this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
511 points (97.4% liked)

memes

16449 readers
2690 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 121 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That is quite expensive, maybe two girls can share one...

[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You know what's cheaper than that? Being one guy with a jar.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And a my little pony figure.

Any other use is dangerous

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Blackmist@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, have Gen Z rediscovered the thermos flask?

[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes, but they're calling it a "Stanley cup"

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In Canada it's legal to cross check anyone who calls a thermos a stanley cup.

[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

You didn't have to preface "cross check" with "In Canada".

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Is that because it's made by Stanley instead of Thermos?

[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Whenever there's a stupidity expensive version of a functional thing, Coleman makes a version that's as good or better for half the price: https://www.coleman.com/coolers-drinkware/drinkware/.

[–] OrgunDonor@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3S51X9h6K6g

I really like the project farm video on this, fairly good information on the quality of these.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

That’s a great video! Looks like I need to upgrade my whatever-brand water bottle to a Stanley!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shani66@ani.social 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Is this a trend or something? My grandma got a two pack for $5 and i thought it was just some generic grandma cup. The thing sucks, it isn't anywhere near worth that much money. It's shitty for traveling (too big and unwieldy) and it doesn't even seal as well as an actual thermos or bottle.

I prefer the crappy plastic bottle i got from work years ago, i could strap that thing to my belt if i went anywhere. Or wore belts.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Fuck plastic bottles especially older ones. Yeah, w all have a fuck ton of microplastics in our blood but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t care about it

[–] shani66@ani.social 9 points 2 years ago

I'd prefer a metal one, but this thing was free and it's better than the grandma cup

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Does using a plastic bottle for your water carry any sort of effect? I'm sure all the things stack up but I find it hard to believe that using a plastic water bottle instead of metal one really matters.

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That is for bottled sold water, not from water bottles that you refill.

I'm sure using plastic anywhere in any form contributes to microplastics absorbed into ones body, but there is probably a difference? It's just important to be specific what a study says and not accidentally make assumptions.

Also though, I'm gunna keep using my refillable plastic bottle. Trying to manage intake of microplastics based on how much plastic I interact with seems tedious to the point of being impossible. Plastics are the kind of thing that need regulated. And while I might spare myself some microplastics hypothetically, it's not like the water bottle won't break down into microplastics in the dump if I replaced it with a metal bottle.

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, the difference is it will take more time to check those so probably in ten years you'll see the same news but about thick plastics...

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

This is a guess but I would assume the bottling process in water bottling plants, and the manufacture of the disposable water bottles, contributes to the amount of microplastics more than passive decay of plastic. Really my main points/beliefs are:

  1. We should be careful making claims based on scientific studies to make sure they are accurate to the study, especially when it comes to claims about how a solution for a problem may be reached. A slight misunderstandings can cause good motivations to make things worse (like people collectively throwing away all their reusable water bottles and buying NEW water bottles made with metal, effectively turning millions of usable waterbottles into trash and creating demand for more polluting industry).

  2. Plastic pollution, microplastics, and everything related, is an overproduction industry problem, not an individual responsibility problem. While a concern for ones own health is individual, it's also almost impossible to meaningfully avoid microplastics with the current situation. The responsibility doesn't rest on the shoulder of consumers to collectively make good choices, but on governments to regulate and for owners of industry to be held accountable for the damage they have caused.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Hah I actually posted the same study in a reply. Though it was a CNN article about the study.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Steak@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It does if you do it for years. I use glass and metal whenever I can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's no way your grandma bought two Stanley brand cups for $5. I've been using a Stanley pint glass for years, and if I put ice water in at at night, there will still be ice in it in the morning. It's vacuum insulated.

$45 for a 30 or 40 oz cup with a straw is too much because there are cheaper brands that do the same thing for half the price.

You will have to pull my 40 oz insulated cup out of my cold dead hands. Waking up in the middle of the night in the summer thirsty and being able to sip on water that's still ice cold from 8 hours ago is so nice!

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I recommend Zojirushi thermoses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] page@discuss.online 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't get it. Men go around for years carrying Yeti tumblers and no one bats an eye. Women start carrying a similar cup with a handle and everyone acts weird.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

worthy of ridicule

Because limited edition cups of the brand I used to buy at the Flying J truck stop for $12.99 now costs $150, and the resale value is $200. People are buying a half dozen or more to go with whatever they’re wearing. They’re Stanley mugs for heaven’s sake.

It’s absolutely stupid, and Yeti was just overpriced trendy stuff, not the equivalent of a Beanie Baby fad as a fashion accessory.

Can’t wait until these fools are stuck with piles of worthless mugs they wasted money on. You’ll find these mugs at yard sales or Goodwill in a few years. Good for Stanley makers, though. Hope they laugh all the way to the bank over this vapid trend.

Edit: TBC I think the overpriced Yeti gear is dumb, but I never thought of it as being “gendered”. Plenty of women had Yeti gear. The levels to which this Stanley thing is being taken is ridiculous, and it seems to be predominantly a female thing as a fashion accessory. It’s not dumb because women are the ones buying it up, it’s just dumb because it’s dumb. IDC who the suckers are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I'm just amazed that anyone thinks a metal coffee tumbler is superior in any way.

Here's the ultimate way to drink coffee, after years of experience trying different things:

  • large double-walled borosilicate glass mug. You can find several versions of this on amazon, get one that fits your cupholder.
  • plastic lid from any other travel cup for when you need it, usually it fits pretty well

The only downside is you will occasionally drop it and it will shatter into a million tiny pieces.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

I'm just amazed that anyone thinks a metal coffee tumbler is superior in any way.

The only downside is you will occasionally drop it and it will shatter into a million tiny pieces

Hey look, you were able to think of a way that metal coffee tumblers are better!

[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

lol yeah I'm not bringing that monstrosity in my car. Stainless steel is perfectly fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Marge is in the back with her hair down.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

That doesn't look like Marge at all.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

No she´s not

[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You think she's cheating on Homer?

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Marge is faithful to Homer, when she had the opportunity to cheat, she did not do it in the end.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've seen people make jokes about those. I thought the thing was the joke at first, it's so uncomfortable and strange looking. I guess it was a popular Christmas gift for some reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›