this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
173 points (91.4% liked)

Greentext

8699 readers
769 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustyfish@piefed.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

If you listen to today’s 4chan, you’re an idiot.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 52 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

TIL that the opposite of loneliness is having had sex

[–] webp@mander.xyz 7 points 2 hours ago

We could learn a lot from anon

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 70 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

There is no male loneliness epidemic; there is a loneliness epidemic. They have been talking about it since at least 2020 and it predates the pandemic. Anyone calling it a male loneliness epidemic is absolutely engagement farming. The entire manosphere is a rage-bait-engagement-farming scam.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 5 points 52 minutes ago

There's a general loneliness epidemic, but there's a difference between men and women.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 26 points 4 hours ago

Not just engagement. Back when it was just a loneliness epidemic, there were talks of maybe bringing back third places, or changing society to help. Then it became a male epidemic, and suddenly it was someone else's problem, it's an individual issue, no need to make a cause of it.

[–] Uri 3 points 2 hours ago

20 and still virigin

[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is actually a really fucking eye opening post, assuming they're not lying. I personally never thought there was a "virginity epidemic" among my peers, lol.

It seems like people have gotten less cliquey about virginity since then, so maybe it is a good lie?

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago

I wanted to check if anon was lying, but the only recent numbers I found are on what looks like a website of a conservative think tank with a pronatalist/marriage ideological mission (a little creepy imo). It does reference a cdc survey that seems real as the data source but still a bit sus to me though too much effort to reproduce their work. I'm pretty sure it's anon's source of information since it also covers ages 22-34 and they chose that range deliberately:

We focus here on males and females ages 22-34 because this is the key window in which people tend to marry and start families

And the other numbers that I looked at seem to match up. If I'm being paranoid I'd wonder if anon is actually their intern doing social media propaganda campaigns.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 98 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

having sex (perhaps just once?) doesn't equal not lonely, though.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

In fact sex being used as the indicator is actually a clue to one of the largest contributors. There's a very wide reaching assumption that men should get most of their emotional support from their female partner. This is often very stressful to the female partner and is a fragile way to meet a basic need; if she gets sick or dies he's probably not far behind her. Men need to learn how to compliment and hug each other platonically. It's 2026 and it's for their own good ffs. I keep giving my male patients brochures for men's support groups and I really hope at least some of them are actually going.

[–] Daywim@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

It seems so surreal to me that other men don’t hug each other, or tell their friends that they love them

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

Furry here, we do that stuff. It's pretty good, can recommend.

Also men used to do that a lot more, before the world wars.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 17 points 5 hours ago

Having a ton of sex doesn't equal not lonely either.

Like Barney from HIMYM, or Charlie Sheen in 2.5 men.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 37 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No, I'm pretty sure that every man who has had sex at least once in their life turned out to be a top bloke

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

But can't top blokes be lonely?

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They say it's lonely at the top, bloke.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

So.. more men as bottoms?

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Assuming the numbers are similar in my country, my circle of friends is more unusual than I thought...

[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 0 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Soo in my group of friends and former classmates the situation is really bad.

Now we were a group of gamers. That didnt help to meet girls LOL. Also early porn consumption. I guess as early as 16 might have had an effect. The guys who dont have obvious flaws but get no women were into mangas early on.

My advice would be skip the porn and the fapping. Select hobbies that give you chances to meet women.

[–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 6 points 56 minutes ago

I agree with the hobbies, but I think you can probably still jack off.

[–] Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 hour ago

The guys who dont have obvious flaws but get no women were into mangas early on.

Are we talking regular Mangas or adult ones? Because if it is regular Mangas, why is that stopping them from meeting people?

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Me in the >10% category.

[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

To me, the Bubonic plague will always be "the epidemic", but COVID can still be called the pandemic since it happened all over the world at the same time, which makes it more pandemic than the Bubonic Plague

Edit: "didn't even read the greentext before I started yapping about something" award