this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
464 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

81611 readers
4346 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta has been granted a patent outlining an AI system capable of simulating a user’s activity on social media to post after their death.

Some fucked up shit.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 140 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Found the appropriate response.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Prime time to remind that Meta probably cranks out five hundred patents every day in case they ever have to engage in patent warfare against competitors. For the simple reason that the competitors are doing the same thing.

The patents cover every little thing under the sun that they can think of, but oddly I don't see each of those patents discussed online.

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That is messed up on an entirely different level.

[–] clav64@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Can people at Meta stop emulating Black Mirror. Please.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be_Right_Back

[–] tino@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

the future is when you can't buy RAM because your dead cousin is using it to spam your feed with their antivaxx ideas.

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 55 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

There are like three episodes of Black Mirror about this.

[–] Novis@lemdro.id 57 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's fucking...... why would a patent office let that be a thing? FUCK

[–] Novis@lemdro.id 58 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

This reminds me of that one judge that let prosecution use an AI approximation of a dead man against someone that killed the dead man to speak in the dead man's voice and I just wanted to throw the justice system INTO THE OCEAN cause wtf. https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/09/tech/ai-courtroom-victim-impact-statement-arizona/

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That is so horribly unethical. Wtf is wrong with people.

[–] Novis@lemdro.id 27 points 3 days ago

What? Come on! It made the judge "feel" something! Not like someone's died or something! /s

[–] mech@feddit.org 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Judge Todd Lang of Maricopa County Superior Court ultimately sentenced Pelkey’s killer Gabriel Paul Horcasitas to 10.5 years for manslaughter — although the state had asked for only 9.5 years — and 12.5 years in total, including an endangerment charge.

“I love that AI. Thank you for that,” Lang said, a recording of the hearing shows.

WTF.

[–] Novis@lemdro.id 24 points 3 days ago

Yeah, ain't it great that judges can be easily swayed by some bullshit? Good country, ethics really well here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 7 points 3 days ago

The job of the patent office is to determine whether that’s a valid patent application or not. As in, can you actually patent that thing, has someone else already patented it etc. As long as it’s technically valid, it gets approved. It’s up to the patent holder to test if its actually useful or not. If they choose to build the thing IRL, it’s up to the courts to determine if that breaks any laws. Every step along the way, the general public is there to judge the moral integrity of said invention, but usually that has no impact on the validity of the patent. Depending on jurisdiction, the patent office may need to follow some moral guielines, but the threshold of rejection is very high. My guess is, you won’t be able to patent a gas chamber for exterminating “illegal immigrants”, but patenting wild Meta BS is technically fine.

See also: this abomination

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago

Didn’t think I’d cross digital necromancy off my bingo card!

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 18 points 3 days ago

Hey guys! We've invented the Dead Person Simulator from that Black Mirror episode "Don't Invent Dead Person Simulators!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

We are going to need a lot of new laws to stop nonsense like this. There is nothing positive to come from faking humans that are dead.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 days ago

They'd probably opt you into it by default without telling anyone...

[–] Apocalypteroid@anarchist.nexus 21 points 3 days ago

Literally a black mirror episode.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Literally dead Internet theory

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Just when you thought it couldn't get shittier. Meta will prove you wrong.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Black mirror had a episode about this years ago. It's crazy no one patented this before.

[–] trougnouf@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Would the black mirror episode not count as prior art and therefore invalidate the patent?

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is dumb and fucked up, but I also look forward to the AI analog for @SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world constantly following up its own posts with apologies and banning itself.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you ban yourself too often you’ll go blind which is why I never have.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

"Dad, I'm over here"

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Let those bot accounts sign up for credit cards, see how fast they get shut down

[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world 20 points 3 days ago

That... Is some fucked up shit.

[–] Crunch@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What a great use of resources. Also, it seems like it borders on identity theft.

[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is exactly that, identity theft.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ah yes, my machine spirit will continue posting against the Trump Regime long after I died while fighting the kakistocracy.

What? That's against the TOS?!

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Great. So now Facebook can become a literal ghost town.

I wonder how advertisers paying for ads on Facebook feel about paying to advertise to dead people?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I don't care how advertisers feel. I've been telling them for decades that their ads have zero effect on me. That it just pisses me off.

When I go into a grocery store, I have a list. If it's not on that list, I'm not buying it. The list was prepared weeks ago, and added as I run out of things. Doesn't matter if you show 100 ads. I'm not paying attention. Even though you paid money to show the ad, I still didn't see it. What difference does it make if I'm alive? Either way I didn't see the....uh.....what were you selling again? It was a commercial for Jesus? See, this just shows how little I pay atttention to ads. I saw the superbowl, and I'm fairly sure one of the commercials was for Jesus. I'm unclear how one would buy Jesus, but that was the ad.

Tell ya what advertiser industry. I'm going to do your job for you. I'm going to make sure every single person pays attention to every ad you ever put out. Are you ready for this? Here we go.

The screen fades in from black to a closeup of some tittys. They're bouncing around, and women are moaning. Then they start moaning "OOOOOHHHH, YEEEAAAAHHHH BUY OUR PRODUCT, BUY THE PRODUCT! OOOOHHHHH!"

Remember, tittys are still bouncing. You put the product in the center of the screen.

You just made a billion dollars!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 13 points 3 days ago

Gotta keep those engagement numbers up.

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

Get grieving relatives hooked on talking to bots, then sell them subscriptions to keep the bots running

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

that's some torment nexus shit

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like I’ll need to include account deletion as a part of my will.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 12 points 3 days ago (7 children)

It's cute how you think deleting your account will stop them.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Imagine how many AI-written patents are being submitted everyday.

And it seems like the patent office just approves whatever comes in these days without even looking at it, they just hope the courts will sort out any conflicts.

Bye bye patent system. Have a cool idea you want to patent? Too bad. It was already patented word for word by some company using AI to churn out patents made up of every conceivable word combination in the English language.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Can't wait for Zuckerberg to start using it.

[–] artwork@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh no no no no no...
Please, God, Gods, or whoever, no...

I absolutely don't want my descendants to talk with some void-empty limited bloody-meatground utter nonsense... I don't want that freaking awful mess of terribly limited data to talk with my children or their children possibly framing and damaging their true memories and genuine confidence in me I had been developing the whole life... I don't want them to remember the algorithm or some imitation of me talking with a machine or some chat bot... no... never... please no... PLEASE NO...
No...
No...
Never...
No...

Some limited inhuman stupid chat/voice/avatar/anything bot? No...
Some bot that may erroneously represent me behind my back?
Never...
Some nonsense that may reshape memories of my ancestors?
No...
Never...
No...

If I am dead, I am dead. I want my descendants to just remember me, talk to me in their memories, real videos, audios, and photos, my effort, my ideas and love in artwork if ever they'll be interested... and once in a while visit the grave, at least 2-3 times per their life, if ever possible... and that's it...

If I am dead, I am dead as my ancestors are, who are not dead for me being alive but in my memories or something more magnificent/supernatural, and how I remember them, where they wanted to be the best they could, respected, glorified, and admired, without disturbing them in memories, soul, and the heart they gifted me, who I will always appreciate, respect, and love...

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I do not want to see Weekend at BernAI’s.

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you still have e a Facebook account, you fully support this.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I fucking wish. If I delete insta, facebook and whatsapp, I cut 99% of friends, my family and my wife. I can probably delete FB and insta, but whatsapp is like impossible to get rid of. Everyone is on it.

Maybe in future EU moves to something else, then deleting would be possible. But as of now, it is not.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›