this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
684 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

80634 readers
3192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The article title is click bait here is the full article:

Wondering what your career looks like in our increasingly uncertain, AI-powered future? According to Palantir CEO Alex Karp, it’s going to involve less of the comfortable office work to which most people aspire, a more old fashioned grunt work with your hands.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, Karp insisted that the future of work is vocational — not just for those already in manufacturing and the skilled trades, but for the majority of humanity.

In the age of AI, Karp told attendees at a forum, a strong formal education in any of the humanities will soon spell certain doom.

“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

Karp, who himself holds humanities degrees from the elite liberal arts institutions of Haverford College and Stanford Law, will presumably be alright. With a net worth of $15.5 billion — well within the top 0.1 percent of global wealth owners — the Palantir CEO has enough money and power to live like a feudal lord (and that’s before AI even takes over.)

The rest of us, he indicates, will be stuck on the assembly line, building whatever the tech companies require.

“If you’re a vocational technician, or like, we’re building batteries for a battery company… now you’re very valuable, if not irreplaceable,” Karp insisted. “I mean, y’know, not to divert to my usual political screeds, but there will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training.”

Now, there’s nothing wrong with vocational work or manufacturing. The global economy runs on these jobs. But in a theoretical world so fundamentally transformed by AI that intellectual labor essentially ceases to exist, it’s telling that tech billionaires like Karp see the rest of humanity as their worker bees.

It seems that the AI revolution never seems to threaten those who stand to profit the most from it — just the 99.9 percent of us building their batteries.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] canuck666777@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

AI can't even crank out a decent powerpoint presentation after my giving it explicit prompts and their shit AI's going to take over jobs? I hope their stock crashes soon!

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

If he keeps this up, he may have to learn to work without his head like an aristocrat.

[–] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

This dude is going to lose his nasal cavity from his coke addiction.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I’m fine with going back to a way of life that doesn’t include any of these psychopaths or their shit technology

[–] asdf8901@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 6 hours ago

It will include their technology, it will also include requirements that those maintaining the systems are capable beyond English Lit degrees...

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

These assholes are pushing the worker bees into another 1789 France.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Bees will actually kill their queen at times.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Their dream is to have us build their Death Stars. We should crush their dreams.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

They're stealing the power of information for themselves and kicking us back to manual labour jobs, until they steal that with robots too and we have zero means of engaging with the economy that controls all the world resources, so we just end up dying off, leaving them with the whole fucking planet to themselves.

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

When any AI hyper rants about AI/AGI ask this 1 simple question.

what happens to income.

Thing is capitalism requires income. Without it, it collapses. We have already sold future income (debt) and attention (ads and personal information) is sold as well. If AGI occurs: robots occur; and the snake eats itself.

It's going nowhere. Relax, touch some grass and let the hype cycle disappear.

If it does happen, the discussion becomes all about income not how many employees we fired last month to make line go up. Cause next month line is ded.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 6 hours ago
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Capitalists are so annoying. The hubris to assume we can accelerate climate change and ignore it and everything will just be hunky dory. It's astounding these ding dongs think they're outside the Earth system and not a part of it.

[–] L_N@piefed.ca 40 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

I don't understand why we don't revolt against the billionaires.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Because these billionaires convinced the manual workers that intellectual workers are the real problem, so now they're cheering that the "gay office workers will finally be cured of their homosexuality through pain therapy" (I know way too many people believing "getting spoiled as a kid" or not being taught how to be a man is responsible for queerness, which includes "not being the manliest man on the earth").

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Not even revolt, I don’t understand why we just willingly hand them power. Like, half of Canada voted for the far-right Conservative party and the other half voted for the center-right, lower-case conservative party. It’s going as expected but we just keep doing it.

[–] L_N@piefed.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

They won't get much from the Canadian conservative far right. These people are all for cutting public services and rampant privatization... Someone would have to explain to me why someone who isn't rich would want to vote for them.

