AFAIK this device was an utter failure. The Soviets figured a much better one (the Kharkovchanka) and to this day those are still in use in the Antartic base.
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
180 points (98.9% liked)
HistoryPhotos
1341 readers
434 users here now
HistoryPhotos is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
- Photos MUST be at LEAST 10 years old, and ideally over 20. We appreciate that we are living through events which will become history, but this is ultimately not a comm for news or current affairs, but events which have occurred some time in the past.
Related Communities:
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historymemes@piefed.social
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
Out of curiosity, where is this thing today? Abandoned in Antartica? Or did they bring it back for the scrap metal value? Or did it make it to a museum?
(Late edit after some Googling. Thanks wikipedia!) It was last seen in 1958. At that time, it was buried under 20 feet of snow. Has not been seen since. Good chance it was either taken by the USSR, or fell through the ice during a particularly large ice break in 1963.
Slick tires... in the snow. 10/10 best idea. Works as well as manhole covers for wheels.
lol, you aint kidding.
As the vehicle was unloaded from the ship, one of the wheels broke through the ramp.[5] The crew cheered when Poulter powered the vehicle free from the ramp but the cheers fell silent when the vehicle failed to move through the snow and ice. The large, smooth, treadless tires were originally designed for a large swamp vehicle; they spun freely and provided very little forward movement, sinking as much as 3 feet (0.91 m) into the snow. The crew attached the two spare tires to the front wheels of the vehicle and installed chains on the rear wheels, but were unable to overcome the lack of traction. The crew later found that the tires produced more traction when driven backwards. The longest trek was 92 miles (148 km) – driven completely in reverse.
AFAIK this device was an utter failure. The Soviets figured a much better one (the Kharkovchanka) and to this day those are still in use in the Antartic base.
Number of Admiral Boyd's Antarctic expeditions: 5
Number of Blaster M's Antarctic expeditions: ???
Give them the same financial backing and see which one is more successful.
Well then don't take my word for it. Look at the other person's reply to my post that goes to the Wikipedia article about it.
If it wasn't for the old timey cars around it I could have believed it is the new 2027 "Extended cab" Dodge Ram.
The body shape and color scheme scream 1970s to me.
Colorized photos be a little like this
Do you know where in MA that is?
I wonder how many gallons to the mile that bad boy got.
As its use turned out to not work as intended, these are just the design numbers:
2500 US gallons / 5000 miles range = 0.5 gal/mi (= 1.2 l/km)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Snow_Cruiser#Arrival_in_the_Antarctic
See that black car in the lower left? I want one of those. I want to convert it to all electric. Then I want to power it using solar panels installed on the roof of my garage.