this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
117 points (92.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38148 readers
975 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everybody knows about the backstory, there was a civil war, KMT fled to Taiwan creating two Chinas sort of, maybe, neither recognises the other, whole thing. ROC (Taiwan) ended up transitioning from military rule to a multi-party democracy, while the PRC (mainland China) didn't do that (they did reform economically, "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and all that, but still a one-party state, not a multi-party democracy). The status quo right now is that Taiwan is in the grey area of statehood where they function pretty much independently but aren't properly recognised, and both sides of the strait are feeling pretty tense right now.

Taiwan's stance on the issue is that they would like to remain politically and economically independent of mainland China, retaining their multi-party democracy, political connections to its allies, economic trade connections, etc. Also, a majority of the people in Taiwan do not support reunification with China.

China's stance on the issue is that Taiwan should be reunified with the mainland at all costs, ideally peacefully, but war is not ruled out. They argue that Taiwan was unfairly separated from the mainland by imperial powers in their "century of humiliation". Strategically, taking Taiwan would be beneficial to China as they would have better control of the sea.

Is it even possible for both sides to agree to a peaceful solution? Personally, I can only see two ways this could go about that has the consent of both parties. One, a reformist leader takes power in the mainland and gives up on Taiwan, and the two exist as separate independent nations. Or two, the mainland gets a super-reformist leader that transitions the mainland to a multi-party democracy, and maybe then reunification could be on the table, with Taiwan keeping an autonomous status given the large cultural difference (similar to Hong Kong or Macau's current status). Both options are, unfortunately, very unlikely to occur in the near future.

A third option (?) would be a pseudo-unification, where Taiwan becomes a recognised country, but there can be free movement of people between the mainland and Taiwan, free trade, that sort of stuff (sort of like the EU? Maybe?). Not sure if the PRC would accept that.

What are your thoughts on a peaceful solution to the crisis that both sides could agree on?

edit: Damn there are crazies in both ends of the arguments. I really don't think giving Taiwan nukes would help solve the problem.

I think the current best solution, looking at the more reasonable and realistic comments, seems to be to maintain the status quo, at least until both sides of the strait are able to come into some sort of agreement (which seems to be worlds away right now given their current very opposing stances on the issue)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

You mean West China. It should lay down resistance and be ruled by the actual China. More commonly known as Taiwan.

This was only slightly tongue-in-cheek. It makes just as much sense as what China is claiming.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Any reasoning based on historic belonging is entirely arbitrary. Ignoring an entire people's factual autonomy and right to self-determination, safety, and security is nothing short of oppressive, toxic, and inhumane. Flaunting and threatening power, entitlement, military, and invasion is horrendous and violates international law, advocating for a violent, corrupt world instead of a cooperative multi-national rule of law and stability.

I watched a documentary recently about the history of China, the two opposing factions. It provided some interesting additional context and things I didn't know about previously. I'll refrain from mentioning specifics to keep this comment more focused and concise.

China hides its own atrocieties and history. Both parties were horrendous and sacrificed and murdered their own people. Neither is "the good guy".

The solution is simple: Accept the status quo. That history played out as it did. China MUST accept Taiwan's sovereignty.

Not accepting the status quo has a lot of negative consequences. The solution would be simple. Respect and cooperation instead of oppression, instability, uncertainty, and suffering.

Is that realistic? Doesn't look like it. Possibly with a leadership change. Xi Jinping seemingly already lost some power, and his more aggressive politics have been weakened. Which should not make us think there's no thread anymore.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 124 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (48 children)

China should accept Taiwans sovereignty as a separate Chinese country, and stop being such a little bitch. The end.

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Someone who threatens war to acquire land is not the good guy. Fuck them.

Yes I realize this also references you know who as well.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Given human history, I think it references everyone. That’s not a dig, more acknowledgment that this isn’t actually new.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 31 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Taiwan need to stop claiming they are the legitimate government of China.

China need to recognise that Taiwan isn't part of China anymore.

Neither will happen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 13 points 3 days ago

Realistic? The current status quo of everyone pretending Taiwan isn't a country and China not invading.

China isn't going to accept an independent Taiwan for a variety of reasons. That likely won't change unless there is a war.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Freedom for Taiwan and Hong Kong.

[–] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

And while we're at it, decolonize Polynesia.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (8 children)

A peaceful and realistic solution? Taiwan develops a strategic nuclear deterrent. They're already a near-nuclear country and an industrial and technological powerhouse. A nuclear bomb is fully within their capability, and they already have abundant supplies of all the precursor materials in their possession. The most realistic solution to the Taiwan crisis is that Taiwan obtains nuclear weapons, and China is never able to threaten them with invasion again.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 24 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Taiwan trying to develop nuclear weapons would be the fastest way to get themselves invaded. China would put a stop to it before it they could even say "nuclear deterrent".

