this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
227 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

82830 readers
3698 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 6 minutes ago

On the fiery side, we might have MAGA troops manning Tesla Tanks.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 58 minutes ago

Fires that entrap passengers are a well-documented and recurring problem with every model in Tesla’s lineup of vehicles, but Cybertrucks appear to have a disproportionate number of known deaths. Safety experts have told the Guardian that the truck’s unique design amplifies the deadly issue. The vehicles come with high-density laminated windows that are harder to break than regular car windows, making escape and rescue difficult when doors won’t unlock. And the trucks are built with materials not commonly used in the industry, like stainless steel, which can complicate the work of emergency responders. The Cybertruck is also the first Tesla model to entirely eliminate door handles on the outside of the vehicle.

First, "unique" design? It's an ugly callback to the wedge-shaped cars of the 80s. It looks like a DeLorean model that refused to render properly, and the dev just went with it.

Second, the decision to exclude door handles is fucking mental. It's a mundane feature that cars have had since the Model T. If they wanted to make a pickup, its handles should resemble those found on a typical pickup. If it's "aesthetics" they're after (which shouldn't matter when it comes to a pickup), some of the best looking cars have had no problem including door handles into its design.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 2 points 41 minutes ago

POINT AND LAUGH

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's what futuristic hidden door handles get you. Nice and crispy.

[–] Denalduh@lemmy.world 0 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

Not all of them act the same way. We have the hidden handles on our 26 Equinox EV but it still pivots open if you press on the opposite side of pulling to act as a normal handle.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

"Burned into a charcoal because noone around knew how to sodomize door handle into cooperation." Would fit well on the tombstone

[–] org@lemmy.org 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

‘Ere little darlin’ — don't shed no tear.

No, no body, no crime.

[–] org@lemmy.org 2 points 1 hour ago

I feel like that needs to be a Weird Al Yankovic cover. Although he would not be so morbid

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Honestly, it may not be drivable but you could set up mobile crematoriums for people's loved ones in a pop up format and make a tidy little business provided you can clear the $10k the truck is worth daily.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 74 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Sounds like a great way to fake your death. The only problem is that everyone will think you died driving a Tesla.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 38 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Good point. Back to the drawing board.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

No one's going to believe a drawing board disappeared a body.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

Ehhh, you'd be surprised what the modern drawing board can do.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 2 hours ago

Or dispose of evidence.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

It... also costs ~~100k~~

Edit: sorry, sorry, 70k — much better

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I mean if you're faking your death I don't think you're planning on paying off the loan

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, I guess that's true

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I don't understand why it doesn't have a door handle. I don't get it

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Think like Steve Jobs. No buttons.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 minutes ago

okay but it's a car so it needs buttons and levers and stuff

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

But it will act as a boat. Temporarily.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 35 points 4 hours ago (3 children)
[–] rimu@piefed.social 34 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Cybertrucks are 17 times more likely to kill you in a fiery way than the Ford Pinto, the previous record holder.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/02/report-cybertruck-safety-ford-pinto/

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not in any way trying to downplay how bad the cyber-dumpster is, but is that an adequate sample size to extrapolate the fiery-death rate? The article says 17 times the rate of the Pinto, but it was only 5 total fires.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I mean they made millions of Pintos so yeah

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Different person, but the Pinto controversy was overblown. Media hype made it an issue when it had similar incident rates with other vehicles at the time.

Ford Pinto - Wikipedia https://share.google/A9xMle5N02j1gPmCl

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 6 points 3 hours ago

The biggest issue with the Pinto was not the Pinto itself, it was how Ford discussed the potential issues with it internally. It was their very well documented preference for money over protecting human life that caused the controversy.

We know this really happens all the time, at all companies and in all industries, but Ford was punished for saying the quiet part out loud (amongst themselves) and getting caught doing it. We are all supposed to at least put on a show of human lives being more important than money, and Ford failed to put on the show, and for that they were punished.

We still don't care about human life, but at least we all felt better about it afterwards.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

huh, TIL. Thanks!

So it's just 17 times more likely to burn you to death than average cars.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Average car of the 1970s.

[–] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 3 points 4 hours ago

With 'murican healthcare prices the fatality rate is a feature.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

But maybe they have the lowest crash rate?
So like, crashes cost money right? Someone is responsible. Someone has to pay.
But if everyone dies in an inferno, then nobody is responsible. Who can pay? They're all dead! What medical bills? What repairs? It's all a write off.
Sounds like a high mortality rate with low accident rate is an absolute profitable win! Free market baby!

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

According to the article they have higher crash rates and fatalities because the drivers are worse. The cars themselves actually rate fairly high in safety standards.

That being said, I think the safety evaluations are flawed and don’t consider things like electronic locks.

[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Free cremation — it’s a service!

[–] Haaveilija@lemmy.world 2 points 42 minutes ago

Feature, not a bug.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You could almost say it's like being put into an oven.

I mean you can just say that if you really want

[–] skvlp@lemmy.wtf 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It will be monetised soon enough

[–] meathorse@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Popup on the screen:

Your Tesla is on fire, escape is no longer possible as your subscription to "Escape Hatch" has expired. In order to enable "FlameOn (tm) mode" for rapid immolation, please approve the one time payment of $4,206.90

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago

ouch oof my bones

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 4 hours ago

Cant wait til they start taking volunteers for the Mars rocket

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

A literal dumpster fire.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Finally, a reason to like Cybertrucks.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Aww what a shame