[–] DizzyMoth@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Many people live with the idea that one day they could became part of that 0.1 percent, and i mean it's hard to blame them all of us independent from where we are have been feed with this kind of propaganda our entire life

[–] Iunnrais@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I actually don’t think this is true. I used to think it was true, but after seeing more and more people I think it’s simpler than that. It’s a belief in the justness of hierarchy— the “great chain of being” from medieval thought, where people on the top both deserve to be there by right of being there, and it is right to submit to them.

On a certain level, I even see the point. Despite anarchist clams to the contrary, leaders are important, necessary even to accomplish anything greater than a single person can manage. Even kids can see this first hand the first time they get assigned a group project by their teacher, or try to win a game of sports. But it’s too easy to twist “we need a good leader” into the tautology of “the leader is good, right, and justified because he’s the leader”.

If everyone rebelled against leadership all the time, there’d be no leadership, and people do need leaders. But at the same time, leaders can be or become shitstains that need to be rebelled against. It’s difficult, and I don’t think being reductive about the difficulty is right.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

These people operate by the "rules for thee, not for me" rule.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... this guy went from his early years as a self-professed socialist who went to protests and believed in social justice... to the most hyper-capitalist "let them eat cake" nutjob that you could imagine. What a world we live in.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It is physically impossible to become a billionaire if you're not evil.

[–] mossyrua@mastodon.ie 9 points 13 hours ago

@JcbAzPx @ChaoticEntropy

“You don’t make a billion dollars, you take a billion dollars.”

AOC

[–] guilhermegnzaga@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 7 hours ago

“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

Just keep tryin bruh....

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Well, it does take hands to raise the guillotine's blade . . . true. Might also take hands to lock billionaires into the guillotine. So, thanks for the suggestion!

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago

"Saying the quiet part out loud" moment, because they don't feel like they need to be quiet. They're untouchable.

[–] hamid@crazypeople.online 18 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

He is lying about its capabilities to protect the stock price

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I think he's vocally self delusional. He does actually believe it, but he's incentivized to delude himself into that belief. And incentivized to say it publicly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 25 points 17 hours ago

I'm tired of these techbro cultists without any humanity being in power at all.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Of course he craps on philosophers. What good is it philosophy for somebody without ethics?

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 7 hours ago

Palantir only cares about one philosophy. The "philosophy of God". You may like some enlightenment figures like Kant or Leibniz, since the sense of hierarchy is powerful on the epoch, but that's about it. You're supposed to reverb/echo the "philosophy of God" or get out! Critical thinking without hierarchical thinking is just a pain on the ass for them, so you can "go home and eat our metaphysical shit" or submit to the Mathematical God which will create all the rules and philosophy we need.

I guess that's what he means.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

as a CS grad and having worked in software for 10 yrs.. this is just delusion.

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

TL;DR: Tech billionaires like Karp see the rest of humanity as their worker bees.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

All while all the corporations tried to adapt AI are getting burned with it.

Replacing me my ass. It's just a lot of anti-intellectualist workers are cheering on the tech, because the ruling class convinced them that the "elite" meant "person with ternary education".

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The rest of us, he indicates, will be stuck on the assembly line, building whatever the tech companies require.

Meanwhile..

China is accelerating the rollout of fully automated "dark factories," where production continues non-stop without lighting, human workers or shift changes. https://e.vnexpress.net/news/tech/tech-news/no-lights-no-workers-ai-powered-dark-factories-are-reshaping-china-s-manufacturing-4921224.html

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 10 hours ago

And China, for all its flaws, won't throw its people under the bus.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 19 hours ago

I studied poetry, painting, and music so that my sons could study mathematics and commerce, and their sons could work long hours on the assembly - without having ever studied anything - so that they can consume slop generated by AI that was pushed on everyone by people who studied commerce, created by people who studied mathematics, and trained on the works of those who studied poetry, painting, and music.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 38 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

There's nothing billionaire oligarchs fear more than people who are capable of thinking for themselves. Of course they want to destroy the humanities...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›