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

反攻大陆 (Counterattack the mainland) 😏

/just kidding


I think the only peaceful unification would be if CCP falls and mainland China becomes an actual democracy with free and fair elections, then mainland, HK, Taiwan can form a union, where Taiwan and HK remains autonomous regions for domestic politics (and this automony would be backed by a constitution) and have a common front for defence.

I mean another option would be complete sovereignty but a European Union type of thing where they do cooperate and sort of is like a country, but maintain the option to leave.

But regardless, I think it all comes down to what HKers and Taiwanese want, you need a referrendum for these types of things. I'd say to have legitimacy: Two consecutive referrendums in two separate regularly scheduled election with majority approval before any plan is enacted, to attempt to prevent a Brexit shenanigan.

I'm Chinese American so while I do support democracy, I am kinda leaning towards reunification assuming that there is actually democracy, but again it all comes down to what the people think, the will of the people is more important than my opinions.

[–] nykula@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Since you're Chinese American, I have a question that's doubly offensive but I'm actually interested in hearing your opinion. Should borders the size of China and the U.S. continue to exist at all? IMO one president or central government can't legitimately represent hundreds of millions of people.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So your quesrion is: "Should large countries exist?"

I mean honestly idk...

I hope humanity one day grows past tribalism and we just have one big "European Union" type of thing and worldwide Schengen area and there be no wars.

But unfortunately humans are tribalistic and eventually people are gonna wanna form a bloc, whether it be military alliances like NATO, or confederations like European Union (btw I'm curious what happens if an EU country that isn't in NATO gets invaded... EU is not a millitary alliance so it'd be very weird...) or more commonly, people form countries.

That's just human tribalism.

If mainland China democratizes, then I could see somewhat of a "bloc" being formed between mainland China, HK, Taiwan... as for Tibet and Xinjiang... I have no idea, their culture seems very distinct, I mean they have a whole separate writing system whereas mainland, HK, Taiwan all use the same writing system and have some of the sameholidays (Lunar New Year for example).

Eventually there could be an entire "bloc" in Asia.

Like I really don't like the idea of China being divided into separate provinces without a common military front... and that's not because of ancestry reasons, like for example I do not have any European Ancestry and never been to Europe, but also don't like European Union and NATO getting broken up for the same reasons... it feels weak to get separated... too much chaos, Russia could invade any time. I mean even China literally got threatened by Russia's predecessor, the USSR. (see: "Sino-Soviet Split")

I think forming a "bloc" isn't an inherent issue, I think the key point is avoid centralization of powers... federalism or confederalism would try to slow down ant autocratization attempts, but ultimately, people are people and there's no democracy that will last forever if the people insists on electing wannabe dictators.

one president

Directorial System like in Switzerland, maybe?

Or like EU where there is no one "President of EU"

central government can’t legitimately represent hundreds of millions of people.

Federalism or Confederalism (European Union)

[–] nykula@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Many thanks for such a detailed answer. I agree that blocs and federations are a good thing, and hope to see Asian, South-Eastern Asian, African, and South-American alliances similar to EU form around democratic values. I also hope that they don't turn into rival fortresses with armed borders and migration restrictions between them. As someone from former USSR (Ukraine), I'm quite sure that Russia on its own, without Chinese government assistance, especially technologic, wouldn't at their current economic state be able to wage war and suppress internal movements to democratize and/or truly federalize (in the North, particularly); but I read, admittedly not extensively, about Chinese history and recognize how dangerous it is not to have strong allies when empires are nearby - without strong allies, it's a must to have mostly autarkic production and strength in numbers.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago

While I don't claim to be an expert on the subject, the only peaceful outcome I can see is actually just a continuation of the status quo, where mainland China uses "reunification" messaging as little more than a show of strength and patriotic political rhetoric, and where the Western world continues to treat Taiwan's independence with "strategic ambiguity" while hinting to China that any attempt to take Taiwan will be met with a large scale Western response from the US and allies.

I do think that the West wants Russia's attempted invasion of Ukraine to be a sign of what China should expect if they were to attempt to annex Taiwan. It won't be easy, it'll throw trade and supply chains into absolute chaos, and it'll be met with harsh economic sanctions and large weapons deals at the very least. The West wants China to feel that there is very little upside to attacking Taiwan, and that it's much more reasonable to maintain the status quo (though arguably, tariffs and trade wars needlessly remove some of the US's economic leverage over China).

Rhetoric aside, how much chaos and bloodshed is China really willing to tolerate just for the pyrric victory of finishing what Mao started almost a century ago?

I think the main hope for peace is that Xi and the ruling members of the CCP feel that it's in their personal best interest to talk a big game while doing the bare minimum to disrupt the systems that they currently benefit from.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 20 points 3 days ago (9 children)

China simply waits and maintains its current policy until pro-unification sentiment in Taiwan grows large enough. The balance of power in the Pacific is shifting away from the US and before this century is out they will no longer be able to offer security guarantees.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

All polling indicates that pro-unification sentiment isn't growing though. If China is waiting until they have consent of the Taiwanese, then why would security guarantees from the USA be relevant in the first place?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›