this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
97 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31034 readers
1784 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 10 points 3 hours ago

As a Republican I HATE Flock and HATE my Lack of Privacy but what I REALLY REALLY Hate is when people try to Hold BILLIONAIRE CHILD RAPISTS ACCOUNTABLE! THATS why I voted AGAINST Massie!

-LITERALLY Republican Voters!

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 18 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Massie unveils Flock-Off Act aimed at restricting surveillance cameras

btw - Flock CEO got his house blurred out on Google Maps and Zillow.
Remember this. this is how they feel about their privacy and yours.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49467750

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

I'm not defending that guy, but anyone can get their house blurred on Google maps.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

But it's in public, he has no right to privacy. We have the right to put up a camera and film him as he enters and leaves

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Duh. Ofc. But not many people do as they don't know they can do it. Interestingly this prick opted in to do it

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Massie is the one rare Republican that I have some respect for.

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

I think hes doing it now mostly because Trump funded his oponent and kickded him out of congress. hes gone from there January 3, 2027. trump never forgave him voting against big beautiful bill

he would probably much more likely to support no minimum wage and no universal healthcare overall.

he might run in 2028

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 minutes ago

Nah this is pretty consistent with his stances throughout his career. He's more of a libertarian than a republican. And a real one, not the cosplay kind where they're only pretending to oppose welfare programs.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Massie was all on board publishing Epstein files. And wasn’t he against Jan 6 ers also?

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Prez turned against him because Massie refused to fall in line on Epstein. This is not a chicken or egg situation.

Massie stood up for what he thought was right, and got kicked out of his party for it. Credit where it's due.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 8 points 5 hours ago

Well, he and Khanna stood up for the Epstein victims against the will of the orange pedo before said pedo backed his opponent. That's mostly why I respect him a little. But only a little: fundamentally he's still a piece of shit Republican.

As for what he does now, yeah clearly he has nothing to lose and he does it to annoy the pedo.