this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
819 points (95.7% liked)

Political Memes

8625 readers
3352 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

As a veteran, I feel this. I wish I'd served crack instead too.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 93 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If they hand you a gun and tell you to march off to die in a foreign land, turn the gun around on your killer.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

LOL, the support of Ukraine is happening exactly so we don't get WW3 and won't have to send our soldiers to fight.

Anyone who thinks Ukraine is Russia's ultimate goal is extremely naive.

It wasn't Crimea, it wasn't Georgia, it wasn't Chechnya. It won't stop until

Here's a quick summary of what it is about: https://youtu.be/M6tsp4mFix8

This is a book published in 1997 which Putin was following and largely until full invasion of Ukraine everything was going smoothly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Ffs. Russia is not going to fight NATO. Why'd they attack Georgia in 2008? Answer: To prevent them from joining NATO. Why'd they attack Ukraine? Answer: to prevent them from joining NATO. Russia is not dumb enough to fight anything that can throw nukes, that's why they're preventing the NATO umbrella from covering (what they consider to be) their sphere of influence.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 22 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Question: If Russia has no intention of fighting NATO then why would they give a fuck if Georgia joined NATO? If they were afraid of NATO invasion, as silly as that is, could they not just offer Georgia a similar mutual defense agreement? I cannot imagine any circumstance other than overt greed and expansionism that would require them to invade Georgia.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah it is all bullshit. All the Eastern European countries that could, joined NATO in speedrun, because they knew Russia will claim them back as soon as it is capable to do so. Ukraine and Belarus decided to maintain good relationships, and look at how it paid back.

Russia is a cancer and the countries that hate them the most are their closest neighbors, exactly because they know what kind of cunt the Mother Russia is.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] ElegantBiscuit@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Their plan isn’t to fight NATO directly. It’s to instigate domestic political support in foreign countries against entities like NATO and the EU, and push nationalism and isolationism and defeatism into enough people’s heads so that the bigger countries think it isn’t worth fighting Russia to defend another smaller country that is not their own. It’s about killing the idea of article 5 and thus NATO’s reason to exist, so that Russia can confront each country on a bilateral basis where they have the military advantage if no one is coming to their defense.

This probably wont happen with an assault on a major urban area, but little chunks of unpopulated Finland or Norway. How willing would the American public be to send pilots to die for Lapland? If the major powers blink and don’t feel like committing, Russia continues to escalate, like they’ve been doing for the past 15 years

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn't plan to join NATO. Ukraine had a single digit percentage interest in NATO before crimea.

Russia doesn't want Eastern European countries in NATO, because it makes it much harder to take them over.

NATO is a defensive alliance, and is no danger to Russia except for their imperialist goals. Best example of it is after Finland joined NATO Russia removed their troops from that border. That's right Russia now has less troops there than they had when they were imaging Ukraine.

And one last thing: even if it was true, since when Russia can decide for sovereign nation who they form alliances with? The excuse to invade looks exactly as the same bullshit Nazi Germany invented with Poland (both claiming to save German minorities and also that was actually planning to invade Germany). They are not even original.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

That's when they implement meat grinder tactics. You get trained, but no weapons. The weapons are deployed ahead of you on the front line; better get one quick before you die! Turn around and your own side shoots you first. People go in, meat comes out, and so the handle turns.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why don't Presidents fight the war? Why do they always send the poor?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Millennials volunteered for Iraq.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Before World War I and World War II, many thought things would not escalate until we realised it was far too late. The British intelligence thought the assassination of Franz Ferdinand would only be contained regionally instead of escalating to a world war.

Most wars are class wars and most issues are class issues. But most people are not class conscious. The base tribalism is instead drummed up to distract us from the real root cause. We're seeing the rise of the far right in many countries such as in Europe, US and India. Most of the rise of the right is due to influx of migrants, who are displaced by neocolonial foreign policies of corporate backed governments and capitalism-induced global warming.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (21 children)

You'd be amazed what some good old fashion propaganda will do for you.

The US was so gung-ho after 9-11 they accidentally attacked the wrong country. I know they didn't have any problem getting troops or buy-in from the people of all ages. It was pretty disgusting how quickly your average citizen bought into the bull-shit the Bush administration was selling when it was obviously a lie.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 year ago (18 children)

This sentiment of 'I'm not going to fight' is funny until the war actually starts. And then it's either you fight early, or you fight late. Sometimes too late.

