this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
145 points (98.7% liked)

politics

29478 readers
2089 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kash Patel has filed a lawsuit over a profile piece. But, by suing, the FBI director only brings more light to allegations about his behaviors and risks future embarrassment

FBI Director Kash Patel's $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic did little to dampen the disturbing allegations in what he calls its "hit piece" against him — and instead sparked a firestorm of broadsides from his critics.

Patel's federal court filing - which included a plethora of typos - summarized the report's nearly 2,200 words of somewhat dense prose into a concise list of 17 easy-to-read sentences about the damning information provided by more than two dozen anonymous sources, some of them current and former FBI officials or staffers at law-enforcement and intelligence agencies.

The allegations cited include that Patel "is known to drink to the point of obvious intoxication, in many cases at the private club Ned’s in Washington, D.C., while in the presence of White House and other administration staff," that he's "also known to drink to excess at the Poodle Room in Las Vegas, where he frequently spends parts of his weekends" and that "members of his security detail had difficulty waking Patel because he was seemingly intoxicated" multiple times over the past year.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 minutes ago

a concise list of 17 easy-to-read sentences

It would be nice to actually see those sentences. But, I can't even find this filing that apparently contains those 17 bullet points.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 2 points 31 minutes ago

I guess the lawsuit claims are always fiction, aren't they? Still, I'm trying to conjure up the imaginary fairy-tale future where Patel could have earned US$250 million if only the darn meany newspapers hadn't laughed at him. I'm not coming up with a lot.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

NPR was talking about the DOJ suit against the SPLC, and they played a clip of Patel ranting about paid informants or some such sh*t and I just burst out laughing. This man has no credibility anymore.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 3 points 23 minutes ago

When exactly did he have ANY?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Patel's federal court filing - which included a plethora of typos - summarized the report's nearly 2,200 words of somewhat dense prose into a concise list of 17 easy-to-read sentences about the damning information provided by more than two dozen anonymous sources, some of them current and former FBI officials or staffers at law-enforcement and intelligence agencies.

They should make some kind of computer program that could find misspelled words and alert you to them. Of course, if you were shitfaced and on ambien it might not work anyway.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

In his most prolific writing era, Stephen King would wake up, chug a bottle of NyQuil, snort a fat line of coke, and write and drink the rest of the day (peppering in some additional drug use throughout the day, of course). He doesn't even remember writing entire books but they came out in a coherent form. It's almost like even if the magic spell checking software doesn't work, you can just hire a sober editor to make check your work.

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 30 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This guy seems cooked, did they tell him to sue so this would happen, directly under the bus? This idiot seems like one of the guys who would go out and spend a bunch of money after a big bank robbery.

[–] homes@piefed.world 28 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

This is a guy who would live stream the bank robbery

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 minutes ago

"20 subs and I jump up on the counter and fire wildly into the air"

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 5 points 2 hours ago
[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

That Director Patel “recently expressed frustration with the look of FBI merchandise, complaining that it isn’t intimidating enough.”

🤦‍♂️

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

Only the best... the best drunks, fraudsters, rapists, dead beats... the best

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

In a way, I can understand him. Or can you expect him to stand Trump and stay sober?