this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
302 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

83449 readers
2930 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The European Commission preliminarily found Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA) for failing to protect minors from being exposed to pornographic content on their services.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 155 points 1 week ago (15 children)

I wonder why the EU didn't find the parents of the kids to be in breach of whatever relevant child "protection" laws there are? I guess they are okay with the porn websites raising the kids. Maybe the EU can make PornHub to start a chain of day care centers?

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

I would trust porn stars more than Conservatives to raise children properly

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no one should be in breach

just because a freedom enables harming of the self does not mean that it should be taken away

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

Agreed. I was making a tongue in cheek comment about the absurdity of this whole thing. In my opinion, the parents are more responsible than the porn sites, but no one should be punished because young Peter managed to see a boob.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] timestatic@feddit.org 105 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And what do you think happens when big platforms have to introduce age verification? People will just go to smaller unregulated sites which may inadvertently be worse because of malware risks and unregulated content. You just can't take the porn out of the internet, people always find a way

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep, this is already happening with Pornhub in The States.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 80 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Won't someone think of the children

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 72 points 1 week ago
[–] plyth@feddit.org 66 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And so it begins. How long until Lemmy will be forced to verify age?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'll run VPN through Djibouti for everything once that happens.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago

Connect to Djibouti to see the booty

[–] uninvitedguest@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago

I went to early elementary school with a girl from Djibouti. I went home to look up Djibouti in an ancient encyclopedia program. Probably one of the earlier Microsoft Encarta versions, and earned that Djibouti has the best national anthem.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] febra@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And that's how it begins. Soon they'll start asking everyone to provide ID to access the internet.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly. Chat Control being rejected is a minor victory unfortunately. There are VERY powerful actors and organizations behind the scenes for these policies.

I think they realized chat control wasn't going to work, but do not abandon the watch post, they will be back with a different approach.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sineljora@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Minors accessing porn on their own is not a real problem, and hurts no one.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

I suggest that instead of age verification for kids, we do parenting verification licences for anyone wanting to have kids, before they have kids and then don't raise them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] grapefruittrouble@lemmy.zip 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey EU (and all other regulatory agencies interested in “protecting the children”), how about you provide information to parents on how they can setup their own blocking tools, like DNS. You can do this for free, today, right now and actually get the results you supposedly want.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

It's a precursor to a digital ID.

Because China and Russia will use bots.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 49 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Despite stating in their Terms of Services that their services are for adults only, all four platforms allow minors to access their platforms by a simple click confirming they are over 18.

That's weird, I wonder why they did that? They've blocked traffic entirely from age-gated states. But in the EU they're taking a stand of some sort?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 43 points 1 week ago

They did the best they should have to do.

The real crime here is while the EU is trying every angle to error your privacy, that time is not being spent on real issues. You are being sold out by the very people put into positions of power to serve you. If the data supported their goals, I would be there with them, but the data is very clear on the matter and the it indicates we are in for big issues with all these IDs being stored by centralized targets.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

porn should be behind age of consent not behind 18; being allowed to fuck someone but not see media of sexual things is total bullshit

and not as a law. this is not the government's job at all. prohibition doesn't work. the only solution is proper sex ed

just because it's harmful to the self (according to dubious claims) doesn't mean that people should not have this freedom. people's freedom is more important than prevention of them harming themselves.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 23 points 1 week ago

Whoever's currently responsible for the kid should be responsible for watching them and keeping them out of shit they shouldn't be getting into. Expecting everyone else to put up with this privacy invading shit is fucking stupid.

[–] ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The smart people never enter politics and so rational solutions like yours never see the day of light. Plus, it is more about collecting your data and control than protecting anyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So yeah tor doesnt require a ID... So have fun I suppose? And be careful

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (5 children)

And then it pushes people into darker areas. I just sw a post about a horrible rape ring and it hosted videos on sites that I saw on 4chan over the years.

How about parents be parents and monitor kids.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (13 children)

For real. This is like saying all underage drinking is the alcohol companies fault rather than the parents that leave their alcohol easily accessible to their kids, basically providing it for them. Underage kids say 16 or under should absolutely not have unmonitored access to the internet, and that is solely on the parents to enforce. You don't have to buy your kid a smart phone or tablet or computer. When you do your providing then access to the internet and hoping they make the right call.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] death_to_carrots@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago

Didn't know about Stripchat. Sooo … thanks, EU?

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What a second. Pornhub is in US. This is like UK trying to force 4chan into age verification

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If kids are willfully seeking porn, then it ain't anybody's business to stop them. Exploring and enjoying your sexuality is part of growing up, and "moral" whackjobs shouldn't get to decide how people grow up.

Protecting the kids should be about providing useful information, contraception, and official aid against predators.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why do children have to ruin everything?

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because most adults are incompetent parents.

[–] androgynouscloudmoon@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

There are no minors holding EU office, anything being done in the name of "kid-friendliness" is actually advertiser-friendly, minors are a convenient scapegoat with basically no political power who can be leveraged to curtail everyone's rights

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not how the internet works.

The onus is on the users. The parents are the ones who have to figure out a way to ensure what their kid's devices can access, or that they are educated enough not to seek it.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Should kids be allowed to buy alkohol in stores?

[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How a brick-and-mortar store works can't be compared to the Internet.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Until minors can buy alcohol online.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I’m reading and odd headline about the EU and wonder if it’s the Commission again. Then I‘m reading EU Commission and think lobbyist groups, foreign think tanks and the filthy rich.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I am once again asking why a non-European website (pornhub) should have to care.

If you want to censor stuff so bad, then hop to it. Why are you asking people outside your borders censor themselves?

[–] Skv@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Let's do a hot take though - zoomers or whatever newer gen is are so out of natural touch and wired into their doom scroll that they won't even bother looking for porn.

load more comments
view more: next ›