this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
243 points (98.0% liked)

Gaming

19960 readers
1 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 83 points 2 years ago (1 children)

just shove a 4090 and a forklift battery in there, ez

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

But then you'd need to get forklift certified to operate the thing

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] onion@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago

Damn fella, save some ussy for the rest of us!

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 80 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is a good thing. We all know valve can't count to 3, so the 2 will be the last one

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it be Steam Deck 2 Episode 2?

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago

Steam Deck Alyx

[–] uis@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Steam Deck 2 rc 2

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Cool, does this mean they'll actually fucking sell the thing in Australia, or is it just forever going to be dodgy resellers?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The technology to ship this to Australia just doesn't exist yet.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 8 points 2 years ago

They even need a upside down type c cable

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 15 points 2 years ago

🎵dream on🎵dream on🎵dream on🎵dream on🎵

[–] dewritoninja@pawb.social 13 points 2 years ago

Welcome to the south American experience

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Imagine Valve going the Apple route: "Fuck it, we will design our own hardware to suit our needs" and making hardware tailored to linux.

Edit: what about qualcomm's new ARM: Snapdragon X Elite?

[–] gornius@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I think ARM is their end goal, it's really the only option for a handheld console, as today ARM is the only way you'll get enough performance/power rate to make it both good on battery with good enough performance.

Win-win for everyone if they invest in an open source x86 to ARM project, similar like they did with Wine.

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The Switch is more than proof enough that pretty much any modern game engine can compile to an ARM target with zero issues (though Nvidia's low level APIs help, not sure about Qualcomm).

But there's zero chance older PC games would ever be updated, and by older I don't mean ancient, some AAA studios stop issuing updates in about one year after release.

So it all comes down to being able to emulate X86 on ARM... The best example we have is Apple, and games run but with a massive performance hit. Microsoft's implementation is borderline unusable. I'm not sure what to expect from Valve.

[–] Dani551@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

Checkout Box86/64 and Fex-Emu. They both do x86 translation/emulation on ARM Linux and the results are wayy better than any reasonable expectations I had going in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Every year they are more likely to go RISC-V.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Nah ARM is barely more efficient than X86. As soon as AMD went TSMC 3nm they got almost similar power efficiency. As the Apple M chips.

Apples "magic sauce" is just being the first one on the new TSMC nodes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and making hardware tailored to linux.

They already did it.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They didn't. They asked AMD to do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Powerglove style controllers with a holographic screen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Back then, we really couldn't engage with a display manufacturer to do exactly what we were after because they didn't really understand the product category, or who would be buying the screen, or why it would matter. Now that picture has changed and we're able to get custom work done.

Why would literally any of those questions be of concern to the screen manufacturer? And I don't understand, did Valve begin work on this in 1918? How could anyone not understand the product category?

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Display manufacturers may understand what Valve might want in a screen, but they might not understand how many units of a screen of such a specification they would be able to sell — is it going to be a custom job for just a few thousand of valve’s experimental console (which may have different degrees of success), or is it going to be something that they can sell to more people and a wider audience.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

Understanding a product and having practical knowledge about building a speciality part are different ball games

[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Does Steam Deck support VRR on its built-in display?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›