this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
363 points (97.9% liked)

pics

29703 readers
261 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Los Angeles (Chatsworth) caught by wildlife enthusiast!

News article

3 min video: https://youtu.be/FTceZxXYZCw?is=YuR7ftdMDVmC0vhI

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Doing the lord's work, Son.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

Reddit used to have some bots that looked for AMP links and would post non-AMP links. That'd be kind of useful on the Threadiverse as well.

[–] AviAdi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol OK I fixed mine too. I was just lazy

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

FYI, I still the AMP link on your "News article" link.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wow Coyote Vs Acme marketing are really upping their game

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 19 points 3 days ago

The movie looks way darker than I expected.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Anchorxiety@reddthat.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AviAdi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[–] zeroclue@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 days ago

I call AI because I watched TV in the 90s and learned that it is not possible for a coyote to catch a bird. It is a fact and I will die with that universal knowledge. Despite the other fact that one is a ferocious predator and the other one is a stupid bird.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There were weird 1 downvotes on a bunch of comments, and I can't help but think of the coyote, furious, crouching over a keyboard, "smashing that dislike button" 🤣

[–] AviAdi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe it's an angry roadrunner? 😂

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You've missed a couple. Why'd you give up?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 3 days ago

The SOB finally did it!

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Roadrunner top speed running is about 25 mph, a coyote top speed running is about 40 mph.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago

Coyotes are only that fast while wearing rocket skates

[–] the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

You can't convince me that isn't a cleverly painted dummy with a stick of dynamite in it.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 12 points 3 days ago

I have lived in a place where there are roadrunners and coyotes.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Fake news. No rocket roller skates.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Muthafucka.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Coyote's run faster than road runners.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 3 points 2 days ago

That's no normal coyote, its clearly radioactive.

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

how many brick walls painted to look like a tunnel were built on the road near where this picture was taken?

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's no evidence of explosives used. Is this photo confirmed not AI?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honest talk. There's actually a mini crisis in birding and animal photography because of the use of AI. Images generated or altered with AI without disclosure are being published as facts in scientific journals and misleading research efforts on the health of animal populations which are vital to guide conservation efforts. Many biologists and scientists depend on the photographs of amateur or professional wildlife photographers. AI is inducing error and noise in the information they get to work with.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

Just to add a little more context here, it's not just that people are using AI to make fake pictures, it's that AI tools in photography apps are making enough adjustments in the photo that one bird might get turned into a different bird by the enhancement tools.

It's especially problematic, because a bird that's native to a very small area in a less developed part of the world might not have many examples of it online.

One example: Someone might take a picture of a bird in the Amazon, and photoshop takes the picture and uses AI to clean it up, and the result is that it turns into a picture of a common north american bird. Which then becomes a "documented" case of a common north american bird being sighted in an uncommon location.

Making it even worse


the photographer might not even understand what happened. They might truly believe that they found this unique scenario.