhar@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For me I can’t connect to it

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow, they are really taking everything down.

[–] southernwolf@pawb.social 9 points 1 week ago

No in this case it's called the hug of death.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are these the same people that refused to suspend Kiwi Farms and 8chan?

[–] vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 27 points 1 week ago

The copyreich above all.