this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
66 points (98.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43810 readers
1 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Self defense? Only on the battlefield? Only to achieve a β€˜noble’ end?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 48 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Self defense. But also like someone else said proportionate response is key. If someone gets mad at you in a bar and throws a punch, pushing him away is fine. Hitting him to subdue him is probably okay. Shooting him dead is not.

I'm also not really okay with people using murder to defend their stuff. Like if someone sneaks into my house and I catch them going out the window with my tv, shooting them is not to me justified. There are more TV's. That guy gets one life. Remember what Gandalf said.

I think a lot of people have like tough guy fantasies about shooting a burglar and it always makes me uncomfortable.

On the other hand, if someone was on trial for shooting a Nazi dead I would find them not guilty. Shame that Nazi spontaneously bled out. But at least he's gone before he killed my entire family and friends.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Remember what Gandalf said.

"You haven't aged a day"?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 23 points 2 years ago

For anyone who sincerely didn't get the reference:

Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends.

[–] hardaysknight@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

β€œFool of a Took”

[–] HeatDeathWelcome@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago

When the rich break the social contract.

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When someone who I was supposed to be able to trust kept repeatedly trying to record me naked in the shower, I retaliated once by kicking him hard in the face. I was told that what I did was wrong and violence was never the answer. I disagree.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I agree with you and disagree with anyone who said it's not OK.

Some people will learn with a gentle hand. Some learn with a slightly firm hand. Some only learn when you pick up a 2x4 and beat them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aksdb@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As a kid another kid regularly bullied me. Nothing extremely serious... pushing me, grabbing me, putting me in a headlock, stuff like that whenever he felt like it and/or wanted something. Parents and teachers were not able to stop it and I basically just got retaliation. One day when he came at me I simply kicked and managed to hit right in his balls. He ran away crying. Never bothered me again afterwards. Still feels good.

[–] Trebuchet@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Punching nazis. Always acceptable, even encouraged.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

Punching nazis is always self defense.

It’s kind of infuriating how many un-punched Nazis there are out there.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I want to hear from the two down votes who didn't comment. Fuck nazis and their shitty sympathizers. A punch isn't enough

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Violence is justified when it’s needed to protect yourself or someone else from violence. That’s about it, honestly.

I am not a fan of pre-emptive violence.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

What about post-emptive violence?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Self defense, as part of a game (such as wrestling) or in BDSM, when both sides are okay with it and don't face actual danger.

[–] 31415926535@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Safe, sane, consensual.

[–] Starshader@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

Self dΓ©fense, yep. On a battlefield ? Let these old fuck fight one vs one to resolve their conflict. A noble end is so fucking subjective that I think it would be a terrible idea.

[–] MrAlternateTape@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Violence is justified when you have no other means left to defend yourself or someone else otherwise.

At which point I would like to add that people will sometimes not be able to see the means they have left because they are put in a stressful situation in a second. I feel like you can't really blame them for that.

Violence as a response should always be in proportion. That should avoid escalation. In an ideal world.

Unfortunately some people won't stop. Those people need to be put into prison where they cannot hurt anyone anymore.

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I heard a quote that has really stuck with me, it goes something like "violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived"

I don't really condone violence, but this quote has really gotten me thinking.

I think you would be interested in reading a bit on the philosophy of Thomas Hobbs and "the monopoly of violence".

[–] arthur@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Use of some violence is justified to stop another bigger, ongoing violence.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I would argue to stop other violence, not necessarily bigger, is also justified. It's never allowed unrestricted, especially as the bigger entity, but a tactical or measured response to prevent further violence can make sense.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When you are the victim of a loot ninja

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

when someone is WRONG on the internet

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

You are wrong

[–] atimehoodie@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

To protect against violence

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Violence is a form of escalation. One should never cause a conflict to come to a new height and should only resort to something if in response to anything of that same height.

Also, if a ruler of a nation resorts to that, it shows they're not a great/effective ruler. Fluency in how to rule is determined by how much peace you can accomplish with as little change as possible. Less is more, as they say. If you have to punish people too often like some are doing, you're violating that "less is more" rule.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 5 points 2 years ago

Self defense but also including defending your rights, freedom, property, and sovereignty

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Self defense

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Only when all other options are ruled out. And obviously, you should not be the aggressor in any situation

[–] wagesj45@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

It's always a matter of degrees. The bigger the injustice, the more violence is justified to rectify it. It is in the disproportionality, in my view, where the problem arises.

Never forget that humans are just barely evolved apes. Sometimes a swift knock to the head is required to activate those neural pathways to discourage anti-social behavior. Not always, but also not never. Claiming otherwise is just self-aggrandizing moralization that people use to make themselves sound and feel superior.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

this is where the mythological concept of sin sorta helps. So its a bad thing but basically you decide at what point doing the bad thing is worse than other bad things but you can't ever make it not a bad thing. You just accept its price at some point and its ultimately and individual decision and I don't think many will know until that moment. For myself I try to avoid it as much as I can but I don't know in what situation I will be driven to it.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

When folks are mean to service staff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί