this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
526 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

82989 readers
2696 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (10 children)

Can someone please come out with a phone that's an actual computer and help stop this nonsense?

Phones cost a lot of money at this point and I'm completely sick of them being some locked down, surveillance ridden pile of crap. A reasonably built one would be able to replace a laptop at this point if it weren't for these artificial constraints imposed by the stupid fucking suits running things.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Valve should make a Linux phone. Smaller Steam Deck with a modem

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago

furilabs flx1s. I'm using one

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

""""sideloading"""", oh look who cant say installing software

[–] techt@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

"Sideloading" is the "jaywalking" of the mobile space

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 363 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Making users wait 24 hours doesn't improve security; it's an anti-competitive change designed to make the Google Play store seem like less of a hassle in comparison.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 95 points 4 days ago (8 children)

I can actually see where it can improve security against scammers trying to scam elderly and non-tech savvy people.

  • Scammer tries to get someone to install malware from their site
  • Victim isn't familiar with sideloading, but scammer instructs them
  • Victim hits the first time 24 hour block and has to restart and wait
  • The restart alone breaks contact with the scammer, scam thwarted

For the rest of us that know our way around Android, it's just a one time annoyance, after completing all the steps to enable sideloading, you won't have to wait 24 hours anymore.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 69 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It’s going to be effective, but it’s a sad world where you have to create a total nanny state because there exist a subset of users who are INCREDIBLY stupid.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Is it still a subset when it's the majority?

And to be honest, the level of effort scammers are willing to go through is shocking, and AI's just making it easier for them.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Anything less than the whole is a subset, yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 51 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'd believe that if most Pig Butchering scams weren't using apps from Google Play already.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Lets be real though, currently they already have to blow through 4 other warnings about installing unsigned APK and enabled the browser or file manager to be able to install applications. It's almost certain if they are that far deep/commited, they are going to call the scammer back if the scammer left a number.

Yes this might allow for a time delay where the scammers number could be disabled if reported by enough people, or someone else to be like "yo this is a scam" if they mentioned it but, I don't think this is as secure as they are saying it will be. The target audience for this is very unlikely to be thwarted by a time delay. Plus, the scammer will make some excuse about how the warning is just a safety percaucion and doesn't need to be followed as this is a normal usage of the toggle, and then have them call back after the delay is done.

For clarification: the target audience doesn't know about the scam, and all they care about is that someone is seemingly willing to assist with an issue or problem they have. Said person knows the solution and they just have to wait for the timer to be done to be able to do said solution. They have no reason of telling others about it (unless they were complaining about googles time delay) as they already got someone who is seemingly able to assist.

Honestly, having to have the user type "I agree that I have verified the application i am trying to install is genuine and not a fraudulent app" or a listbox of checkmarks to toggle in order to enable it would be far more efficient for this case.

Hell take the example image the article on the dev page has and make it into toggles instead and it would work far better than a timer does.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] zzffyfajzkzhnsweqm@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Scammers almost always install remote desktop app from play store. This is just anti competitiveness....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xcjs@programming.dev 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I do not consider a win, and I will continue applying pressure where I can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 70 points 3 days ago (6 children)

It’s not side loading. It’s installing software on the device you probably paid multiple thousands for that you no longer own.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] entwine@programming.dev 38 points 3 days ago

If antitrust was being enforced, Google execs wouldn't even dream of attempting this bullshit.

Antitrust regulation is probably the easiest way to fix the biggest problems in our society, it is 100% bipartisan, and it is easy to explain to the average US voter. The only group that is against it is the billionaires/ultra wealthy. Instead, politicians are all hyperfocused on culture war mudslinging and bullshit that makes no difference.

Break up Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta (just to start), and watch how the tech industry explodes with innovation again, and the tech billionaire becomes an endangered species. The AI bubble will burst as companies actually need to compete to survive, and thus won't be burning as much resources on crap that clearly doesn't work.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 176 points 4 days ago

No we didn't win. This is Google making it harder to install the programs you want, rather than the programs Google wants you to have.

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I, as the owner of my device, don't want to wait 24h.

I hope this will popularize the ROM community again. It gradually faded out due to mainstream ROMs having every perk of the custom ROMs but now the custom ROMs can start offering freedom, which no official ROM will offer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 50 points 3 days ago (9 children)

To call the install of apps of your choice as «sideloading», means that they have won.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 53 points 3 days ago

I'm writing an app that I will distribute only through f-droid. The people I would like to share it with are typical, non-technical android users. Before those changes I could just send them a link to f-droid apk and explain it's just another app store or send a link to the apk directly and probably most of them would be able to install it. Now I would have to tell them to do all those weird things first, things that look suspicious and that they would not understand the purpose of. I don't think anyone will be wiling to do it. This is not a win. The effect will be exactly the same - serious limits on distributing apps though alternative channels.

[–] morto@piefed.social 130 points 4 days ago (14 children)

So, we will have to enable developer mode for that? How long before banking and government apps refuse to run if you have "sideloaded" apps installed? This will be the same as not allowing the majority of people to sideload. No win in here, just an advanced strategy from google to make us conform

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 42 points 4 days ago (4 children)

This is already the case if the developer mode toggle is enabled for some. I have to turn it off any time I'm traveling for work because the app we have to use to file expense reports refuses to run with developer mode enabled.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 43 points 4 days ago (6 children)

At that point you should tell your work to get a work only device for you... I always refuse to use my phone for work shit. I used to explain to them why, now I just lie and say my device is too old to have anything installed on it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 92 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Microsoft appeared to walk back Recall until they suddenly brought it back unannounced and doubled down. So I'll believe it when I see it

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 15 points 3 days ago

Yeah corpos don't respect consumers or norms of human dignity, they'll just do what they want more quietly if you complain. The only real solution is to break up monopolies (ideally for the last several decades).

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It is always like this. Make a very anti consumer decision that everyone hates, then tone it down so the half of those people will say “we won”. This is a loss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] h4arts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 days ago (6 children)

still just not gonna update my phone for a while until they've for sure have allowed side loading. Got my pixel because it's just a nice phone, and i can put graphene on it when it's paid off. Half of my apps are all from f-droid, too.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] smeg 70 points 4 days ago (4 children)
  • enable developer options
  • confirm that you are not tricked
  • restart phone and re-authenticate
  • wait one day
  • confirm with biometrics that you know what you are doing
  • decide if you only want unrestricted installs for 1 week or forever
  • confirm that you accept the risks
  • enjoy the few apps that still have developers motivated to develop for a user-base willing to put up with this
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

A classic case of making a ridiculously restrictive change, then "walking it back" to a merely semi-ridiculous change and having everyone sigh in relief.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 73 points 4 days ago

This isn't a win, this is Google making things shitty for the benefit of no one but themselves.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 64 points 4 days ago

Still worse than it was before. There's no win in that

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 days ago

Of course we didn't win. the more hoops you have to jump through, the fewer people who will install their own apps and then you lose all of the community support. And Google didn't promise not to change their plans in the future. So you know that they'll promise this now. Maybe they'll backtrack a little if they have to and they will try to ratchet things up six months later anyway.

Real solutions involve either breaking up monopolies or breaking up monopolies, which is why some of the other cell phone vendors' actions recently look positive. If there are two versions of Android that are popularly used, then the banks will have to support both of them and then everyone can run away from Google whenever they feel like it. But if there's only one popular version and Android itself gets more and more locked down then that is Google seizing the entire market and they will cut out all of the other cell phone manufacturers as soon as they can. that will be just as bad as Apple.

[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Narrator: No, they did not, in fact, win.

[–] Jorn@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

My galaxy will let me install but then I get this when I try to run the app:

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Disable Google Play Protect. It's a scam that doesn't protect you at all, it just gives more control to Google.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 14 points 3 days ago

Google Play Protect is designed to protect Google Play from competitors

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CubitOom 38 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"side loading" == installing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So fucking glad that GrapheneOS will probably be available for the new Motorola phones next year. I've been on pixels since they were Nexus, and if not for GrapheneOS, I would have jumped ship after the Pixel 4 and moved to Crapple.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 18107@aussie.zone 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The square app will not run on a phone that has developer mode enabled. I turned developer mode on to disable annoying animations, so now I can't take card payments unless I carry around a second phone.

If Google goes through with this, my payment phone won't be able to run any third party apps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] org@lemmy.org 29 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Time for another OS. Android is over.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›