this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
368 points (99.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

27800 readers
1697 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Someone out there has been confused because they thought they parked on the 25th level.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

Or the 52nd

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 31 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

reminds me of a game I used to play

[–] apex32@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Reminds me of a Simpsons episode

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Whoah, I wonder if the animator played Zillion. The Simpsons were on The Tracey Ullman show starting the same year Zillion was released.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

Thank goodness.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I get all the others, but the 4 is messing with my head.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, not sure what’s up with 4

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

OMG I WAS GONNA SAY THE SAME THING BUT I THOUGHT NO ONE WOULD HAVE A CLUE WHAT I WAS TAKING ABOUT!!!!! I've never met anyone in real life or online who ever heard of Zillion!

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I’ve never seen it mentioned ever either.

Funny thing is it took until I played it on an emulator to realize that the code symbols were just the numbers 1, 2, 3… mirrored. When I was a kid and first played it, I used to have names for the shapes they made Like M, Heart, 8, U, Bottle…

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 10 points 10 hours ago

Lemmy, bringing people together over obscure and otherwise thought lost knowledge since 2019.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 39 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I started looking at the top floors first and my brain just could not process that those were numbers. Not until I started at the bottom and worked my way up.

[–] TheTruthShallLemmySee@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

Haha, yes this happened to me as well!

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

These are a bit fun, but in all honesty this parking garage needs to be torn down and replaced with something actually useful

[–] hyperion626@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sooooo what do you propose for all the vehicles inside of it? Parking garages are not cheap, which means there was a significant need for parking spaces.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago

Sooooo what do you propose for all the vehicles inside of it?

Anyone parking there has a serious surplus of money - it costs €13/hour to park there.

What they should do is to keep their cars at home and take transit like literally everyone else is doing. Mind you that this is one block from the Stockholm's central plaza, served by Stockholm Central station, i.e the place that is best served by transit in the entire country.

Rich people vehicle storage is an exceedingly poor land use for such a place.

Parking garages are not cheap, which means there was a significant need for parking spaces.

It was built in the 60s when everyone in the country had highway psychosis. We've grown past the illusion that everyone should be taking their car everywhere and get to store it everywhere, especially in dense city environments.

[–] lepthesr@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago

When I was a kid I used to doodle a 4 with a mirrored 4 like this and make a little spaceship. This pleases me

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It pisses me off so much that 4 and 6 are backwards.

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

They're not though. Read from left to right they're oriented correctly. It's the other floors that are backwards when read left to right

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago

I feel like the majority orientation determines the right orientation.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Not if you look outside from within the building.

[–] anguo@piefed.ca 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

.. They're symmetrical, they look the same from both directions.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

But 4 and 6 are read edge-in, and the others are read middle-out. The mirroring is inconsistent.

[–] anguo@piefed.ca 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but looking at them from the inside wouldn't change that.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

No, each pair looks the same whether you’re viewing them while standing inside or out on the street.

To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards.

Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago

Ah yes you're right. I was thinking about the numbers individually.

[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, very interesting point. Either way some of them are backwards which is a shame for a cool design idea like this

[–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah cool design nevertheless. Found some pictures from within, they picked one of the 'wrong' floors for those shots, hehe: https://www.sosbrutalism.org/cms/18741632

[–] vrek@programming.dev 4 points 15 hours ago

If you didn't say what they represent, I'd never of guessed