this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
236 points (93.4% liked)

Not The Onion

16927 readers
1302 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I..what the..HUH??

Absolutely baffling!

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 58 points 2 years ago

"I'll explain: Before you can launch Modern Warfare 3, you have to launch Modern Warfare 2 first. Seriously. "Call of Duty HQ" is just the Modern Warfare 2/Warzone client under a new name.

Switching between Modern Warfares 2 and 3 from the HQ is not like switching modes. Once you're on the main menu, you could jump immediately into Warzone or a multiplayer match of MW2. Clicking the Modern Warfare 3 button, however, closes the HQ app and launches an entirely different executable called Modern Warfare 3. There is no option to just launch Modern Warfare 3, because "Modern Warfare 3" is not its own game. It's buried, literally, inside CoD HQ as a piece of add-on content.

The result? It takes 70-90 seconds to launch Modern Warfare 3—at least, those are the times I'm getting. That's an eternity for CoD, but what's baffling is that these extra steps serve no discernable purpose for players. Perhaps Activision pitched the CoD HQ with consoles in mind, where games aren't so easily organized by series and an app that switches between the handful of still-active CoDs is useful."

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

At this point being into the MW series is basically having a humilliation fetish with a side order of findoming.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sadly, that's the case with most AAA games now. The shit EA and Ubisoft, to name two other examples, get away with because of owning a few extremely successful franchises with huge loyal followings is RIDICULOUS!

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Wait, WHAT!?! Really tells me they could just add content to the same game for 2 or 3 years as DLC and stop with the annual releases. Now THAT, I'd like.

[–] Kraivo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Is that an Overwatch treatment from exactly same company or am i wrong?

[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Really? Your worst fear? You got nothing scarier going on in your life?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

The headline is that of the article, not mine. That part only makes it funnier IMO 😄

[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Do I have to download both torrents?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Dunno, my plans were already to download neither 🤷😄

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I watched a play-through on YouTube instead. I haven't bought a Call of Duty game in a decade, but this one has to definitely be the worst one yet.

[–] redline23@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At some point multiple people looked at this and said:

"Yes. This is exactly how it should work"

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Has anyone checked to see if Elon Musk secretly bought ActivisionBlizzard while we were all distracted with trying to stop Microsoft from doing so?

Because it TOTALLY sounds like how he'd make it work.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pay $8 per month to give your character a blue checkmark on their helmet.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And just like on Twitter, that checkmark becomes an excellent target to aim shots at 😄

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Yeah...I don't understand.

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's okay to blacklist an entire publisher.

I haven't bought any games from EA at all since 2013 and know I missed nothing because it's all just reruns of the same game formula.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Mirror's Edge and It Takes Two are genuinely amazing

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It takes two looked great, but there are just so many games out there I still feel ok having missed it.

Mirrors edge was 2008.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I mean CS:GO was 2012, and it only "died" a few months ago. Hell, Mario 64 was 1996, and it still has a huge following. Genuinely good games remain timeless

Edit: forgot about the part where you mentioned "since 2013," so ignore my point

[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago

CS:GO is a valve title not EA. I was specifically referring to EA.That aside..

CS:GO was only a repackaging of CS expansion which itself was a repackaging of CS half-life mod from 1998.

Sure 14 years later the graphics engine was a little updated and there were new maps, but I played a lot of the original and after installing CS:GO I was supremely underwhelmed by the lack of change.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It Takes Two too often borrowed from that "well that just happened!" school of comedy that I just couldn't stand. Not all the time mind you, but enough to bother me.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I bet it’s so they don’t have to duplicate the login system for their account system or something silly like that.

“We don’t want to maintain X in two places.”

[–] midniter@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

On Steam there is a different entry for MW3, that is waiting to be unlocked for installing on November 10th. It doesn't make too much sense that this different Steam Store game (with a different game id) will also open MW2's CoD HQ. I'll wait and see, maybe there will also be a way to open MW3 directly.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It doesn't make too much sense

My point exactly 😄

[–] midniter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So with the last Steam update, the previous Call of Duty entry in Steam now launches into MW3 directly. To enter Warzone or MW2 multiplayer you will have to wait for it to start the MW2 process. It's exactly how they did it with the MW3 beta and campaign, just viceversa, so to play MW3 MP and Warzone (starting in December) you won't have to wait for game switching.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

This author took the valid position of hating whatever the fuck this setup is supposed to be, and made the whole complaint look silly by how thick the BS was laid on.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that's called an expansion pack.

Why can't they just call things what they are?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Probably because expansion packs typically cost less than a full game. They want to make it easier for themselves to get away with overcharging.

[–] TheLordHumungus@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Haha Cock of Dooty blows. Imma keep crying over the turd pile of battlefield 2042

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't play either game myself, I just appreciate the absurdity of the situation 😄

[–] TheLordHumungus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That is dumb. When will game studios realise shit like that kills their game?

Edit: not you just to make it clear, the situation.

[–] mea_rah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That is dumb. When will game studios realise shit like that kills their game?

When they're done shoveling all the money this brought them. Sadly.

[–] TheLordHumungus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ya, the greed now is unbelievable