If you don't want to keep reading, then don't. I'm not your mom.
There's so much media that I'm sure can hook people and if something fails, then just move on to something else. We have the world's knowledge accessible to us and more information than any one person can ever hope to consume. It's OK to be picky about what you spend your time doing when time is your most valuable resource.
If you want to have commitments, make them to communities and those important to you, not to media.
If you want to use large language models or other generative predictive models (I refuse to call it AI) then I suggest considering self hosting those models for ultimate control of the information you provide.
1, if you don't like it, then try something else. You could even read a book.
True. I think it depends if pasta is the main or just a side dish. But weighing spaghetti on a scale is pretty cumbersome.
I'm just imagining the infomercial of some guy knocking the plate off the scale and then spaghetti is all over the floor saying there's got to be a better way and then another guy comes up, and rips off his shirt to reveal his spaghetti portoner nipple ring.
I think I would prefer a simple nipple piercing pasta portioner, cause I always have a hard time figuring out how much to cook.
There should be something for grabbing store information too. Like phone numbers, websites and open hours
You know what saves a lot of CO₂ in China? All the 1st tier, a lot of 2nd, and most 3rd tier have a functional rail system. Public transit is also pretty good in general. If any other country is going to take lessons from China public transit should be the main takeaway.
It might be less confusing to simply list the engines being used. It ruins the check mark aesthetic but I think the info is more important.
I didn't use a validator, formatter or prettifyer since I just copied and pasted the json that obtainium exported. I was able to import it onto my work profiles obtainium using the exact data posted in the code snippet however. I wouldn't mind seeing a diff to know what the difference is since it looks the same to me too. I'm not sure why your getting the error, I'll just screen shot the settings.
I see the logic, and I'm not really sure if I disagree with it. But is it possible that the time you took with those books you decided to continue could have been better spent? Even if some of those you didn't initially like became favourites later? I am going to assume that you also have favorites that you did actually like initially and didn't have to push through an initial burn in phase. If that's true, then you would have missed out on the slow burn favorites but might have found more favourites that didn't have the slow burn which you haven't gotten to read yet.