this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
541 points (99.8% liked)

politics

29181 readers
3235 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(iii) Proposed provisions specifying that the USPS shall not transmit mail-in or absentee ballots from any individual unless those individuals have been enrolled on a State-specific list described in subsection (b)(iv) of this section with the USPS pursuant to this subsection.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 38 minutes ago

I just instructed the president to lick my balls. I don’t think he will though.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 38 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

So the USPS doesn’t have to do this, they don’t report to the president, and I don’t think this is in any way legal.

If the postmaster general follows this order I would hope anyone in Congress could haul him in and have him arrested.

States run elections, period, and this is blatant election tampering.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

The postmaster was appointed during trump's first term and was constantly trying to destroy the USPS then, and has been trying since.

They are sitting on a huge pension fund that team trump wants to embezzle or spend on war.

Biden admin did not push to get rid of him, so this was part of a bipartisan finance driven plan to destroy the USA.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 minutes ago

One more Biden/Democratic failure. They had four years to get rid of that traitor who was systematically destroying the USPS, and after trying absolutely nothing, they were out of ideas, and he's STILL there. They aren't any more effective when they have power, than when they don't. Fucking LOSERS.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 21 points 1 hour ago

Just like other past irregularities, mild repurcussions after the fact is too late when the election is already stolen.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 6 points 1 hour ago

Not in Trump's America.

Elected by Trump.

No consequences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postmaster_General

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 8 minutes ago

Donny needs to fuck off and not be alive.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 hour ago

Authoritarianism is an admission of abject weakness.

White supremacists are the weakest and most brittle snowflakes.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 26 minutes ago

And what is the approval process?

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

UHM, THEY LEGALLY CANT??? 😭

[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 7 points 45 minutes ago

He can't legally rape children either but that didn't stop him.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Literally hasn't ever stopped him doing anything

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

yeah, though we really wish prone would do their jobs and impeach him and jd out already

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 26 minutes ago

Who's gonna stop them?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

What's that!!? The fat orange child rapist who tried to incite an insurrection a few years ago is now trying to fix and fuck things up in other ways?
Well well well, what a complete and utter shock. If only there was a way for america to have seen this coming...

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Tried to incite and succeeded at inciting insurrection.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 26 points 3 hours ago

He's not leaving in 4 years.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 32 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 44 minutes ago

Drag him into the street and beat the sack of shit to death. Fuck this crap man.

[–] Larsa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You Americans better do something........

[–] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago

We're working on it as fast as we can without getting shot.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 0 points 17 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

Well, we did protest on that one day. I mean, biggest turm out for one day. But, what do you expect? 2 days of protests in a row? Ha! We can't afford that.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 190 points 6 hours ago (12 children)

One of the great failings of this government is not providing a punishment for repeatedly issuing unconstitutional orders. He has exactly zero incentive to stop.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 25 minutes ago

There are no laws; we made the whole thing up

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 50 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Our Congress has allowed a lawless president to do whatever he wanted. It is a MAGA coup dresses as Republicans.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 3 hours ago

This is pretty much the Republican project all along.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 25 points 4 hours ago (7 children)

Checks and balances doesn’t work if one party is in charge of everything. I found the John Oliver episode about Hungary to be particularly terrifying.

Imagine if Trump rigged the election so they had a super majority in the senate and a majority in the house. They could rewrite the constitution. What then?

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Checks and balances doesn’t work if one party is in charge of everything.

Nixon could not have been convicted without Republican votes. But Nixon resigned, because he knew Republicans would vote to impeach and convict him. So the system can in theory work, even if the system depends on policing its own.

It is in fact quite normal across democracies, for stuff like this to depend on the votes of the party in power.

The problem here is that Republican representatives are traitors to their oaths. And more importantly, that Republican voters are not demanding their representatives to not be traitors.

So Republican representatives simply know that they only get reelected if they act tribally Republican. Note that this is generally not a problem with Democrat voters.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Nixon had to be charged with crimes and serve prison time for the system to have worked. As usual politicians get that magical get out of jail card when the exact opposite should be happening. They should be held to much higher standards and punishments.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Ford pardoned Nixon, and Ford lost the next election. And the pardon probably played a part in Ford losing. So the system still sorta worked then, if imperfect.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Nixon was never officially charged with any crime. The modern day pardon is an extremely corrupt practice as evidenced by the current administration. It should be removed entirely honestly.

If it is allowed it should be the responsibility of a non-partisan committee. The president could refer someone but should have zero power over it. I think it would still be abused, but at least there could be some checks and balances.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

So Republican representatives simply know that they only get reelected if they act tribally Republican. Note that this is generally not a problem with Democrat voters.

Ironically, it turns into a problem for Democrat voters.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›