this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
517 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

83220 readers
2904 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 01189998819991197253 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I will switch to Android

And you think that Google won't implement user tracking? It's literally their reason for existing.

[–] v3ritas 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While it’s not (nearly) as convenient, you still have the option to do no-Google Android. At least for now…

[–] 01189998819991197253 7 points 1 day ago

Google is working very hard on killing this option. I hope they'll fail.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 16 points 2 days ago

I will switch to Android

I'll believe it when I actually see it

[–] Steve2734@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why don’t governments force parental responsibilities instead? We wouldn’t need all our data sitting there waiting for the next data breach.

[–] beansoup@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because they don't actually care abt kids or the Epstein class would all be in jail and they wouldn't be facilitating the bombing of schools.

[–] emokidforever@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Because the data is what they want, of course.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A bit of a dishonest question, but wouldn't that argument lead to minors being able to buy alcohol "for their parents"? We are now shifting the responsibility to the stores, not the parents.

I have my reasons to think it's not a fair comparison, but I'll like to hear other's.

[–] Steve2734@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So you’d rather have everyone’s data subject to being exposed and your behaviour tracked, as opposed to parents looking after and paying some attention to their kids? Wow.

Giving an iPad at your kids is not good for anyone. It’s easy though.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

No, but it you missed so much what I said the first time I don't think spelling it again will help.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

We've seen parents fail over and over again. Some parents definitely need a helping hand.

[–] Maverick604@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine being so horrible at your job as a “journalist” or an editor or a publication that you would allow an article like this to be written under your name or publication without ever mentioning the fact that age verification is being pushed by governments, not phone and computer companies (they are trying to fight its implementation), and that it is equally coming to ALL platforms (yes, even Linux) – as required by law. If you want to fight this ridiculous age verification shit, petition (and vote out) your government. I would also argue that this author and publication should be permanently blacklisted for purposely publishing this obviously biased and misleading misinformation.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

'Even Linux' you say? Absolutely wrong. Linux is the kernel, and this is what is allowing some Linux distros to flip the finger at this bullshit laws. As for android, yeah, 'tech-giant' controlled android OSs will have to comply, but alternatives like GrapheneOS won't, and most likely will not follow this rule. We have options, people that don't want to use them are welcome to keep doing as they're told. While I get that the options are 'comply or leave this market' for OS developers, whether small groups of nerds or trillion dollars behemoths, its still a choice, Apple made theirs.

[–] Maverick604@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Linux distros without age verification will be prohibited from distributing to regions where this law is enacted. Of course, circumventing the law is also possible, but that leaves either the project – or you – open to prosecution. As I said, your fight is with the politicians pushing through this ignorant law, not with the people, companies, or projects that are forced to comply.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That's one of the problems. Why are you mixing people in with companies? The largest OS distributors already have this in place, those 'companies' already have this in place. Who do you think has been lobbying for this to be pushed? All of those giants benefit from this by pushing undue strain on small developers, which in turn tightens their grip on the users. Yeah, all the fucking politicians are to blame, as are all those companies as well. I'd this will cause projects to just remove access from those jurisdictions, good. Maybe people in those areas will help vote out the same politicians that bent over for a few bucks for this (unlikely though). Open your eyes, it's not politicians against tech, it's the powerful against us. I'm glad GrapheneOS decided to just not comply. And there are way more open projects taking the same stand. There's still brave people out here.

So, I stand by what I said. I made my choice, you also get to make yours.

[–] pimpampoom@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol sure, like android is not gonna do the same

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 204 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Won't be any different. It's just a matter of time before Android goes the same

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 123 points 3 days ago (12 children)

GrapheneOS is Android and declines to introduce that

Not sure when you'll be labelled a terrorist by using a privacy respecting OS though...

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

By the way our corporate dictatorships are speed-running totalitarianism, I'd say before the decade is done. I will choose to be an antifa terrorist before I accept fascism.

This is actually the least invasive form of age verification for Apple users. Apple already has a credit card on file for something like 90+% of the user base.

The alternative the political whore class are promoting is apps individually verifying with a multitude of ~~data brokers~~ "ID providers".

This is the illusion of choice under the surveillance capitalism of corporate dictatorships. Rather than regulate capitalists, the gov colludes with them to exploit and enslave consumers.

[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but then you'll have a green bubble

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 20 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It's amazing how apple managed to get Americans took care about that. Meanwhile no one else cares. No one uses iMessage in Europe or Asia.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (6 children)

bullshit. no they won't. stock android also gonna get age verification, and is considered bad by apple users, plus its a different ecosystem. stop sharing shit articles like this.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 points 3 days ago (28 children)

I call bullshit. Apple fans happily take anything Apple pushes down their throats. Even a $999 monitor stand or a $40 microfiber cloth.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 days ago

GrapheneOS baby

Kicked my 15pro

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Folks, this is coming from your government. The phone makers want nothing to do with it and are actively fighting it in court as best they can. Switching between phone makers will not help, and is not the right place to put your energy. Address your concerns to your governments.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago (12 children)

The phone makers want your data just as much as the government does. Data is money and power.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Decipher0771@lemmy.ca 47 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I’m dabbling switching to GrapheneOS. Apple was the lesser of (obvious) evils compared to Google, but that’s becoming less true daily.

I don’t think I can make it my primary device yet, still need to de-cloud a bunch of services, but it’s very likely my next device won’t be an iPhone.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 25 points 3 days ago (15 children)

I'm running GrapheneOS since about 2 years now and I'm more than happy.
Didn't had any real issues with it.
Art the start Android Auto didn't work, but it does now - although I don't really use it.

I have Google play service stuff installed, but sandboxed.
And my banking apps work just fine.

Friend of mine made the switch a few months ago and haven't heard of any complaints either.

Can highly recommend it :⁠-⁠)

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Adam_Crock@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I am more happy than ever with my GrapheneOS phone. Especially after they refused to include age verfication I recommend everyone to switch to grapheneos or any other custom ROM android

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

iPhone users 🚶‍♂️‍➡️ switching to android

Android users 🚶‍♂️switching to iPhone

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Android users 🚶‍♂️switching to ~~iPhone~~ GrapheneOS

Switching to iPhone would just be objectively worse in literally every way

[–] cimmerian@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I switched to iPhone after being on android since kitkat. Worst decision I made. Basic functions of the device don’t work/crash out. There’s seemingly no global ‘back’. Each app can dictate how back works. So I’ve found myself having to remember which apps use the swipe back feature and which don’t. They brought in the ai autocorrect stuff which completely changes words that I type. The glass ui stuff is horrific. Some text is unreadable due to the transparency effect.

Just terrible times all around. Looking to go to Graphene on my previous pixel phone next…

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›