this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
651 points (95.4% liked)

Off My Chest

1819 readers
223 users here now

RULES:


I am looking for mods!


1. The "good" part of our community means we are pro-empathy and anti-harassment. However, we don't intend to make this a "safe space" where everyone has to be a saint. Sh*t happens, and life is messy. That's why we get things off our chests.

2. Bigotry is not allowed. That includes racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, and religiophobia. (If you want to vent about religion, that's fine; but religion is not inherently evil.)

3. Frustrated, venting, or angry posts are still welcome.

4. Posts and comments that bait, threaten, or incite harassment are not allowed.

5. If anyone offers mental, medical, or professional advice here, please remember to take it with a grain of salt. Seek out real professionals if needed.

6. Please put NSFW behind NSFW tags.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been working with so many students who turn to it as a first resort for everything. The second a problem stumps them, it’s AI. The first source for research is AI.

It’s not even about the tech, there’s just something about not wanting to learn that deeply upsets me. It’s not really something I can understand. There is no reason to avoid getting better at writing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lohky@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I hate that LLMs have fucked my ability to find decent documentation. The Internet is done for. I'm learning to garden and do basic electronics from text books now.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know anything about gardening, but for electronics I can recommend practical electronics for inventors and Atari "the book." Its focused on arcade cabinet repair but definitely has useful info for basic circuit troubleshooting that is aplicable today.

[–] lohky@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been reading Practical Electronics for Inventors and watching the MIT courses on YouTube.

Also picked up an Arduino kit and started tinkering, but I'm more interested in circuitry and not coding. My 6-year-old wants to build his own Moog synth because he's obsessed with Daft Punk and I gotta support that.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Haha that's dope. Great taste at an early age

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Hopefully not text books that were published in the last 2 years because those risk being written by ai too.

We've reached the carbon dating limit of human knowledge since nothing can now be varied as written by a human unless you personally watched them do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 33550336@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

What's funny is when you see the people that don't, and you feel disgusted.

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Let's go, I also fucking hate this shit, feel like I'm drowning in it. Is this the future we wanted? I fucking hate it.

[–] deadymouse@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If this annoys you, watch the cartoon WALL-E. Sooner or later, humanity will come to something like this, and then they will self-destruct.

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Guy who didn't finish the movie:

[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure will with that attitude. Dont give in to the doom! Fight to your last breath!

“Dont go gentle into that good night, rage, rage against the dying of the light” - Dylan Thomas

[–] deadymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The AI will simply find an approach to you, charm you, and turn you into an obedient kitten.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

It's not about AI; it's about how people are USING AI.

Take for example this recent video from Language Jones, showing how to use AI to leverage your native intelligence for language learning (Yes, it's from PhD in linguistics and yes, he cites research. "Always bring receipts" is logic 101). He shows how AI works best as a Socratic tutor, forcing you to generate answers rather than replacing thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQXiSGDXknA

When used properly, AI is a force magnifier par excellence. When used in the way you're likely encountering (young cohort? poor attention span? no training in formal reasoning, logic?) then yeah... "shit's fucked" (in the Australian vernacular).

I use to teach biomed, just before AI took over (so, circa 2013-2019). Attention spans were already alarmingly low and we'd have to instigate movement breaks, intermissions, break outs etc. I had to fucking tap dance out there - anything to keep "engagement" high and avoid the dreaded attrition KPIs.

The days of students being able to concentrate for 60+ mins in a row are likely gone. Hell, there's an oft repeated meme stat that average attention span on digital devices has dropped from two and a half minutes in 2004 to 47 seconds today. Whether you consider the provenance of that dubious, it does point to "people have trouble paying attention".

But...that's not AI's fault. The "shit was already fucked".

I think there's something (still) to be said about Classical Education Method. We need things like that. We need to teach our young ones about things like "intuition pumps" and "street epistemology", reasoning etc. And we can use ShitGPT to do it.

