this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
837 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

73066 readers
2438 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 173 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's a shame how obvious they're working their corporate bullying cards simply because of money. Imagine if I created a product called Google and tried to sue Google for it. That would be ridiculous, right? Well, that's what Facebook is doing, just with money.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It's not what Facebook is doing. The company has owned the trademark for over a decade, and Facebook is trying to strong arm them into giving it up.

This is also in the UK where they somewhat stand up to companies like Facebook. McDonald's lost their trademark for the Big Mac for trying to do this exact same thing.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Maybe I didn't convey what I'm saying well. Facebook is attempting to take a name because they have money. Laws don't really apply to them, they seem to think, and it's because of their bullying and their money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 4 points 2 years ago

Someone should start an alternate DNS root and then auction off facebook.com within their platform.

[–] Jivebunny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also, Wendy's had this issue as well in Europe, but their issue was about their actual company name.

[–] Candybar121@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

hahaha i didnt know this happened. Supermac FTW!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Facebook isn’t suing Threads. The longtime trademark holder is suing Facebook.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Okay, pointing out the analogy of "Imagine if I created a product called Google and tried to sue Google for it [...] Well, that’s what Facebook is doing" doesn't match this situation.

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Facebook created a product called Threads and is attempting to bully Threads Software into taking their name. I was creating a hypothetical situation about how most small companies can't just steal a company trademark, because it's rightfully someone else's. However, if you are a larger company and, have enough money, and have shit ethics, then you can just kinda... ignore that, and for some reason, the US is happy to let wallets write the law.

They did this with Meta, too.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree, that is what they're doing. My only point was they're being sued, not suing someone. They just took the name and were ignoring the other company that was already using it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pastel_de_airfryer@lemmy.eco.br 69 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Didn't they pull the same shit back when they changed the company name to Meta?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 64 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Fuck I wish my old elementary school friends and parents wouldn't use Messenger. I'm eternslly stuck on that platform.

[–] camr_on@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Does Whatsapp connect to messenger like Instagram does? Not sure it's any better though, since it's still owned by Meta. I wish I could get everyone on signal

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] random65837@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Nope, you're not. That's a choice. I have no shortage of people using privacy invading messengers, crazy thing, when I send them a SMS/MMS... they get it, like everybody does.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 56 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I predict that years will go by and it'll still be called Threads.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just like Meta is a stolen name. Facebook doesn’t care.

[–] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

That's why the UK company is using a cease-and-desist approach, which apparently is an option in the UK.

[–] LemmyZed@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Absolutely zero care. Too much money gushing in.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 40 points 2 years ago (17 children)

Well, since Meta/Facebook will probably be pulling out of the UK along with every other social media company, that’s hardly a “threat”

[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You mean, "That's hardly a 'thread?'"

I'll see myself out

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You mean, “hold this thread as I walk away” 🎶

[–] Amastan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Threadful this story. Poor wee nerds. Fight them Meta’s

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Do you want to destroy my sweater?!?

[–] FrostbyteIX@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ba-dum-tssss!

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] zerkrazus@kbin.social 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if FB/Meta tried to just settle out of court and pay them off.

[–] mPony@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago

"That'll be one billion quid, please."

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They will. This was most likely planned by their legal team in advance, will cost Facebook a negligible amount compared to their revenue and marked as a “risk.” And when they settle it will be a planned business expense, like a fine

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What would it have cost Facebook to come up with a different name?

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

~$1,000,000,000,000 USD, which is why they're trying to do it the "easy way"

[–] SeabassDan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The legal fees alone while it gets dragged out in court will definitely hurt the smaller company.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's the strategy, of course. Throw a ton of lawyers at it and hope the other company just gives up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Threads isn't even a good name lol

[–] woshang@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Never download the Meta Threads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

ITT:...
...wait why did I just get kicked off facebook.

load more comments
view more: next ›