this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
609 points (99.7% liked)

World News

54755 readers
2851 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

UK and Japan among countries that are considering options but yet to commit warships to blockaded shipping route

Countries including the UK, Japan, China and South Korea have said they are still considering their options but without making commitments after the US president, Donald Trump, urged them to send warships to the strait of Hormuz to secure the vital shipping route.

The effective closure of the strait of Hormuz by Tehran, in retaliation for airstrikes by the US and Israel, has proved catastrophic for global energy and trade flows, causing the largest oil supply disruption in history and soaring global oil prices.

However, the international response to Trump’s call for the dispatch of warships has so far proved vague and reluctant, with countries unwilling to commit to a military response that could prove treacherous for their navies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mghackerlady@leminal.space 8 points 59 minutes ago

Japan isn't considering it. "We'll think of it" is japanese for "No, but saying no directly is rude"

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 1 hour ago

What allies? Like really who is left?

[–] joan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Lol what a child

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"CLEAN my MESS! CLEAN my MESS!"

[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Made from real gorilla chest!

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

And this sweater, it's no better, made from real Irish Setter!

[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 21 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

So we’re out of nato but we expect nato to help? Eat a brick trump

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago

And you already won the war.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Nato AND China

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago

Not completely muted. Spain and italy made it very clear how they felt.

[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 30 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The US has the largest military navy in the world, by far. They can very well choose to "escort ships" on their own, if they're ready to accept the risks that comes with it.

The US is essentially looking for a sucker to stick his neck out for them. The British would be smart to keep out of this one, but again, they're British.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 11 minutes ago

The British said they will look into it. That means no in British.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 30 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

American here.

Our asshole government started this fucking war and is fully responsible for the consequences. Other countries should embargo us until we agree to pay reparations to cover the economic damage caused by the war. Or better yet - seize any assets of American oligarchs to cover damages.

It sounds like I'm ignoring the human cost of the war, and that's because the human cost isn't a concern for those behind Trump. The billionaire class running this country doesn't care about how many innocent people suffer, so they need to be attacked economically.

[–] faux@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 hours ago

I like the idea of them seizing the assets of the oligarchs, but I'm sure they'd come up with a way to make the 99% pay for it like they did after 08 and like they already are with the private credit collapse.

[–] GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

Oh wait until Trump is out of office, there will be an aftermatch.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 38 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Were we not in a trade war with everyone all year? Why would they help us? Should have got the details worked out before starting shit if you were going to need help you stupid orange fuck.

[–] Man_kind@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Technically the straight is vital for all countries. So Trump went and fucked the world with his war mongering. And countries may be wishing to workout a deal that if they help him, they get something if he is successful, but imo, that would be a mistake, since his agreements aren't worth shit.

So, to me, the only solution is to wait and see and leave trump on his own.

He will definitely use that later on and accuse of not helping etc... but thats fine. If countries do help, it wont score them with brownie points, because trump always wants more, so if he can back out of a deal, and you dont have much leverage to force him not to, he will just TACO right out of it.

I'd sooner help Iran secure the straight, and china, and bring the entire american economy to its knees, before I helped it win its war.

And if I ever DID consider sending ships, I'd ask for 20 billion$ up front, and once the check clears, i will send my ships.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, agreed, this sucks for everyone but if they help it will only enable him further and he'll have forgotten about it when he starts up on whatever the next distraction is. They'd be better off making a deal with Iran.

[–] Man_kind@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

Ya, unfortunately Iran, Russia, China, these countries all suck as well. But Israel/US are a much more immediate threat. Unless you're Ukraine, as russia is obviously the more immediate threat, and you dont want to help Iran for that reason, since they are team russia, but I agree Trump should not be enabled. Let him waste his resources and Iran's and russia in a fight together, and we will pay the cost of inflation for it. It's not a bad deal.

[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago

Calling us is lovely, but what exactly would you like us to do?

We warned you that they would close the strait and that the world would be powerless. Now you went and did it anyway.

So.. Exactly WHAT would you like us to do?

There are mines in that narrow gap now. We need to clear them while Iran is taking potshots at us. Clearing mines takes weeks. Even when NOT being shot at.

No Trump. You break it, you own it.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

Iran has already offered all countries the out of kicking out the US and Israel embassadors so that their ships are allowed to pass the Straight.

Further, my impression is that at least in Europe and especially after the Greenland affair, most of the public opinion thinks Trump is an untrustworthy liar AND because they attacked Iran unprovoked, America and Israel are the ones to blame for the increase in fuel and gas prices they're already feeling.

(There's enough independent press in most of Europe that the "blame Iran" messaging is far from dominant)

The idea of sending European ships into Trump's war is incredibly unpopular and whilst I don't think we're quite yet at the stage were kicking out the American embassador would be popular, the more fuel and gas prices go up the more acceptable it looks.

Then the whole Epstein files thing throws suspicion in people's minds on any European politician that's a little too eager to do what America or Israel wants.

At the very least the offer from Iran introduces doubt and confusion making it far harder for blackmailed European politicians to find a way to justify the incredibly unpopular idea of putting European ships and military at risk because of a war of pure aggression started by America and Israel.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Is that offer still open to friendly nations? As I understand it, they have been mining the strait, and things just seem a bit chaotic to mine it in a way that leaves a safe and known path, plus how to communicate that path to those they want to let through while denying those they don't. Unless the minea are remote instead of proximity, but I think part of the point was to make the embargo passive so that carpet bombing the area wouldn't be an effective counter.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago

Maybe FIFA can step in with the 'straight out of Hormuz' award. Also does anyone seriously think that China will assist the US after the way they have been and still are being treated?

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure Trump and Netanyahu expects to have regime change in Iran just like that and now they are wondering why it wasn’t going well. It seems like Iran’s strong resistance came to the surprise to them. This is totally the most stupid of all wars, not a single plan what to do or how to do it.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

They might have thought they could hold the world economy hostage to force other counties to act. Or the whole wanting things to get better is an act and the economic disruption is the whole point.

[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The world should say "Drop the tariffs and we will talk"

Then say "No".

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure the American people have learned their lesson yet. I say let the Tariffs continue until they realize they should never elect another Republican again. I say that as an American paying for the tariffs. The answer should just be "No."

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The average American reads and comprehends at a sixth grade level. Learning is not the America strong suit here.

[–] angband@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Wrong, that's way too high of a grade level.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

I’m a tyrant, why won’t anyone play with me.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 23 points 11 hours ago

So far, the US has not sent its own navy ships to escort tankers through the strait.

Then why would other countries send ships to help in a war that the United States of Israel started without consulting them??? Trump, again, shitting himself and expecting others to clean him.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago

He'd get more help if he resigned.

[–] AmazingSUPERG@thelemmy.club 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This looks like a job for the Board of Peace!

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

You mean… send THEM to clear all the mines?

[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 33 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

After mistreating all of his allies, after humiliating Ukrainians in the Oval Office, and after saying he already won this thing multiple times, he keeps requesting others to take risks for him.

Other countries should wait for his navy to get there first before risking their ships and people.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 10 hours ago

Remember the Greenland thing?

Europe remembers!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

The strategy has been to turn allies against us in every way possible. Gee I wonder why they're not clamoring to risk life and limb for trump now. And lol, his first instinct is to threaten them to get their help.

He simply cannot fathom how to handle a situation where he doesn't hold all the cards. He was born rich and through his entire life he's only had any success because of combining that unearned wealth with psychopathy. He holds no cards right now.

load more comments
view more: next ›