this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
673 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83963 readers
2678 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Engineers are confident that shutting down the LECP will give Voyager 1 about a year of breathing room. They are using the time to finalize a more ambitious energy-saving fix for both Voyagers they call “the Big Bang,” which is designed to further extend Voyager operations. The idea is to swap out a group of powered devices all at once — hence the nickname — turning some things off and replacing them with lower-power alternatives to keep the spacecraft warm enough to continue gathering science data.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

It's quite a feat of engineering to have something run this long - and without having physical access to it.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Only 49 years!

Enshitification.

[–] doenietzomoeilijk@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't even run Outlook, let alone two. Pathetic.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

At least they got that part right. It runs Pine.

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Mutt was too much.

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is so fuking cool

I am filled with pride that we collectively made something that will likely out live our sun, and we continue to find ingenious ways to keep it going and going

What a cool time to be alive

[–] nuachtan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I remember when both Voyagers were making their fly bys. We'd get a bunch of images in magazines and stuff, and then wait several more years for the next planet. Between that and the Space Shuttle flights it was awesome.

I wasn't around for the moon landings so Skylab and Voyager were the highlights of my days.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 118 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why can't we be as forward thinking as the people who created the voyager probes?

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 120 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Jesus that is a sobering figure I did not need to see today.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

And it’s quite outdated, I think from 2022. It has become much worse since

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skanky@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

There is no way that disparity is that close.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

Now please show an inflation adjusted graph or better one that shows in percentage how much each fraction owns of the wealth pie.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Voyager 1 was launched in 1977 - just before the Reagan era. Coincidence?

Also, and I'm still just guessing here, it's probably the culmination of the space race to the moon minus the pressure to be there before the Russians.

In other words, NASA's Golden Age.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 15 hours ago

Relatedly, For All Mankind makes me sad since in that universe, the space race is still on.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also, the tech was "just right" then. Small and frugal enough to fit on a probe but still robust enough to survive more than a few years in space.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

not enough engineers use LSD anymore because they'll lose their entire career over it and be blacklisted from government contracts forever.

the McCarthys won.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago

It's not profitable

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What a badass little craft to have kept operating for so long. 🫡

[–] mystik@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Check out AMSAT-OSCAR 7 -- Closer to home, but launched in 1974, and still waking up when there's sun to operate. It's the oldest "operational" satellite still up there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMSAT-OSCAR_7

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AMSAT = Amateur Satellite! Holy shit. Amateur, my ass.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s a satellite for amateur radio, it’s not implying it’s an amateur satellite.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Fucking A good on ya for the heads up. I somehow haven't heard of this one.

Cool that the Polish opposition used it to get around wire tapping.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 13 points 1 day ago

A truly beautiful piece of engineering

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 24 points 1 day ago

Here are Images Voyager Took.

I have no idea how to sort them by recency; I'm guessing it's not sending such expensive data anymore, but what are the most recent (and furthest) images?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

NASA's Voyager engineers are like the final evolution of your uncle that keeps his 1974 Chevy C/K running at 400,000 miles. It's the same autism across an ocean of resources.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago

Actually basically yes. NASA has had decades of practice at minimum viable operation capability, making their spacecraft and rovers all but drag themselves along even when anything else would stop working.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 103 points 1 day ago (2 children)

RTGs are subject to the issue of half-life - this is a consequence of that type of power source. Though, let’s be honest: we do not have any other sort of power generation technology that would be viable for literal decades on an interstellar space probe. And we definitely didn’t have a better alternative when they were launched.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 76 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For roughly three milliseconds I thought to myself they shoulda used solar panels instead.

"Oh, wait...."

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well they could power a lamp that shines on the solar panels.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

This photo was taken after Voyager was launched, NASA didn’t have the technology yet

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It is amazing they can detect and communicate to something with such a weak signal so far away.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So far away that it takes an entire day to get the signal to it. The earth to the sun is 8 minutes.

And somehow we can still talk to it. It's amazing.

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

About 1/3 of a % of a lightyear that's hardcore that we've gotten something out that far.

It also gives you an idea of how big space is. Lots and lots of nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (7 children)

which would shut down components on its own to safeguard the probe, requiring recovery by the flight team — a lengthy process that carries its own risks.

Uhhh... how the fuck are you planning on recovering it?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

I think what they mean is that if the thing starts shutting stuff down on its own, the process to get those things started again is tedious. While if the humans tell it to shut things down, it is all more orderly.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›