this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
-26 points (27.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

37888 readers
467 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We like boom boom, no?

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The risk of a failed launch and having a nuclear warhead falling on an unintended target isn't negligible, and sending a heavy payload outside of the Earth gravitational pull is quite expensive.

Same reason why we don't send our nuclear waste into space or the sun.

And damaging another planet in our solar system use of little scientific value compared to leaving it as-is.

[–] CaptainMcMonkey@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We thought about it, but then we signed a treaty or two that cancelled the project.

[–] CaptainMcMonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Personal opinion though: It would be an absurdly expensive way to taint future study of any place we nuke, especially if we want any hope to find any type of life on another planet.

I really hope we find something on Europa or Titan. Both have water and heat, so maybe they’ve got something next to a seafloor vent or something.

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

2 flaws I see.

All countries have a gentleman agreement not to launch nuclear material into space. If the launch failed, it'd be catrostrophic for people here in earth.

It's really expensive to launch stuff into space, getting stuff out of the earths orbit is another level of power beyond getting it above the atmosphere.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They use radioactive materials on long range stuff

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You would be a contender in either American political party with a platform as robust as that one. @ViscloReader@lemmy.world 2024!

[–] ogginger43 4 points 2 years ago

I'd really hope my tax money doesn't go to something like this. But I'm sure it's paid for dumber things.

[–] the_beber@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Are you by any chance a writer at Kurzgesagt?

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Because we wouldn't be able to see it from that far away. I say we do what you said but for the far away land of Britain and that way we can all enjoy it here on earth ☺️