CubitOom

joined 2 years ago
[–] CubitOom 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Sorry about that. However this is why I archive the videos of crimes that the fascists are committing onto decentralized platforms.

When I posted this about an hour ago, it was there on reddit with lots of comments and upvotes.

Fuck reddit

[–] CubitOom 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What's the current gold to cocaine ratio?

[–] CubitOom 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If not fascist, then why fascist shaped?

[–] CubitOom 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only if you want to see a bunch of crimes.

It's also slightly interesting how 4 or so men putting all their weight on a person might break ribs and other bones considering how often we see the paramilitary arrest and then abduct people like this.

[–] CubitOom 50 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Being a nazi is not politics, It's being a fucking nazi.

[–] CubitOom 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Gene Sharp has a lot of great points. I also recommend his book The Politics of Nonviolent Action which has a lot more detail.

However, in the end I asked myself what would Picard (of Star Trek) do and I realized he would be armed and capable and use violent resistance as a last resort.

So I bought a Mossberg 500 and am training with it once a week. I even feild strip it and put it back together. I also started training in Brazilian jiu jitsu which is a pretty fun way to get into shape. I am getting good at grappling and choking big guys out. I'm also learning a bunch about radio.

Another book I recommend is Full Spectrum Resistance which has examples of why it helps to have both nonviolent and violent resistance.

So if you don't feel right with a gun, I think that's ok. As long as we are doing something productive while we can. And it doesn't hurt to level up some skills that you can use to help your community if the unthinkable does happen.

[–] CubitOom 1 points 1 week ago

And all it cost them was $1,000,000 donated to the inauguration fund

[–] CubitOom 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, that's an odd choice for the page element to be.

[–] CubitOom 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The image and text are both in the linked article

[–] CubitOom 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Several hours after the White House post, the Department of Homeland Security put up its own Halo image with the message "Destroy the Flood," and a link to the ICE recruitment page.

Comparing immigrants in the US to a parasitic alien life form that infects and annihilates advanced societies is not deeply offensive, it's also rooted in the worst of human history: As seen in the untermenschen of the Holocaust and "cockroaches" in Rwanda, to name a couple recent examples, dehumanizing the "other" so you can more easily inflict cruelty, injustice, and horrors upon them is hardly a new technique, and the US government's messaging was not subtle.

[–] CubitOom 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thank you for making theses posts. However may I suggest you add a headline to the title of the post?

It might also me good to add something at the to the end of the title to indicate that there is more to read. Maybe something like [continued below]

Also, consider making some posts links or including a link to an article if there is one.

 

"The brown paper bag test" is a term in Black oral history used to describe a colorist discriminatory practice within the Black community in the 20th century, in which an individual's skin tone is compared to the color of a brown paper bag. The test was used to determine what privileges an individual could have; only those with a skin color that matched or was lighter than a brown paper bag were allowed admission or membership privileges. The test was believed by many to be used in the 20th century by many Black-American social institutions such as sororities, fraternities, and social clubs.[1]

25
Brown paper bag test (en.wikipedia.org)
 

"The brown paper bag test" is a term in Black oral history used to describe a colorist discriminatory practice within the Black community in the 20th century, in which an individual's skin tone is compared to the color of a brown paper bag. The test was used to determine what privileges an individual could have; only those with a skin color that matched or was lighter than a brown paper bag were allowed admission or membership privileges. The test was believed by many to be used in the 20th century by many Black-American social institutions such as sororities, fraternities, and social clubs.[1]

 
 

Martial law in the United States refers to times in United States history in which a region, state, city, or the whole United States was placed under the control of a military body. On a national level, both the US President and the US Congress have the power, within certain constraints, to impose martial law since both can be in charge of the militia. In nearly every state, the governor has the power to impose martial law within the borders of the state.[1] In the United States, martial law has been used in a limited number of circumstances, such as New Orleans during the Battle of New Orleans; after major disasters, such as the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, the Great Flood of 1913, or during riots, such as the Omaha race riot of 1919 or the 1920 Lexington riots; local leaders declared martial law to protect themselves from mob violence, such as Nauvoo, Illinois, during the Illinois Mormon War, or Utah during the Utah War; or in response to chaos associated with protests and rioting, such as the 1934 West Coast waterfront strike, in Hawaii after Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, and during the Civil Rights Movement in response to the Cambridge riot of 1963.

 

Martial law in the United States refers to times in United States history in which a region, state, city, or the whole United States was placed under the control of a military body. On a national level, both the US President and the US Congress have the power, within certain constraints, to impose martial law since both can be in charge of the militia. In nearly every state, the governor has the power to impose martial law within the borders of the state.[1] In the United States, martial law has been used in a limited number of circumstances, such as New Orleans during the Battle of New Orleans; after major disasters, such as the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, the Great Flood of 1913, or during riots, such as the Omaha race riot of 1919 or the 1920 Lexington riots; local leaders declared martial law to protect themselves from mob violence, such as Nauvoo, Illinois, during the Illinois Mormon War, or Utah during the Utah War; or in response to chaos associated with protests and rioting, such as the 1934 West Coast waterfront strike, in Hawaii after Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, and during the Civil Rights Movement in response to the Cambridge riot of 1963.

 

I guess he's saying the figurehead of the maga regime is a king and we should all bend the knee. But the American people today, showed what we think about kings.

Source

 

the original source seems yo have been removed or something, idk fuck reddit I wish people would stop posting there.

Article

Sources:

18
MAGA Attacks! (cdn.social.linux.pizza)
 

Alt-text: A heavily armed military invades an American city, causing wanton destruction and death while one of them says, "Don't run. We are your friends."

view more: ‹ prev next ›