this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
910 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

9587 readers
1641 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Wait are you telling me a chicken dinner and juice is more attainable than a home?? Could that be why?

There’s a reason young people are travelling and using their savings on entertainment, we know we will never own. Not until we take housing by force, so what’s the point of saving? I can’t even save enough to keep up with interest. So yeah when I’m old I’ll be poor and the government will have to deal with me

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

GenZ complains about having so much debt and not enough income but they keep buying food! How can they expect to succeed when they waste their money so frivolously?!

..... That's what this headline reads like to me. How dare you buy food with the money you should be spending on the interest you owe to the owners of the country.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Reading the actual article, the lunacy and delusion is real. You don't even get three paragraphs in and they're using a sales engineer's thoughts to represent young people as a whole.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Splurging on double ply toilet paper that is free of bark. Recklessly spending on biannual toothbrushs. carelessly using their lunch break to eat instead of adopting mico-hussles. foolishly agreeing to pay rent instead of taking money out of their grandfather's equity built trust fund to buy expansive rental properties.

why are they so bad with money?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

It’s depressing just how quickly and comprehensively Jeff Bezos has managed to destroy the WSJ. It used to be respected internationally, now it’s just a grubby little clickfarm.

[–] Quexotic@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

"Splurging“ on the absolute cheapest most preservative laiden meat available, cheapeer than fucking Spam, and Gut healthy jucis because they can't afford to go to a doctor.

Fucking ghouls.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Headline in two years: Gen Z'ers are splurging on food instead of giving their money to the rich.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Gen Z and millennials are splurging on breathing air.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"GenZ struggling to survive in the lower levels of MegaCity5. Their blood is too low in iron to keep the immortal rich alive."

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 1 day ago

GenZ not eating nutritious meals is the leading cause of rejection for Soylent processing.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah that might be the most accurate to the blaming tone these kinds of articles write with and to what they will take from us.

Just need to jazz it up with some homemade slang to hide the sad bits and the immortal rich part.

"GenZ struggling in well stocked MegaCity5; "Fecal-de-Cal" diet blamed for lack of macro nutrients during their mandatory weekly Blood-Up donations."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tehmics@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Splurging" on one of the most prolific loss leaders in grocery is certainly one way to say it. We're buying them because it's the cheapest way to eat

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Up next: Gen Z splurging on costco hotdogs and mi goreng instant noodles.

[–] JollyBrancher@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You mean the rotisserie chickens that are $5-6, compared to lunch meat being at 10-12/lb? Splurging on that rotisserie chicken purchase?

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is a reason we think boomers are out of touch.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They bought houses with high school diplomas for 6 walnuts. Why can't you kids do the same?

Try to explain to them that we will never be as weathly as they are and how we will receive 0 inheritance from them because they planned out how to spend their entire retirement savings not knowing what end of life care actually costs.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That rotisserie chicken that I can stretch into like three to five meals, including making broth? That one?

[–] TheOakTree@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Good ol' rotisserie chicken, rice, n beans. Sauce of choice. A legendary combination.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I make black bean based veggie patties; not because I'm a vegetarian, but because a can of black beans is cheap. I call them struggle burgers. I can't wait to be demonized for buying fucking beans. Fuck this timeline.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Newspaper: Americans Eat Too Much Ultra processed food.

Same Newspaper: Look at these little shits splurging on veggies and chicken.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Bitch, it is cheaper to buy the fully cooked rotisserie chicken at the grocery store than the UNCOOKED WHOLE CHICKEN.

Don't fucking tell me how to math, you assholes made corporations people, so I think we have very different ideas of what is important in this world.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sirscooter@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So we are not supposed to ....eat?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The rich don't understand the purpose of food, having never missed a meal in their lives.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ending your sentence after "rich" would have been good enough to answer the question.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If you saved that $5 instead of wasting it on food every day, then in 275 years you could afford the average house!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 210 points 3 days ago (14 children)

splurging on rotisserie chicken

You mean those cheap chickens they sell at grocery stores that can feed you for days?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The wall street journal aren't good journalists.

They cater towards rich people and as such:

  1. Grant a sense of superiority through highlighting financial disparity
  2. Portray news in terms of how they would affect rich people, like tax breaks being good for the economy (the economy being billionaires for wsj)

Nothing they write is objective

[–] ishartdoritos@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

They're not journalists at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 173 points 3 days ago (18 children)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 31 points 2 days ago

Splurging on the cheapest animal protein.. Wowee, really living it up in 2026!

load more comments
view more: next ›