this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
684 points (94.2% liked)

People Twitter

9604 readers
1314 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And yes, I know people will say block keywords and communities, but people don't understand some communities have rules and people must follow them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 79 points 5 days ago (14 children)

This got reported as being not twitter or equal. I'm kind of on the fence about this. I see their point, but the original was twitter. Please tell me what you think in the comments, not just downvote or upvote. This will guide me in the future if we have any more posts like this.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do whatever, ruleslawyering is not helpful. Is the community enjoying it? It stays. Is it detrimental? It gets removed. The "rules" should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

Is someone posting vaguely in the direction of the intent of the community? That would be good enough for me.

Anyone trying to separate posts into increasingly niche communities (like the asinine dontdeadopeninside and nosafetysmokingfirst split on reddit) is not helping the community of posters and lurkers.

[–] stiffyGlitch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The “rules” should be more like guidelines to suggest to posters what type of content the intent of the community is, not what type of content is permissible.

I totally agree. Rules number 1, 4, and 5 are the most important, in my opinion. I'm not saying that there shouldn't be rules in the communities; there definitely should be rules. Guidelines for what to post instead of what not to post will probably be more beneficial.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago

We need to keep the cycle going. Remove the post, so that OP can make their own fuck this I'm done post.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I don’t tend to think of wpt as specifically twitter posts. Maybe that’s how it started, but over time it has become a more generalized “screenshots of short text posts” type of thing in my mind. The “or similar” in the rules leaves a lot of ambiguity, but in my mind Twitter was always about short text posts, so any short text posts would fall under that “similar” umbrella. I wouldn’t object to seeing something from Facebook, Instagram, or Reddit being posted here as long as it was a text post and not super long, so it feels disingenuous to complain about a Lemmy post being here.

[–] Ashenlux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Especially since, twitter isn't even twitter anymore. And the only thing you are going to get from what twitter has become is ragebait, bots, and racism. For "whitepeopletwitter" to continue and not end up dying from lack of content, it needs to start opening up to other sources that stick with the same idea as what twitter used to supply.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Turret3857 20 points 5 days ago

I havent read the rules of the comm. but ive always perceived whitepeopletwitter as a place to post text based social media screenshots.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago

People like this need to accept and understand that we don't want to talk about US politics everywhere, all the time.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 158 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Ignores the don't X here sign then gets mad when they aren't allowed to X

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

"It's so unfair!" ... as if the identical thing is not being done to literally everyone else all the time. Toddler logic.

A nuance that people often miss about lemmy.ml's authoritarian policies - whereby they ban people from communities they've never even seen before - is not that it is done, but that when it is it cites a hidden set of rules that are nowhere ever written down. Little kid logic, where the rules mean whatever they feel like in that moment, and if you don't like it then feel free to try to stop them.

Some people here are pushing for fascist Reddit 2.0, others for free-speech Voat, but most of us just want to get along somewhere in the middle without too much bother:-P.

[–] Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

My recollection is that Voat took a turn into being fascist Reddit 2.0 pretty quickly itself.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 15 points 5 days ago

Took about two seconds.

[–] Djehngo@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Turns out when you build a platform around anti-censorship you wind up with a small number of free speech enthusiasts and a large number of people who will be banned from any site with rules against hate speech.

Then when you have a site where 80% of the content is racism the 20% non racists leave.

[–] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

Pretty much what happened to 4chan

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 91 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I already block so many keywords and communities here. It's hard to keep up.

Thank you mods for helping keep some places free of US politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 51 points 5 days ago (2 children)

has a very mild run-in with one singular community's admin "That's it, I'm done with the entire platform !"

[–] yogopig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 5 days ago

And a respectful and considerate encounter at that

load more comments (1 replies)

I won't say all rules are valid or right, but this one just makes sense (in contrast to rules of some other communities, which outright ban certain opinions). Sometimes you don't want to hear about all the doom and gloom, and for many people, it's not good for their mental health to hear about it all the time. They know what's happening, they need some time off.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 59 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Daft_ish has got a real problem if they're that outraged by the mod's response. I've seen plenty of powertriping arseholes to be mad at in my time, but this isn't it.

US politics, including about the ICE murders, is spoken about more than enough across the English speaking internet.

I know as much about current US politics as I do my own country's politics, because you can't get away from it without blocking most posts on here.

Which is to say that some of us would just like to have a space to NOT talk or think about politics, including US politics.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Which is to say that some of us would just like to have a space to NOT talk or think about politics, including US politics.

Inb4: "You're just privileged enough not to have to think about it."

No, I just want a brief goddamn respite every once in a while, everybody deserves that. Just because I want to be able to escape into a fantasy world sometimes doesn't mean that I never talk about politics either, it's like cheating on your diet, just let me have a fucking cookie every now and again ffs!

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 days ago

This 100%. I care about politics. I deeply care about what's happening with our country.

But I've had to pare down the places where I see it. I've stopped watching Last Week Tonight because it makes me feel so powerless on what I have control over. I absolutely love the show but I just....can't anymore.

I'm acting locally, participating in whatever protests I can, calling and emailing my reps as often as I can.

But man...the right's "flood the zone" works effectively and I can't just keep burning out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Lemmyshitposts doesn't have a rule against political posts and I fucking hate it. Shitposts are sacred. A shitpost is just silly, irreverent humor. That's it. The moment you bring an agenda into that space it changes into something else.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (5 children)

There was a while there where I was really into wholesome memes. People really don’t get what wholesome is. I started getting legitimately upset at what people thought was appropriate there so I had to block the communities.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Time, place, audience. Daft_ish thinks Lemmy needs a reminder that Alex Pretti was murdered in broad daylight? Imagining them walking up to Greta Thunberg while she's eating a vegan soup for dinner and reminding her about how awful commercial fishing is

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand why have comms literally about politics and world news if you're just going to post the same stuff to any other comm that really doesn't need that kind of content. If people keep ignoring what belongs where, why have comms at all? Idk, maybe it's my OCD talking...

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, so when I go to shitpost and people start taking the posts seriously, I try to say hey folks, look where you are, this isn't a serious community, let's keep the shit light.

And so yeah, when folks shoehorn political agendas into literally any community they can, I'll point out how it's got nothing to do with the community, and how it's frustrating, because it does not further the community, it just furthers that person's (or bot's) agenda.

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 22 points 5 days ago (3 children)

As somebody who just came here from Reddit, I find all of these communities refreshingly free of American politics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] w3ird_sloth@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Yea I'm avoiding american polotics as much as I can as well. Otherwise, it is EVERYTHING I see online.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 4 days ago

Let me guess, European hosted? Yeah I ditched them for their suppression of pro-Luigi speech. Fuck em.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The problem with cute animals now isn’t politics, it’s AI. I don’t want to watch ANY AI animals. Just the thought of being tricked into watching even 1/4 of a vid that ends up being AI, or giving it $$$ via views, has destroyed /awww and all the rest.

I hate this timeline.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›