They already have called it "antisemitic terrorism" even though the attacker turned himself in to building security right after.
Considering the victims are rumored to be an engaged couple and the perpetrator been seen waiting, I'm thinking a more personal motive like jealousy, or a specific case, rather than racism.
That's one way to spell "slamming cocktails"
You're excused 😉
7% is a large margin of error though, for something you wanted 'exactly'
Guess we both failed at making a good joke about it.
This is the internet, you can't expect people to read! ~/s~
Anything but the metric system, huh?
That's clearly 1/3rd cup, btw, as it's in between the 1/2 & 1/4 cup ones.
He just cares about making "great television" and boy, did the world watch the last Oval Ambush!
Considering 'were' just means human, technically we all turn into a werehuman on a full moon.
Except Stephen Miller, he's obviously a vampire.
Also would be more interesting if the site would publicly show the questions/verdicts as they come in.
Coal plants require an emission capture to be built into any new plants, which is exactly why nobody wants to build one.
The gas plants should have the same regulations, I agree. The subsidies is a whole different can of worms in the money debate, but my bigger issue there is more about how they were used/implemented.
Personally, I feel as if the government should buy back the nuclear plants after the shutdown and build a new core there for supply safety, and this repeal is a step in that direction. It doesn't happen often, but I think NVA is right in this case
Without going into the Gaza - West Bank schism, Hamas has governed the Gaza strip for nearly 2 decades now and its military is de facto that territory's military forces.
The argument of 'political militia' only holds water if there is a significant opposition party with a relatively equally large military force. I have yet to see evidence of that.
It doesn't help that there isn't a currently valid "constitution of Palestina" which could regulate military force and who controls them.
Article is wrong on a major point though:
They are not undoing the phase-out part (actually a cap on the active lifetime of a reactor), but lifting the ban on building any new reactors. There is no deal to maintain the currently active plants any longer than what the previous governments negotiated with Electrabel/Engie over and they are still poised to close qs planned
This change is here because the ban included medical/research reactors, such as the one in Mol that used to provide chemo-therapy products, which we are now buying abroad.
As for the other arguments usually found on this topic:
Think the spotlight on them after the Adjuster, means the government can't afford not to go after them for more unscrupulous shit. Otherwise, they'll be seen defending UHC and give more fuel to the argument Luigi's trial is rigged and he's just a patsy.