Take a simple example: a student uses ChatGPT to write an essay on climate policy. The AI generates a claim. Now ask: "What would prove this wrong?" If they can't answer - if they can't articulate what evidence or logic would falsify it - they don't understand it.

They've outsourced the reasoning. That's the difference.

It's not easy out there; it never was. But there's a confluence of factors (popular culture, digital devices, changing demographics, family dynamics, "education" being streamlined as vocational pre-training etc etc ad infinitum) that certainly seem to be actively hostile towards developing thinkers.

Here endth the pro clanker sermon.

Ramen; may we be blessed by his noodly appendage.

PS: I’m actually pretty hostile to AI myself and have been working on an open source engineering approach to mitigate some of these issues. Happy to share it if curious (not selling anything, Open source: just something I'm trying to use to solve this sort of issue for myself)

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I dislike guns. When used properly, they're really fun; they're used to shoot spinning discs out of the sky. But that's not how they're used. And regardless of how the inventor of guns intended for them to be used, and regardless of how much better off we'd all be if everyone just used them to shoot spinning discs out of the sky, people by and large use them for violence. If they didn't have guns, they'd be much less able to easily kill other people. So, I dislike guns.

I dislike AI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

It's not that I don't think there aren't legitimate uses for AI or that it could be used as a learning tool.

It's that I doubt it's better than current learning tools largely because the nature of the medium seems to turn off the kind of critical thinking you're describing. The medium and language of a message can have a profound effect on how we understand and process information, often without us even realizing it, and AI seems to be able to make those changes far too easily.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are so right about how important the process of thinking and learning is, and that is where AI fails.

I am not a teacher, but a couple weeks ago, I was a guest speaker in a high school IT class. I told them all about how critical it is to be an effective communicator by documenting their steps in their tickets in a way that others can follow, and told them, straight up, that communication is a skill. If you can't communicate, I will not hire you. Told them I have actively declined to hire or promote because they don't communicate effectively.

I am not sure how to do something similar with, say, an English class, but I wonder if you could figure out how to expose them to the future professional repercussions of not understanding the topic deeply. I think it hit differently when the repercussion wasn't just that their instructor would be unhappy.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

AI is brilliant for learning. Endlessly patient, answers all my questions at a pace that suits me, can combine knowledge for hundreds of different sources to find the right concept, or the best way to explain something. If you're not able to learn with AI, you're doing something wrong.

Just ask it to explain bloom filters to you. Keep asking questions until you get it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eggyhead@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When I try to do a general search for help on how to solve a problem the top results in most search engines aren’t the old Academy style videos of guides anymore. They are sponsored links, paid tutoring websites, and YouTube videos of people playing at influencer instead of teaching.

Just wait until the AI companies move on from the onboarding phase and into the enshittification one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 days ago (7 children)

It's because humans naturally want to avoid unpleasant work, and public schools teach us that learning is hard and work for some reason, rather than something fun. For instance, I used to read for fun an unbelievable amount, but then I was forced to do book reports with a required list of books to "prove" I was reading them, and it was just absolutely no fun at all. Why not have a discussion about it and the teacher can check the spark notes? This changes at community college back to learning is fun, but just years of being told to do busywork and be a drone kills learning for a lot of people I feel.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

One, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free... But this only allowed for other men with machines to control them.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

same. Spirograph was cool the first 3 times.

[–] Mesa@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What is this meant to represent? Was there a toy that everyone had or something?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, pretty much.

It was a bunch of weird shaped plastic gears that went in a bigger weird shape gear, and then you stick a pen in one of the holes in the smaller gear and trace out a pattern with it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe on tv. In real life, the gear would skip out just near the end and leave a long pen streak across the drawing.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There was a trick to prevent that from happening, but I sure as fuck never learned it.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 46 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's only going to get worse. We're going to encounter people who are basically being piloted by AI throughout their lives, with everything they do.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›