this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
309 points (98.1% liked)

Games

47017 readers
1126 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived article: https://archive.md/HONwC

They'll release one more update (my guess is whatever release-ready content they've already got), then the servers will shut down next Thursday.

"We don't need player counts to be super huge in order to be successful" is starting to ring hollow.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 141 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Hey... At least it lasted longer than Concord. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 88 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I do feel slightly bad for the dev team. A lotta stuff outside their control spun things out of hand; but I also don't think it would have had any success regardless of the whole situation. At least what happened got it some attention and gave it a chance.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 65 points 6 days ago (1 children)

By "dev team", I'm guessing you mean the artists, designers, programmers, and testers; the people who spent the last five or so years actually creating the game. Yes, it sucks for them. Their years of work have effectively been thrown in the trash because of Wildlight's management. I hope they find better work soon, and I hope the management become personae non gratae in the industry.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago (5 children)

If it’s unsustainable for you, release the server and game source code for someone else to host it and patch it. Why waste developers’ time and effort into making of this game?!

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It's insane that this isn't a requirement for shutting down/delisting a game.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That's literally what the "stop killing games" movement was/is pushing for, at least in Europe. Really hope it goes somewhere, but it's kind of stopped making noise lately (at least that I'm hearing), what with the US speed-running fascism more and more every single week.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

SKG (archived on their own YT channel not Ross) did a press conference recently and various politicals were there siding with the movement. It's still slow but ongoing progress.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

That's good to hear.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

As I knew it, it was about releasing binaries/selfhostability not source code.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

I'm convinced it is some sort of insurance fraud a la The Producers. They found a way to make more money by flopping HARD than getting middling success, and flopping hard is a LOT LESS work. If their choice is A) spend a lot of money and time making a really good game that will capture the attention of the entire market; or B) spend a bit of money and time making something that looks convincingly like a real attempt at making a good game to some corpo-fuckwits at an insurance company and then nuke it hours after release... Well. Yea, they'll do the second one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 87 points 6 days ago (4 children)

That's crazy. I guess it's good practice to never pick up live service games because you'll be rolling the dice. I'm glad I pretty much play single player games exclusively.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I genuinely wouldnβ€˜t say so. The game shuts down because nobody played it anyway. The chances you pick up a game no one plays is pretty slim by nature. But even if you have been burned in the past you can just pick up one that is already popular.

Pre-ordering on the other hand is rarely a good idea and that goes for any game, not just live service.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Every live service shuts down because not enough people were playing, eventually. Even ones I loved. I've got multiplayer games from 25 years ago that I can still play, but I can't still play the ones from 10 years ago.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Well they could release the server software before shutting down the service, they wouldn't lose anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dojan@pawb.social 10 points 5 days ago

All live service games will end eventually but a two month run is ridiculous, hahaha.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

That's becoming my takeaway here as well. Don't jump into any live service game early, because it might get rug-pulled right as I'm getting into it.

Of course, if everyone took this approach then no live service game will ever take off, which kinda feels like where we are anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"How could Gamersℒ️ DO THIS????" they'll scream, as their mediocre slopfest crashes and burns. Maybe they should've read the room a bit better before releasing Generic Hero Shooter #846169592.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

They should have learned from Marvel Rivals and used an already well-known IP and all the thighs and tits they can get their hands on. You can't just make a shitty game and expect it to sell, you have to manipulate your players into thinking it's more than just a shitty game

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Marathon next? Place your bets ladies and gentlemen!

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (7 children)

Marathon is probably life or death for Bungie. Sony can't exactly afford to put out a mid game after spending so much on the studio... and "mid" is exactly what Marathon felt like. Just like so many copycats during the battle royale boom.

I don't think it will fail (or if it does, not as hard as Highguard), but unless it manages to stand out from the Tarkov/Arc Raiders/Hunt: Showdown oligopoly, it won't bring in the numbers to please Sony.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 19 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Idk I played the play test and it was easily one of the better extraction shooters. Bungie has gun play locked in. But they shot themselves in the foot with BattlEye linux support and my new linux build is literally being put together this week. So regardless, I won't be buying it when it launches cause it wont run on linux.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Mid is exactly how I have seen Marathon described by the server slam feedback. People vasalating between whether or not they like it immediately after starting to play it is not a great look.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Marathon is the complete opposite of ARC Raiders in the fact that it essentially forces/encourages you to fight. I give it like 2 months before all the casuals go back to ARC because of spawn rushers (they were already doing that during the server slam). And while Delta Force Operations kinda behaves similarly, they do have some ways to reign in the sweats by having multiple maps, multiple difficulties with gear caps, and a ton of other things that prevent bad players from getting farmed 24/7.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago (4 children)

released [...] on January 26, 2026. The studio has announced that the game will be shutting down on March 12, 2026.

