this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
16 points (66.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

32665 readers
1055 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I use Firefox as my daily driver but sometimes sites just work better on a chromium based browser. I had been using Brave but it seems like they keep adding on more bloat (crypto, VPN, AI) and I'm over it.

What chromium based browser would you recommend and why?

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Put in another vote for Vivaldi. It's definitely lightweight. I've got an older server I keep around (for YAR HAR FIDDLE DEE-DEE purposes) and Vivaldi's the Chromium-based browser that works best on it.

That said, the default browser I use on that thing is Waterfox Classic. Vivaldi's lightweight, but it's not as light as that.

Another note: a few years ago I would've actually been able to recommend Edge because to my surprise it actually worked pretty damn well, especially if you were trying to get sites to get Windows-oriented web-apps to function correctly on Linux. Unfortunately they've since pushed several changes that have made it truly obnoxious. Big fat memory hog that tries to load "recommended" content in the background and won't stop sending to/receiving from sites even after you close the window/tab.

[–] AdventuringAardvark@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I also have a server for Linux ISOs. You can never have too many ISOs.

[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

You can never have too many ISOs.

Much like how you can never have too much cilantro.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which sites work better in Chrome? I'm forced to use the Google suite at work, and I do everything within Firefox. Even sites that insist they only work in Chrome have always worked for me merely by switching the user-agent header

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes I am very interested to know which websites don't work.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I had issues with what my work use for online training with Firefox, not often, but occasionally a module will just break. I just use edge in those cases, given its basically chrome anyway.

[–] DeadlineX@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

The website i work on has some pages that absolutely don’t work on Firefox. I know this because I often have to switch to chrome to see if the code is broke or the browser isn’t rendering correctly.

[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Honestly none of them. You can have my firefox when you pry it from my cold, dead, hands.

[–] Zealousideal_Fox900@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Agreed, comrade. We shall defend firefox and Ublock Origin to the very fucking end.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's not what they asked though, they're already using Firefox and they don't intend to drop it

[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Personally I'm fine with sites not working as well (OP's issue). If nothing else, I'm incredibly stubborn, so I'd even suffer slow loading and performance that resembles the early 90s if means I don't have to use anything chromium.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl -1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but they said some sites work with Chrome, but not Firefox? I'm sure there are some sites (that I presume are badly-coded), but I haven't encountered any notable examples.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago
[–] impiri@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Arc (Mac-only for now) is pretty great and has been my daily driver for a while now. Lots of great quality-of-life improvements, a great approach to tab management, and new optional AI features that are useful instead of annoying.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not open source and last I checked you had to sign in to use it. Can’t imagine why people would use it.

[–] impiri@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I carefully hid some of the reasons I use it in the parent comment

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Okay, that’s a hilarious response, but what I meant should have been obvious even if my phrasing was poor. I have trouble understanding why one would believe these features outweigh software freedom.

[–] impiri@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just giving you a hard time. I prefer FOSS generally, but most of my time on a desktop is spent on the web, and Arc's tab/space management is far ahead of anything else right now. It genuinely makes my life easier. The UX is thoughtfully designed and cohesive; even if I could get close to this setup with Firefox extensions (and I tried), it would be janky (and it was).

I'm very much hoping some of Arc's UX and workflow ideas will be picked up by browsers generally.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you for the follow up. Maybe I’ll give it another spin. I’ve been tinkering with floorp but it isn’t polished.

[–] AnokLola@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thorium, because its fast, lightweight and open-source.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fast? I wonder which security features they cut out of it.

[–] Teknikal@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I don't use one but I did watch a YouTube video yesterday praising one called thorium. I might give it a try myself out of curiosity.

[–] TheInsane42@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I switched from Firefox to Vivaldi last year and never regretted it. I like the ad blocking that it has as standard and the uBlock origin plugin makes it 99% perfect. It's pretty light weight and the tab stacks work good. No clue if those stacks are chromium or vivaldi, but they work.

[–] Octopus1348@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 years ago

Just native Chromium, or if you don't want any Google stuff, Ungoogled Chromium. They both use the same UI as Google Chrome. I recommend these because they have no such bloat, and if you want a chromium-based browser for rare usage, it does it's thing.

On an unrelated note, I use GNOME Web on Linux and Safari on macOS (they are both based on WebKit). GNOME Web has some problems, but I can't give up the animation of two finger scrolling between pages and smooth scrolling on touchpad. I use Firefox as a fallback browser on Linux, because I have never really needed something that is specifically Chromium.

[–] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago
[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I'm in the same boat!

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I just use Chromium and go through all settings once to disable every function that isn't "show me the website behind the URL I just typed". Then I install ublock and switch the default search engine to Qwant.

[–] macattack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I do the same thing as well. I still can't determine the difference between unGoogled Chromium and Chromium, but my assumption is that chromium is closer to unGoogle Chromium than Chrome, and just require some of the default settings to be adjusted...

[–] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just tried out Ungoogled. It doesn't let you choose Google as search engine, doesn't come out of the box with the ability to install extensions (which depends on Google's Chrome Web Store), is missing some options that use Google's servers if activated, is stripped of all Google design elements (which gives it a very minimalistic look), and has very privacy-oriented defaults.

Which makes it pretty jarring that there's still a "Google and me" tab in the settings that contains almost no options because everything Google-related was removed.

[–] Tibert@jlai.lu 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don't use chromium, did not test currently.

But I just saw a video about a chromium browser : Thorium.

It's chromium but with many hardware acceleration, speed, and compatibility enhancements coming from multiple sources and from the guy developing it on github, making it very fast and nicer to use than default chromium.

It has Google sync, so it's not ungoogled, but it has way less bload and more privacy than chrome.

https://youtu.be/naDYUVFs1-8?si=Rd6Un0OKANEQHktH

The link to the browser website : https://thorium.rocks/

[–] AdventuringAardvark@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago

I’m gonna test this out for a couple of weeks. Thanks for letting me know about it!

[–] 0x4E4F 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Vivaldi. Why? Highly cuztomizable.

Though slower than other chromium based browsers.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds unsuitable then

It's just as a fallback in case a site isn't tested on firefox and uses some obscure & nonstandard API, so customisable doesn't matter.

[–] 0x4E4F 3 points 2 years ago

Ungoogled Chromium then.

[–] bestusername@aussie.zone -1 points 2 years ago

Just disable the crap and keep using Brave.

[–] knexcar@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I use Chrome! It’s nice how it syncs with my Google profile.

If I need 2 browsers for some reason, I also use Edge.