Plenty of Pedo Protectors and Pedos in the red run Idaho oblast.
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
614 points (99.4% liked)
politics
28960 readers
1914 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Only pedophiles would think about children's dicks as much as Republicans do.
A felony? LOL
I wonder if they are smart enough to put exceptions in for children where the father or mother may possibly take the child into the 'wrong' bathroom.
Wait til some MAGA Dad gets arrested for this
Right wingers are all such goddamn freaks I swear.
And snowflakes
Is this a girl toilet or a guy toilet?
is it a Toto or American Standard?
Toto drake 2 for the win!
That's actually a really easy answer.
It's female.
les toilettes - in french.
It's male in Spanish lol. Does that make toilets non-binary?
el baño / el inodoro
Maybe we need to go by where it was manufactured, and maybe they should come with labels etched into the porcelain so they don't get mis-gendered and placed incorrectly?
We could issue certificates at the time they're manufactured
I dunno, if we do that it might cause some black market certificate situation with people trying to unlawfully place male toilets in the female bathrooms.
How boring and stupid do you need to be to make this your legislative priority?
Its not boring and stupid, it's hateful and bigoted
I mean Republicans can't govern. So if they weren't persecuting a minority to appease their bigot base, what would they be doing?
Do they include a definition of “biological sex”? And of how that’s going to be determined?
Of course not. They have no fucking clue what they’re talking about. They just want to hurt people
The people making this law have no idea that there are people who are biologically intersex and, if told, will dismiss it as irrelevant because they're "a tiny minority". Deaf people are also a small minority and it's common practice to accommodate them. All people should be considered when making a law with the threat of jail time.
What about intersex people... can they go in both?
If it comes up in court, I guess they'll be forced to specify if they're defining biological sex by chromosomes, genitalia, or some other biological feature. Unfortunately, the law was made by people who are completely oblivious to the complexity of biological sex. This is why people shouldn't be allowed to make laws without knowing the science if these things. Same thing with anti-abortion laws being made by people who don't understand biology
The cruelty is and has always ever been the point.
Oooh! Oooh! I remember this one!
Next, businesses will have to create a separate restroom that says "TRANS ONLY" so things can be "separate but equal"...
ಠ_ಠ
I would be weirdly fine with a trans bathroom as long as cis people genuinely can't enter it... We would keep that shit immaculate and safe. Tiny little safe space with sinks and mirrors and toiletries and supportive allies anywhere you go.
Except now you have a situation where armed individuals who masturbate to the 2nd amendment will wait idly by the TRANS ONLY bathroom for someone to walk out of it, murder the person who walked out of it, and say they feared for their lives because they tried to "groom them".
At least in that situation the Trans person/people could reasonably expect the business/establishment to be an ally. That's assuming there is no law that says there has to be a Trans only bathroom, any place which installs one would probably only be doing that because they're an ally or Trans themselves. Now what your describing happening to businesses/establishments which are supportive of Trans people I can totally see happening.
I mean, yes, obviously, I am all too aware of the larger safety issues and societal issues of "separate but equal"
load more comments
(3 replies)
It’ll be interesting to see how this aligns with the Full Faith and Credit clause for someone who updates their birth certificate from another state that allows for that then uses the bathroom that aligns with said certificate.
Only if the bill mentions birth certificate as the source for one's "biological sex" and not something about genotype or phenotype at birth (both of which have different issues).
I guess the right response to this is to get the absolute manliest-looking trans men to Idaho to use the public ladies' room in places frequented by lots of the most fragile GOP-types. Monkey's paw that shitstain of a bill.
Only if the bill mentions birth certificate as the source for one’s “biological sex” and not something about genotype or phenotype at birth (both of which have different issues).
Right, and what is the documentation that legally expresses that? A birth certificate. Seems really easy to say "I went to the bathroom that aligns with my birth certificate with the good faith intent to follow the law." People can't see their genotype or phenotype with their eyeballs, so relying on that document seems the best a lay person can do. Seems a good faith to follow the birth certificate, whatever it may be modified to.
All of that is fair, except for one thing: you absolutely can see phenotype. It being observable characteristics is literally part of the definition. The pheno- prefix has a Greek root meaning to show or display, same origin as in phenomenon. A phenotype is thus categorizing something based on how it appears.
Man, I did not know Idaho was so dominated by lunatics.
northern idaho is nazi paradise. southern idaho is mormons. boise has some sanity but it's a lone island
As a Canadian, I could have guessed... There's a sort of obvious pattern that's emerged over the last couple of decades involving the less populated areas being the most deathly afraid of the world at large, thanks in large part to the sample biases incepted through social media.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›