Can I suggest you have some rules around AI assisted code? Like explicitly marking them at a minimum?
Otherwise, sounds good, hope it takes off.
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
82 points (100.0% liked)
Programming
24519 readers
255 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm trying to think of a rule against using AI or even the rule of at least documenting where you use AI. There was one project where I tried to be diligent about including GitHub copilot as a co-author but then I slipped and forgot and there's no point in bothering.
I think I'm just going to strongly encourage disclosing AI usage but there can be no requirements.
You want purity tests for people sharing a things they did? 🙄
Maybe whether they asked any forums for help? Do you want to know who they voted for as well?
AI written code ≠ work you've done yourself
I don't want to read vibe code, I want to see a humans code.
You know full well that AI vibe coding is a completely different level of assist to "forums for help".
Might want to check out !fedigrow@lemmy.zip. They link to some resources for sharing this or growing the new community.