[–] MinusPi@yiffit.net 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Nah. I'd legitimately rather kill myself than fight for my government.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (69 children)

I mean it definitely depends on the circumstances. If Russia attacks here then I'm absolutely fighting.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Russia attacks

Don't worry, we've got Sarah Palin on watch.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (68 replies)
[–] Stanwich@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

As long as they are recruiting the dumbest and poorest from your failing high-schools you'll always have enough for your wars.

[–] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Millennial here. Can confirm, I'll be staying home and doing my own thing. One live isn't worth more then another and I'm not going to war. If you're going to put me in jail because I refuse, then maybe I need to find a different country to live in.

[–] kusuriya 17 points 1 year ago

On the very off chance they restarted the draft, there are tons of reasons the Pentagon would fight conscription, make sure you know asylum procedures or have the stuff ready to immigrate. Run don't try to just ignore the draft.

They, the last time they did the draft, didn't just throw normies into jail, they grabbed them then kicked them over to the military and then if you ran away and got brought back after being AWOL they just deployed you and let happen what happened, regulars frequently discovered that these sorts had... uhh... "accidents" at a more frequent rate.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'll defend my country, but I'm not going to engage in an armed conflict overseas.

IMO, as long as it's not directly threatening me and my life, then I will simply see another WW as old people who are angry at other old people, sending me off to die for their grudge.

No thanks chief. Stick me in prison if you're so inclined but I'm not about to kill some poor kid I've never met and I don't have anything against, just because you can't use your words.

✌️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So...they are going to send gen x and gen alpha?

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gen X here, fuck that noise.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We're too old. There's a reason they recruit high schoolers. They don't have enough life experience to know when they should say, "with all due respect sir, fuck that," when given an unlawful order. Also they know we are more likely to kill the officers if we decide to go out.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Elementalbeast@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Between propaganda and indecision, a whole generation will learn of conscription.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

Nah fuck ya'll Ima sign up if we have an enemy worth fighting for the first time in my life. I'll push the lines to Moscow, Beijing, idgaf: dictatorships will destroy us all if left unchecked, make life not worth living for everyone. The whole time I'm deployed I'm going to be using absentee ballots, and if I make it back I'm gonna use my new cred to run for office and fight the corporations, too.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you are in the US, you might wanna prevent your own dictatorship first.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

I would defect to the afterlife before fighting a war for this country.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 13 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Hey if anyone’s a lawyer or knows what they’re talking about what’s the current consensus or constitutionality of conscription in the US? I think it’s illegal under the 13th amendment (which literally bans servitude AKA forced service) and the only court case I could find had the opinion of “well everyone else does it!”

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If I remember my constitutional law classes correctly, conscription was canned after a series of Supreme Court cases where conscientious objectors successfully argued that under the 1st amendment they could not be made to serve. Since "religion" is very loosely defined in the US, pretty much anyone can claim that conscription violates their free exercise of a peace-loving religion.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] NIB@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

If that is an option for a western liberal state but it isnt an option for an authoritarian state, guess which state will win. And then it wont be an option anywhere.

You have to fight for your rights. And authoritarian states know that your attitude is prevalent and they intend to exploit it.

Now you might say "but of course i will defend against an invasion". Well, what about an invasion next door? What about a tiny landgrab of let's say 50sqkm. Would you willing to die for such a small piece of land? This kind of "small" infractions and hybrid warfare is how Ukraine almost lost its entire country.

And this isnt a "Russia" thing, it is an "everywhere thing".

Hitler did the same, he didnt go from the start "you know, everything is ours". No, they just went to help some ethnic germans in Czechia, then took a break(Munich Agreement). Then went to help some germans in Poland and took a break(Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact). And since they were winning and those damn russians might attack them, they might as well attack first. But such a campaign would require a lot of resources and to secure their flank, so i guess the germans needed to grab a few more countries too.

Strongmen and authoritarians only respect and understand power. Anything else appears as weakness to them. If you are not willing to use violence and they are, then you will lose. Even if you dont lose now, you will lose in the future.

PS And no, people wont "rise up" against an authoritarian government. Thats not how things work.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You have to fight for your rights.

Agreed, which is why we need to turn the guns on our own ruling classes.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I'm too old, I'm bipolar, and honestly I'm not scared to shit my pants and/or dress if necessary.

load more comments
view more: next ›