this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
491 points (99.4% liked)

News

36043 readers
2825 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s renewed criticism of the Chagos deal is reportedly because he is being blocked from using UK bases for a strike on Iran.

Donald Trump has withdrawn his backing for Sir Keir Starmer’s Chagos Islands deal because he has not received UK approval to use its military bases for a US strike on Iran, it has been reported.

The US president attacked the agreement to hand sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius and lease back the Diego Garcia joint UK-US military base as “a big mistake”.

His latest U-turn on his previous support for the deal is because of the UK Government’s refusal to give the White House the green light to use the Diego Garcia base or RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire for a potential military campaign against Iran, according to the Times.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33550336@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Second praiseable move of the UK in the recent days

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] 33550336@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The arrest of former prince Andrew

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Didn't they let him go though?

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I had to look it up because I’m not super familiar or exactly following it, but yes he was. However, he is still under investigation.

I’m just assuming the arrest is what the other thing the commenter was hinting at.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

Released under investigation, they don't just arrest the king's brother on a whim, pretty sure they're pretty sure they can get a conviction.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 26 points 2 days ago

Ah yes, Mr No-Wars warmongering again

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There’s no coalition this time. You’re on your own murca (well you’ve got your boyfriend Israel but they’re a bit tied up massacring children at the moment)

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 60 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Unfair to Israel. They are also massacring women, the unarmed, the injured, the red cross etc etc. They are massacring or killing just about everybody. So please be fair to their efforts and not just limit them to children!!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

How do you know about this? Did they forget to kill a journalist somewhere?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Their snipers activelly target children in Gaza and they activelly supported their boy Epstein with his sex ring using children.

There's clearly a very special relationship between Israel and children.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Not just shooting Children, they often aim for the groin.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Looks like they recently killed a 19 year old American citizen too, but he was brown so they will get away with it

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There’s no coalition this time.

The US is allied with a host of Middle Eastern dictatorships and monarchies

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I can't believe the EU commission took it seriously. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/02/20/eu-ministers-to-grill-commissionss-suica-over-attendance-at-trumps-board-of-peace-launch

It's sanewashing what's clearly an insane initiative.

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

Quite right. The Trump administration are the ones who decided they don't need allies. Fine, then there is no obligation for America's old allies to help America.

Maybe there should be an official alliance between America's old allies: Europe, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, etc. A big free trade area with Americans excluded.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

So are we ready to admit that Israel has our government occupied yet?

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

"America first! We don't need anyone!"

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Trump:

Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime

Can someone please do that to us.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Death to Amerikkka

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Ah yes, potential attack! It's like a repackaging of the WMD argument...
Not that I doubt Iran's crazed potential in the least, but currently the only potential attack comes from the US to cover up domestic sewage...
What will be the first target, "one way or another"-Greenland or Iran?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago

Well, well. The worm turns.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe the Diego Garcia thing will be enough of an excuse to not go to war with Iran on Israel's behalf?

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

There is nothing that would prevent our lawmakers from doing what Israel tells it to, blackmail of them fucking children and whatever else, it finally explains a lot, and Israel isn't really hiding it anymore, they are reveling in taking the mask off.

As soon as they start the forever war, Israel will find endless excuses to go back in, bomb this, assassinate that. Weapons programs, terrorists, whatever excuses they come up with. This will never end, and that's the idea, Israel's governmental leaders want to forestall elections and a reckoning as they've decided that the politicians that failed should stay in power to deal with the fall out from that failure despite not admitting fault and blaming others.

The rest of their governmet, appointed by their politicians, supremely corrupt and unilateral for 25 years when the semblance of a left collapsed, either believes those politicians or pretends to because they think they will benefit. They revel in their absolute military advantage, able to bomb any of their neighbors with near impunity, as they are unable to well respond if at all, and backed by the US that they've compromised so thoroughly they are almost openly showing off being the ones calling the shots ordering the US around. The UK is owned by Israel too, make no mistake, they just have to kowtow to their citizens more in their anti war sentiment more, for now.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

TFW the Brits are like, nah, we don't want to help you overthrow the shah of Iran.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Trump insulted all EU military fairly recently so that's probably a double nah from the former allies...
But hey he has his board of peace now, with all the ...oppressive... countries in it, perhaps they'll send highly trained soldiers to die in Iran.
Somehow I think not.

[–] REDACTED 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This whole thing can go haywire (including many civilian deaths), especially under Trump. It makes sense for UK to tell them to leave UK out of it. Besides, while going after Iran's regime is somewhat popular opinion - US doing it on the other hand suddenly makes it sound much more controversial.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm with you, on all counts. And I think not wanting to touch USA's shit is a legitimate take right about now. Shit, it was the wrong take to back in 2001/2003, and it was the wrong take back in *checks notes* most of US history, but right now for sure. We got our own problems now anyway, many of which were directly caused by the USA, so...

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)