this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
654 points (100.0% liked)

196

17898 readers
70 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 102 points 2 years ago (4 children)

A 1080TI still plays every release at medium or higher settings. /shrug

Unless you're worried about 4k or VR, I wouldn't upgrade anyway.

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you care about refresh rate it matters, not a lot of people can stand 30-40fps with hard drops to single digits just to be able to play a game.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm curious. What game do you think drops to single digits fps on medium settings with a 1080TI?

I was playing Darktide on a 1060 with minimum 30fps recently, and that game is optimized like absolute trash.

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Starfield.

1080 is the minimum card, the TI is decently more powerful (30%), but you’ve got to make concessions on medium to get 30fps, and there’s drops.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be fair though, that's a VERY new game and they cared so little about optimizing it that they went out and said "you're probably going to need a new computer to play this" ..

I hear the 1080ti runs Doom just fine 😛

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 6 points 2 years ago

That's Bethesda's fault. There is no fucking reason that game can't run well on a 1080ti for how mediocre it looks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago

Have a 1060 for vr.actually works fine

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I actually prefer the crisp edges without as much post-processing effects sometimes. Source engine games look great to me, just minimal crisp and clean geometry. I find a lot of modern graphics distracting, but it depends on the game. I do love really pushing graphics for a game like Skyrim.

[–] spader312@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Modern game engines don't use the amazing SSAA (super sampling anti aliasing). Most have post processing anti aliasing like FXAA or TXAA which always makes edges look fuzzy. Source engine is one of those that still supports super sampling

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again, when humanity is wiped out future species will find a Nokia on half battery and a fully working 1080Ti.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

.....

.....

I have never felt more called out.

1080ti is still a beast

[–] OmnislashIsACloudApp@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

1070ti gang here. no problems playing anything on medium/high.

I don't do 4k though but VR is fine.

[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I feel like I'd need a display that can do 4K before I upgrade

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

They can pry my 1080 out of my cold dead 12fps hands!

[–] ChildEater@iusearchlinux.fyi 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Polyester6435@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago

1070 is comfy AF, been on one for so long now and I haven't seen any reasons to switch yet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PotatoKat@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] adhocfungus@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

My 960 runs Unity games like Overcooked at 4k, so I probably won't be upgrading any time soon. With a toddler I don't have time for AAA games anymore, but I'm guessing the frame rate would be painful.

[–] runjun@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

970 here too. A true hero o7

[–] Coaster45@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Having to run -400mhz on the vram to prevent mine from crashing all the time but I'm hanging in there 🥲👍

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] capital@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SargPotTea@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Me and my 1060 ain't going anywhere

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's still a decent card, probably can still do well at 1080p max settings in most games. Very similar to a 3060 in terms of performance, which is the card I have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Thade780@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Depends on the games. My 980TI can still rock 3440x1440 in most of the games I play.

The fact that what I play is mostly metroidvania shouldn't be an issue, right? 😅

[–] smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My 980ti still holds up pretty well at 1920x1440 (high-end CRT monitors were beautiful things, restart production you cowards) for most 3d games I play on Linux, but it is starting to have performance issues in some games, and I'm getting real sick and tired of the dumb shit Nvidia keeps pulling with their Linux drivers. The current driver gives me horrible black flickering in a lot of games, and of course they arbitrarily lock me out maxing out my CRT monitor (which don't have a fixed resolution, only a balance of resolution vs refresh rate, and it keeps blocking me from a whole range of refresh rate/resolution combinations). So I confess I am starting to eye the higher-end AMD 6xxx GPUs, and I would definitely try and grab one as cheaply as I could if I ever got a 3440x1440 ultrawide.

Incidentally, how are ultrawides for having two or three windows open side-by-side at the same time?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I'm actually considering upgrading to a 1070 (i have a 1050ti)

[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I have a friend that's always "waiting for the next one" who finally got a 3080 and meanwhile I play games with him on my trusty 1050

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is how I've always felt, running on old second hand unstable rigs. But it's better than nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mars@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago

My 970 seems as old as the wheel if you read this kind of threads.

I really need to upgrade my rig…

[–] optimal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 years ago

I remember when the 1080ti was top of the line. Good times.

[–] Hubi@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Even the base 1080 is still a very capable card. I recently gave mine to a friend when I upgraded to a 3060. And looking at the market, the Pascal generation will remain the goat for the foreseeable future.

[–] knolord@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I am still holding on to my 1060 6gb, and honestly, if not for AI stuff, I wouldn't even consider upgrading.

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I just went from a 3770k with a vega 64 to a 7800x3d with 7900xtx. Pretty big jump!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 8 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Did they remake Lolo Rabbit?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My 1050ti wont ever leave my side. I am going to die with that card beside my death bed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KeefChief13@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

My old 1080 still handles a stream now and again.

[–] manual3204@iusearchlinux.fyi 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My 660ti is finally showing its age...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] peanuts4life@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moonburster@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Gave up my 980ti for a 6700xt and am very glad. My i7 2600 (non-k) will be used till it truly shits the bed, going to frame it

[–] Evrala@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I spent more time with my 2600k than I did with my threadeipper 1950x.

I remember when a new generation came out (I forgot which) and I just overclocked the 2600k till it matched the stock benchmarks for the new chip. It truly was a monster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ultragramps@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m expecting some good build opportunities in Spring 2024. Plan is to build two desktops, one AMD-heavy with the Arch-based Steam OS and another Nvidia desktop with Nobara and space for windows 12.
Storage on a self repairing raid array on a PCIx16 adapter is looking amazing, but hardware raid configurations are still preferable to software configs and I Still Haven’t Found What I’m Looking For.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aulin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

My 690 still works for many games. 🥲

[–] SoupACabra@lemmy.wtf 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why is no one talking about FSR3 and frame generation here?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›