What the fuck is happening in "triple-a" game dev world?

[–] leniwcowaty@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The best part - they tried to pretend they're not AAA. They portrayed themselves as small, indie, self-publishing studio, whereas behind curtains the stream of money from Tencent was wide as a river

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It worked for Dave the Diver.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jako302@feddit.org 12 points 5 days ago

These games are build with a budged so high they either have to rival overwatch in its glory days or they get scrapped and written off as a loss since they will never be profitable.

Triple A studios have arrived in the corporate world a while ago were long term profits are irrelevant if your quarterly earnings aren't what the investors want.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Gambling, pretty much. They go all in on a bet that it will explode and make tons of money, take out loans based on that expectation, setting themselves in a position where either it is a major success or it is an utter failure, no in between.

The gaming market is so saturated these days that it's kinda baffling this approach is still being taken. Like I hadn't even heard of this game before this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Solemarc@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

Who could've seen this coming?

Yet another live service game shooting for the moon and not even lasting a month.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Honestly, I think gaming is done with new live service offerings.

Live service used to be a way to get a core-complete, feature-limited games in front of players earlier than if they were fully baked. This was actually good for everyone, as player feedback often guided roadmaps and changes. But now everyone expects every new game to be better than Fortnite, Overwatch, etc. on day one. This just won't ever happen.

Also, the gaming community of today is OBSESSED with popularity numbers (steam concurrents and twitch view count, mostly), and if players don't see that everyone else is playing a game then they won't play either. This is fucking dumb, but we are where we are.

And don't even get me started on gaming news and influencers, who seem like they love to hate. They bitch about being stuck with CoD, then shit on anything that could someday compete with it. It's baffling.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And yet Helldivers 2 comes out in 2024 and sets the world on fire. Seems to me that gaming is perfectly fine with live service as long as it's in line with community expectations and not s soulless cash grab.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago

And don't even get me started on gaming news and influencers, who seem like they love to hate. They bitch about being stuck with CoD, then shit on anything that could someday compete with it. It's baffling.

Nothing gets more "engagement" like that. It's not even isolated to games, any other section of news gets the same treatment. It's a shit show of journalism that we have today.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 16 points 5 days ago

"Why aren't people dumping thousands of hours into our video game while the economy is in the toilet?"

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 days ago

What a waste, make all these people spend years of their lives building a whole videogame and then immediately make it impossible for anyone to ever play it again. A company shouldn't have the right to erase a game from existence, even if it is a bad one.

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 18 points 5 days ago

What's Highguard?

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 days ago
  • adds account level progression and skill trees
  • game shuts down forever in a week

🀦

[–] Wammityblam@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Are games like this grifts?

Build hype, get whatever cash you can, and then shut them down?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago

I don't see how this would be a grift. Tencent's funding seems to have been contingent on some kind of metric, and they pulled out because Highguard fell short.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] tiberius@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 days ago

High risk, high reward. At least 2 million players tried the game and said, "No thanks."

Real indie studios would kill to get those player numbers.

[–] OverfedRaccoon@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I must have been under a rock. This is my fist time hearing about this game. I guess I have a week to check it out and hopefully not like it.

[–] red_tomato@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It’s a PvP hero shooter + siege + looter + capture the flag + demolition all in one game, if that’s your alley.

load more comments (1 replies)

Lightning in a bottle, eh?

[–] Lets_Disco@retrolemmy.com 14 points 6 days ago

The hubris lol... Oh the hubris!

"Who needs beta testing or early access, we made Anthem, this will be brilliant! Who needs a staff, we can run it with the bare minimum."

Feel sad for all the devs who already lost their jobs a few weeks back n now these last few left but fuck that company! Thought they could simply profit off all the work from their staff by sacking them all immediately after release.

Sometimes companies do get exactly what they deserve.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί