Hello all, I am just curious if anyone has taken a tool like community rule to define how their instance or community control is handled? Even more so if there has been any effort to make the actual decision-making actionable by the system.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I'm sure it's been tried, but we know by now that anything that is codified gets gamed. You just have to act sensibly, and accept that if a big enough division of opinion on something occurs, the community will fork. That is a natural step of evolution and not something to get upset about.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 2 years ago

I read the about and still don't understand what it is or how it tries to accomplish what it's doing. I run a couple communities, I'd be interested in making a structure, but I have no idea what this tool is

[–] machinin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is a bit of a tangent, but I think there should be options for the type of community you set up. One kind is the traditional, moderator-controlled community. Another kind could be a more democratic community where members have more power (and responsibilities).

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I had some rough work but haven't gotten around to posting for feedback. I might be misunderstanding it, but my thing was a "best practices" thing for communities and instances.

Planning to finish it up soon