this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
273 points (94.5% liked)

Games

47189 readers
1131 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jyk0L8eLs7jd7es.png

I'm completely speechless. This looks so terrible I thought it was a joke, but apparently Nvidia released these demos to impress people. DLSS 5 runs the entire game through an AI filter, making every character look like it's running through an ultra realistic beauty filter.

The photo above is used as the promo image for the official blog post by the way. It completely ignores artistic intent and makes Grace's face look "sexier" because apparently that's what realism looks like now.

I wouldn't be so baffled if this was some experimental setting they were testing, but they're advertising this as the next gen DLSS. As in, this is their image of what the future of gaming should be. A massive F U to every artist in the industry. Well done, Nvidia.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 hour ago

This looks so bad, like uncanny 3d porn bad.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 16 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

the inability to read the room, lol. and I thought I was autistic

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 hour ago

We can't play games unless we play exactly as the developers intended (constant bug fixes, online requirement, anticheat etc. for non competitive games), but Nvidia can ensure games are portrayed differently, entirely shoving a middle finger in artists' faces? And you raise a valid point --

AI is trained on what, exactly, because AI filters always enhance facial definition, add makeup like shadow, blush and lipstick, and full body upscaling adds flat stomachs with abs, perfectly symmetrical D cup breasts, in this case blonde highlights are apparently more appealing than the original.. It all stinks of the generic 2010's Western white heterosexual man's idea of the perfect woman's body. It's like every beauty filter is made by Jack Black's character from Shallow Hal.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 5 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

Reading through the comments, this is definitely an unpopular opinion, but while I don't love it, it does look more "realistic" to me, even if it should look more like the source material.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

Exactly. This is one of the few good uses for AI. It looks less like a beauty filter and more like a realism one. If it can make the rest of the game look as real, I'm all for this. I just hope it doesn't require a GPU upgrade, because I was lucky enough to score a 4090 at launch and I plan on keeping it for at least another 6-8 years.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Don't call it DLSS!

Call it AISSS (AI Slop Supersampling)!

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago

AiSS: Arbitrarily Interfering Super Slop

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

I bet you're all being used to manipulate stock prices.

[–] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

"This does not just apply to high end graphics. We're already seeing that a little bit with Starfield, which is a more primitive title" lmaoooo

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Bethesda should be offended that their flagship product that runs on their archaic engine was just roasted like this

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 37 minutes ago

Todd is too busy swimming in his vault Scrooge McDuck style.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 hour ago

Close one, I almost just downloaded a mod instead of burning money.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 1 points 34 minutes ago

I don't want to hate on it, but at the same time why is everything AI just hyper-realistic uncanny valley perfectionism BS?

I know people harp on AI for stealing art, but honestly whose art are they stealing? Because its really bad. If we're going to live in a dystopia can they at least steal art of people who are good at it.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

It’s bad now, it’s gonna get worse soon… I do feel that modern video games have plateaued in recent years, with the addition of this I do believe that we are staring down the barrel of a Grand Canyon sized crash.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 182 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (13 children)

Check out this fun little nugget from further down in the article:

Nvidia actually used two RTX 5090s for its demos: one plays the game, the other exclusively runs the DLSS 5 technology.

An entire second GPU just to run it.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 45 seconds ago

SLI is back!

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 hours ago

That's actually good news in my eyes, we definitely won't see this hit the consumer market for years.

[–] Fabrik872@lemmy.world 108 points 3 hours ago

I think you have a typo there: An entire second GPU just to ruin it.

[–] Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Context is important. The following sentence is:

The use of two GPUs is required right now as DLSS 5 still has a long way to go in terms of optimisation - both in terms of performance and its VRAM footprint. However, DLSS 5 is designed for use on a single GPU and that's how it will ship later this year. Quite how scalable it is also remains to be seen, but in common with other DLSS technologies, Nvidia tells us that the computational cost scales with resolution.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago

Sure just double the vram and your AI can run, unfortunately you can't afford that vram because billionaires are running AI.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Can hardly afford or find one, they expect us to buy two? Fuck them

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They have no intention to sell them to us. They'll maybe let us play it like this thorugh GeForce Now, or any other streaming service.

They don't want regular folk to buy PCs anymore.

So, yes. Fuck them indeed.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

No. They want regular folk to buy PCs. They just have no idea what regular folk can afford. How much could a banana cost, 10 dollars?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 32 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Can't believe DF is so positive about this, just looks horrible. I've actually been quite positive about technologies like DLSS and FSR but this... no thanks.

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

The amount of glazing they do, holy fuck. They had me too for a minute before I started wondering if this is just an april fools joke

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago

Crazy to me to see people just now waking up to just how underinformed Digital Foundry really is to technical details, and how much they sold out.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 24 points 3 hours ago

I just watched the Digital Foundry video on this and the way they fuckin glaze over this tech just disgusted me enough to unsubscribe.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Lighting in video games encompasses a lot of things these days. I'm not a graphic designer but, to my untrained eye, it looks like this tech is pushing hard on things like subsurface scattering to make materials appear more realistic. It doesn't appear to be changing the actual polygons. This picture further down seems like a more realistic example of what it would end up looking like when the technology is complete. I think they picked that particular first image as an example BECAUSE it's such a stark change.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Ok but the included picture added eyeliner and a red lip stain.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 3 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

Zoom in on the before; the textures are fairly low res so it's hard to see at a distance but she clearly has eyeliner along her top eyelid. I can't really tell if the intent was for the dark undereyes to be eyeshadow or bags from being exhausted. But you can tell the AI is pulling from source coloration, not just adding things willy nilly like a beauty filter. The lip coloration, idk, that could be an artifact of the early technology or a hallucination. But to me it appears that she had some sort of lipstick on because it doesnt extend all the way to the corners of her mouth. I don't think contouring is the right word but maybe someone here who wears makeup could add some detail?

edit actually looking even more closely, i can't tell if that's eyeliner or just her eyelashes being dense. Either way you can see what the model is trying to replicate. I don't think it looks good but it isnt doing a "beauty filter". If the model is adding eyeliner, it appears to be confused based on the thick black line in the source image. Again, these are really low textures compared to what it's trying to output so hopefully this improves over time like every other DLSS tech has.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Makes perfect sense in context.

Nvidia is no longer a gaming company. They do not care about gamers. They are actively DRIVING AWAY gamers as fast as they can, because AI chips are more lucrative than dirty smelly tiny consumer products.

This is meant to show off real-time AI generation performance, which is massively marketable to AI companies. Not consumers. Nothing is about consumers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eli@lemmy.world 37 points 3 hours ago

Idk why, but this reminded me of the South Park episode where everyone is using photoshop to show off their girlfriends.

Had to make the meme

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Insanely impressive that it’s able to do that in real time.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 8 points 2 hours ago

DLSS 5: For when 85% fake frames and 75% fake pixels just isn't enough!

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 40 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't DLSS by defintion always an AI slop filter?

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 40 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Not really, DLSS mostly just reduces the resolution of a game and then upscales it back up. It does a pretty good job of making the game still look (almost) exactly the same. This, however, completely changes what you're looking at.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 32 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

DLSS is short for Deep Learning Super Sampling, it does the upscaling using deep learning, what people also call AI. The upscaler has to be trained on images. Depending on how you train it you either get something that looks almost exactly the same as the game at a higher resolution or you get AI slop.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 33 points 4 hours ago (8 children)

I'm aware of how it works, but the results aren't bad. Worst case scenario is you get some ghosting with DLSS, but it's far from what I'd call AI slop.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 15 points 3 hours ago

Yeah no at this point nuke the whole fucking company.

load more comments
view more: next ›